We expose another myth about the overpopulation of the Earth.
World population density
The total area of our planet is 136,120,354 square kilometers.
More than 70% of the earth's surface is occupied by the waters of the world ocean, so the sum of the areas of all states within their state borders is used to calculate the density of the Earth's population.
According to our calculations, at the beginning of 2021, the population of the Earth was approximately 7,851,163,856 people.
Thus, the population density of the Earth is 57.7 people per square kilometer.
Below we give alternative estimates of the density of the Earth's population, depending on the implied surface area:
15.4 persons per square kilometer - the area of all continents and the world's oceans (510,072,000 km2).
52.2 persons per square kilometer - the land area of the Earth, including the islands and Antarkid. In this case, the area is 150,461,685 km2.
57.7 persons per square kilometer - Sum of land and sea territories of all states on Earth.
In this case, the area is 136,120,354 km2.
![](/file/15db2a1fb358c0aee965c.jpg)
Considered these two and all the claims against them 😂
The population of the Earth is the total number of people living on our planet. Today, 7.83 billion people live on Earth. It took humanity more than 200,000 years to reach a population of 1 billion (around 1800) and only about 200 years for that number to grow to 7 billion.
According to the estimates of the United Nations Population Fund, the main milestones of the world's population were passed in the following years:
1 billion - 1804
2 billion - 1927 (after 123 years)
3 billion - 1960 (after 33 years)
4 billion - 1974 (after 14 years)
5 billion - 1987 (in 13 years)
6 billion - October 12, 1999 (after 12 years)
7 billion - October 31, 2011 (after 12 years)
It should be noted, however, that according to our calculations, 7 billion were reached only in February 2012.
Currently, the world's population is increasing by more than 90 million people a year.
The sex ratio in the world is 1.018, that is, men are not much more than women. The median age of the world's population was 30.4 years in 2018.
More than 70% of the world's population lives in the 20 most populous countries in the world. There are only 2 countries in the world with a population of more than one billion people: China and India. Despite the fact that China is the most populous state, it is expected that by about 2023, the population of these countries will equal and India will take a leading position.
Top 20 countries by population (29-09-2020).
1 China, 1,413,942,600; 18.05%
2 India, 1,400,313,267; 17.87%
3 United States of America (USA) - 334,733,145; 4.27%
4 Indonesia, 275,389,799; 3.52%
5 Brazil - 218,020,991; 2.78%
6 Pakistan, 210,742,268; 2.69%
7 Nigeria, 209,211,215; 2.67%
8 Bangladesh, 171,391,083; 2.19%
9 Russia - 146 614 915; 1.87%
10 Mexico, 136,450,135; 1.74%
11 Japan, 125,827,605; 1.61%
12 Ethiopia, 113,335,608; 1.45%
13 Philippines, 109,344,641; 1.40%
14 Egypt, 102,502,881; 1.31%
15 Vietnam, 99,077,836; 1.26%
16 Congo, Democratic Republic, 90,988,462; 1.16%
17 Turkey, 85,960,996; 1.10%
18 Iran, 84,521,082; 1.08%
19 Germany, 81,491,872; 1.04%
20 Thailand, 69,325,402; 0.88%
This is a list of the 20 most populous countries in the world as of today. Approximately 5.48 billion people live in these countries, which is 69.94% of the world's total population.
World population 2020.
In 2020, the world's population will continue to increase and at the end of the year will be 7,858,772,994 people. The natural increase is expected to be positive, as the number of deaths will amount to the number of deaths by 95 230 270.
Dynamics of changes in the population of the Earth in 2020.
According to our estimation, daily change rates of World population in 2020 will be the following:
427 457 births per day (17 810.72 in a hour)
Mortality: 166 552 people per day (6 939.68 in a hour)
The population of Earth will be increased by 262 295 persons daily in 2020.
![](/file/fed5bb463e78dda017dda.jpg)
![](/file/da9cf181437372364a263.jpg)
![](/file/bf87b416e236229aa7186.jpg)
![](/file/2708ae6e5cc880d90d127.jpg)
![](/file/785f860ae6a8195d75f4b.jpg)
![](/file/f4a4cd4cc2ec13e251b33.jpg)
According to the UN, 795 million people in the world are hungry.
25 years ago, the number of hungry people was a billion. The desire of certain and well-known persons who want to give billions of dollars of programs for successful is obvious: to imagine the reduction of those suffering from malnutrition, but we have accumulated a lot of questions for you dudes!
Let's start with your calculation methodology curve!
We take into account that during the same period the population of the planet grew by 1.9 billion - then how to relate all this to apocalyptic scenarios, providing for the impossibility of providing an ever-increasing population of the Earth with adequate nutrition in the very near future?
The question that does not go away for many decades from the TV screen and various fascist forums is the notorious overpopulation of the Earth and the associated difficulties in providing people with food, when entire regions of the planet periodically literally die of hunger. Reasoning on this topic, looking for many years thousands of vidos of local residents of different countries and peoples, about whom you rub into our ears as starving, we came to the unequivocal conclusion Comrades Communists - onanists from the UN programs 🇺🇳 - this is the same problem sucked out of your finger as your global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer and other horrors and horror stories of milking the plebs. behind which loam in full growth your ominous shadows of the beneficiaries of money 💵 national budgets and budgets of international organizations also formed at the expense of the funds of nation states and taxes of citizens.
To at least slightly assess the scale of the problem (including the scale in the literal sense), you need only a calculator, a map of the Earth (even paper, even computer) or a globe, as well as a little common sense.
So, there are currently 7.5 billion people on the planet – is that a lot or a little?
And 10 billion? And what kind of population can the Earth feed in principle?
We will not look into your mouth 👄, because you are not an authority for us at all. We will now disassemble and get our own result. And you try to publicly challenge it.
Take a map of the planet of the usual room format or, for example, open Google Planet Earth, where the "tools" have a convenient ruler. To begin with, we conditionally allocate 1 m² to each person, and on this, it is enough free square for one standing, we place all the inhabitants of the Earth on an area of 10 thousand km² (a square with a side of 100 km or 10 billion m²). The most promising 10 billion people expected by the middle of the 21st century will fit exactly.
What will the specified area look like on the globe map?
Elementary Watson: in the form of a small rectangle on an infinitely huge uninhabited space. Rectangle, the size is not much larger than a large medium metropolis, and much smaller than the largest Chinese city of Chongqing, covering an area of 82.3 thousand km².
Actually, back in 1968, the English science fiction writer John Branner wrote about the same thing in the novel "Standing in Zanzibar" - in his overpopulated world of the first half of the 21st century, the entire population of the Earth could fit elbow to elbow on one rather small island of Zanzibar.
Yes, we agree: 1 m² per person is not enough, it's about nothing. Then we allocate to each of 20 m², quite suitable for a more or less comfortable stay, and settle all, for example, in densely standing residential buildings, the number of storeys of which is, for example, 10 floors. We get: 10 thousand km² x 20 (m²) / 10 (fl.) = 20 thousand km², i.e. the area on the map will increase only 2 times (rectangle 100 by 200 km), remaining several times smaller than the area of Chongqing.
And now try to persuade the talkers from the screen to persuade us, since we began to apply some parameters of comfortable living, to expand the conditional 10-story buildings, to arrange a kind of courtyards, parking lots, roads, sidewalks and a bunch of administrative and household institutions necessary for the life of the metropolis, up to treatment facilities?
According to our estimates and calculations, the area will have to be increased by about 10 times - this is the minimum, without frills and different areas and wastelands there.
The result: 200 thousand km² - a rectangle of 200 per 1000 km, which turns our conditional city into a kind of supermegapolis, but exceeding in area, taking into account the relative low-cost, the largest city on Earth by only 2.5 times.
That is, even in 2050, the entire population of the planet can be placed in one, only very large, city!
![](/file/85771b1f6329cd5373f26.jpg)
How comfortable is the final figure of 20 m² of total urban area per person?
Not comfortable!
However, it correlates, for example, with the Principality of Monaco, where there are only 50 m² per person, or with such an island-metropolis as Singapore, where one person has 125 m² with parks, squares, squares, office buildings and even a zoo, as well as other giant shops of "unnecessary things". So the calculation, based on the minimum necessary needs for a full life in the city, is not so far from reality.
The cheque 🧾 you for payment.
Source data:
– the area of the entire land area of the Earth is almost 150 million km², of which about 70%, that is, about 100 million km² are suitable for agriculture and other types of products;
– all the inhabitants of the Earth (with a margin) can be comfortably (without frills) located on an area of 200 thousand km²;
Intermediate result:
- all earthlings are able to fit on an area of about 0.2% of the entire habitable land surface, which is at the level of statistical error, but in fact - beyond its boundary. Even if we increase this figure by 10 times - up to 2 million km² with already quite worthy 200 m² of total urban area per 1 person, then in this case the area of the supercity will be only 2% of the total land, i.e. slightly above the level of statistical inconsistency. In the future, you can use just this indicator.
Further, we are easily convinced of the ability of the land to feed both 50 and 100 billion All this is quite possible and real, but only if there are in the power offices of managers of managing people's lives, and not finished stupid morons, thieves, priests and other scoundrels who made their way to power not at the expense of their knowledge and skills, but with the help of other methods and qualities. not at all useful to most nation-states.
To finally dip your head in the toilet 🚽 we will take a speculative indicator that for a full "food" (vegetables, fruits, fish, poultry and livestock) one person needs about 10 acres of land suitable for ordinary (not superhypertechnological) life.
At the same time, we omit the natural question of the specialization of farms and the possible exchange of products between them, since not every 10 acres can simultaneously breed fish, cattle and break up a garden with a garden. Just as we omit quite possible attempts to combine plots into larger farms, for example, for sowing cereals, which are meaningless to grow on 10 acres. But most importantly: we consider only one parameter - the possibility for a person not only not to starve, but quite the opposite - to eat a variety of environmentally friendly food, without the use of high-tech methods - from large equipment to chemical fertilizers, and, especially, GMOs. We just take and make the average temperature in the hospital: we give people 10 acres and everything, and we do not try to rely on scientific calculations 🧮, because all these figures are a bunch of shit in the form of calculations that diverge by orders of magnitude with the real state of affairs ⬇️
Ecological Madonna of the 21st Century 😂 Presents the Club of 💃 of Merry and Resourceful Liars of the 21st Century
![](/file/104f8843a5273111354f5.jpg)
![](/file/e46b25c64efb5ff23f838.jpg)
![](/file/49a5a61956afbd6f1fa96.jpg)
![](/file/4a5263e58021293d82e49.jpg)
![](/file/d89f49447d87fbd784e50.jpg)
![](/file/da0d021cd1888175a542a.jpg)
![](/file/71643c04be89acb918210.jpg)
![](/file/3d7302b2543f34cb41944.jpg)
![](/file/f96fab137dee71ce444db.jpg)
![](/file/1142625fc88217b8f559a.jpg)
![](/file/689fc96db28f33fb3c3c8.jpg)
![](/file/75d4c35676e6a173b45b2.jpg)
![](/file/a37e681765b482791d5db.jpg)
![](/file/87fb486a9131f2e3c40a8.jpg)
![](/file/db8a8b402153d7a1089b4.jpg)
![](/file/2427baab6aed4e84c56e5.jpg)
![](/file/91bb18f97d7050acfd684.jpg)
![](/file/c75cffeddb08b2a142526.jpg)
![](/file/704694819bca9c0b84272.jpg)
![](/file/774b153dccd4a385739dd.jpg)
![](/file/1cfc39f9e2ecc1b7d152e.jpg)
![](/file/3a3239c4da9a7ad24478c.jpg)
So, in 1 km² - 10 thousand acres, therefore, 1 km² is able to feed 1000 people, from which it follows that an area of 10 million km² is needed to feed 10 billion people.
We sum up with the result 2 million km² (at the rate of 200 m² of total urban area per 1 person) and get 12 million km², that is, 12% of the total habitable and usable area of the Earth. Further, we can quite calmly, within the framework of reasonable (without compromising quality and environmental friendliness), engage in improving the efficiency of agriculture and animal husbandry, reducing the rate of acres per 1 person, for example, by half, which is completely correct, and by 2050 we will get a result of 7% of all habitable land occupied to maintain the life of 10 billion people.
And if one of the above profiles is ready to talk to us in the studio of the world media in the complete absence of basic knowledge and lack of calculations: factories 🏭, steamships, power plants and other saechny factories and artels, also requiring space for their placement, then we are ready to consider the rider and make concessions and allocating you time, as well as 3% of arable land, although we understand that this makes no sense, due to your natural unsuitability for work.
In general, 1% would be more than enough, and not necessarily on farmland. Nevertheless, we make concessions to you out of a tendency to sadism and conservative calculations, as well as a child's love for whole and especially round figures, in order to get, for example, the coveted 10% for 10 billion people. of all habitable land.
Thus, we get the final result: the resources of the entire planet are quite enough to maintain the diligent life of 100 billion people and without the need to cause irreversible damage to the Ecology of the Earth. At the same time, not only the existing forests will remain untouched, but also the vast reserves with all their inhabitants without any need to pretend to be the king of nature with the total destruction of nature, as it has long been successfully done in densely populated Europe!
However, no 100 billion kings in the near future, the Earth is not threatened by the calculations of real specialists, whom you do not let close to the screen, buying all the airtime and occupying all the space in it with the show 🎤 business and Hollywood. So, taking into account the natural demographic correlation by the year 2100 on Earth, experts give a figure of no more than 13.3 billion, and according to the most likely forecast - only 11.2 billion people.
That, in fact, is all Comrades Communists Onanists. And for ordinary normal readers, we suggest drawing conclusions themselves from this material.
You don't need to have a big mind to understand what kind of machinators we are dealing with and how valid their exotic theories about the optimal number of the Earth's population and the need for its forced regulation are.
And do not forget the main thing, Friends - it is assumed that the authors of theories and its supporters above with a well-known profile do not fall under this regulation, but we fall with you - those who regularly work and pay taxes - readers and listeners of this terrorist nonsense of celestials with a roof that has gone from money 💵 and low intellectual level (head).
And if somewhere far away people are dying of starvation en masse, then the question is not in overpopulation, but in the monstrous illiteracy of the management of territories. This is the main scourge of the planet, allowing them to dispose of millions of tons of food, because it is much more profitable than feeding the starving.
Get a fascist grenade in the form of your favorite injection.
![](/file/71075de2e3784ee90176e.jpg)
The minister of New South Wales, Australia, where the most anti-Covid draconian totalitarian measures have been imposed, explained at a covid briefing where he made another dumb statement when viewers noticed his lowered eye, explaining what was wrong with him.
The fact is that this freak was vaccinated against false covid, which is also going to be delivered to 24 thousand children the other day. After an mRNA injection, Victor Dominello got a little bad and was diagnosed with Bell's palsy, paralysis of one side of the face.
What's funny, this idiot continues to insist on vaccination, already knowing how it can end, and hopes that his diagnosis will not be an excuse for everyone from it.
"At the morning press conference - several people commented on my lowered eye," the minister signed the photo, apparently not quite at the memory, "Some thought that I was winning back at the operator. Some thought I had a stroke."
Doninello also recalled how on Monday he felt pain in his skull behind his right ear before waking up two days later with "needles" on the right side of his tongue.
"I only checked it out this afternoon – after several people contacted me to see if I was okay," the clown said, "Thank you to everyone who contacted me. The reason I'm posting is because hopefully it will remind people to take care of their health. We're focused on covid, but there are many other health issues. If you have health problems, take care of them."
There is currently no known cure for Bell's palsy. It seems, Friends, even if the ten presidents of the most influential countries die live immediately after vaccination, then this will not stop the fanatical fascists who carry out the will of outright, in the truest sense, Satanists.
![](/file/b4fec23815e6694cc1756.jpg)
Cambodia. Since the start of the mass vaccination campaign, the number of infections and deaths has increased dramatically in the country. This is not the first country where people began to get sick after vaccination. In the same row are now Israel, England and so on.
False Covid, False Vaccines 💉, False Vaccine Booster 💉 have nothing to do with medicine and health, all these are mechanisms for total population control and the transition to electronic money tied to an injection, control of the movement of the population, encouragement of products, the destruction of large masses of people for decades to come. All this is a special operation within the framework of the New Hell, killed in the head of several dozen top officials of major countries of the world, as well as the Bingo lottery, Eldorado, Klondike - to embezzlement of national budgets through the world laundering laundry BigPharma. They're just milking a gullible ignorant plebs paying taxes.
And here's another grim warning from Israel, which has failed to fight false covid despite the plebs vaccine almost completely vaccinated, covid vaccination blunts but doesn't win another lie: Delta.
Israel has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, with 78% of those 12 years and older fully vaccinated, and the vast majority with the Pfizer vaccine.
However, the country currently has one of the highest infection rates in the world, with nearly 650 new cases daily per million people. More than half of them are fully vaccinated.
"This is a very clear warning sign for the rest of the world," says Ran Baliser, chief innovation officer of Clalit Health Services, the largest health organization in Israel. "If it can happen here, it could probably happen everywhere."
What is clear is that "breakthrough" cases are not the rare events that the term implies. As of August 15, 514 Israelis had been hospitalized with severe or critical COVID-19, a 31% increase from just 4 days earlier. Of the 514 people, 59% were fully vaccinated. Of those vaccinated, 87% were over 60 years of age.
"There are so many breakthrough infections that they dominate, and most hospitalized patients are actually vaccinated," says Uri Shalit, a bioinformatician at the Israel Institute of Technology who worked for the government.
https://telegra.ph/BIOLOGICAL-ATTACK-ON-THE-US-POPULATION-08-18
Well, because tests are lies 🤥 lies 🤥 lies. So you can destroy and drive the whole globe crazy in 5-7 years.
![](/file/a474b4d392bfa40fec11f.jpg)
See Roni, now we do this familiar and beloved thing only so. This Is Nou Hao invented on your lawn and it's called sex education of young pidaras, transgenderism ⚧ and other lada and huinya. And the sages came up with such a thing in order to cover the ears of children and young heads that are not stronger in age. In general, the model range can be invented indefinitely, give another 666 names of perversions and Bill will definitely cope with this. Bill will come up with, he is a great dreamer and thinker of the 21st century in this delicate matter. How much do not invent and how not to call - The meaning will not change - Reducing the birth rate and as a consequence the dream of morons - Reducing the population of the already empty land from this small population of the earth today - 7.5 billion people!
![](/file/fc6b518b55dd965b3d1ea.jpg)
https://telegra.ph/GLOBAL-KOGAL-CREATE-ARTIFICIAL-HUNGER-Agro-terrorism-08-10
https://telegra.ph/UNDER-PHILOPHIPH-DAVIDS-TIME--MACHINE-08-10
https://telegra.ph/OVAL-TERRORISTS-07-31
https://telegra.ph/BIOLOGICAL-ATTACK-ON-THE-US-POPULATION-08-18
https://telegra.ph/COVID-19-fabricated-by-war-criminals-is-a-fake-disease-08-18
https://telegra.ph/WELCOME--ALWAYS-YOUR-FRIEND-ALOIZIC-08-17
https://telegra.ph/MEGA--CRIME-OF-THE-21ST-CENTURY-08-17
https://telegra.ph/STATE-BIOTERRORISM-CROWN-08-09
https://telegra.ph/Courts-martial-of-the-United-States-08-09
![](/file/dbe1b81bd47f3da892624.jpg)
Professor McGonagall was directly involved in the work on the material.
Our friendly team of the laboratory 🧫, friends, colleagues in the experiments of Professor 🔬 in the laboratory 🧪 among themselves friendly and loving call Professor Maggie Smith 😘 💐
Lᴀʙᴏrᴀᴛᴏry ᴏf 🧪 Сᴏnᴄᴇᴩᴛiᴏn ᴏn ᴛhᴇ Grᴇᴀᴛ Тiʍᴇ Sᴇgʍᴇnᴛs ᴏf ᴛhᴇ Lᴏng Wᴀy
Ɗʝɾεϲʈσɾ σϝ ʈɦε 𑀝σηϲερʈʝση Lαϸσɾαʈσɾγ Ϻɾ. Ɲʝϻϸɭε Β Ѕρεɾϻ Χ