The science fraud by Prof. Christian Drosten

Prof. Christian Drosten is known today in principle to everyone who has ever heard of Corona, and that should be most of them. Strangely enough, few know about his strange predictions, his contradictions, his dangerous statements, like scaremongering, (1) but worst of all is probably the obvious science fraud Drosten has committed. The question one asks oneself is, does Prof. Drosten do this out of praiseworthy thoughts, in order to regain renown from his massive mistakes (swine flu scandal), or for monetary reasons, (2) or are there even worse reasons that I dare not address. 

I will show in this article that Drosten has lost the scientific codex or does not know it at all. Either would be fatal. Let's get on with it.

The chronological sequence of the PCR test by Prof. Drosten and the Berlin Charité (pay attention to the chronological dates)

On 30.12.2019: the ophthalmologist Li Wenliang informed professional colleagues by whatsapp that there are 7 cases in his hospital that are confirmed positive for SARS. 

On 31.12.2019: the government in Beijing sent an "intervention force" of virologists and epidemiologists to support the cause in Wuhan.

On 01.01.2020: Prof. Christian Drosten from the Charité heard about it and immediately started the development of SARS viruses before it was even clear and could be clear whether the report from China about SARS was true and proven, and above all before the Chinese virologists published their results! He testified that as of January 1, 2020, he had developed a genetic detection method (3) to reliably prove the presence of the new corona virus in humans.

On 21.01.2020 (3 days before the first publication of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CCDC]) the WHO recommended (4) all nations to use the "safe" test procedure developed by Prof. Drosten. 

Fact: Prof. Drosten used scientifically NOT verified data for his rapidly globalized PRC test of the 2019-nCOV, which was renamed SARS-CoV-2 on February 7, 2020 with the participation of Prof. Drosten. This gave the impression that the Chinese had actually discovered a new virus, but this was never the case! (5)

The claim that he has a reliable test procedure is therefore completely impossible. Drosten breaks and disregards the following rules with it.

1. Disregard of the clearly defined rules of science, which are part of his employment contract. (6)

2. The increase and globalisation of the Chinese epidemic panic, in which he violated the thinking and logic of virology.

On 23.01.2020: Publication (7) of the development of the test method of Prof. Drosten. On page 3 of this article, left column, 8 lines from below, he describes the first and decisive step of his approach:

At that time, no clinical data were available that could have been the basis for such a presumption.

I would like to make a very important point at this point.

Regarding SARS-CoV-1 (2003) to which Drosten refers in his test for SARS-CoV-2 (2019), there is a massive problem.

In the publication in NATURE - "Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS(2003) virus" (8) the headline suggests, as so often, that Koch's postulates have been fulfilled. 

There 5 relevant studies are listed. (Also the study by Drosten at that time)

However, it says under MAIN "According to Koch's postulates, as modified by Rivers for viral diseases, six criteria are required to establish a virus as the cause of a disease"

So here it becomes clear that these are not Koch's postulates, but modified postulates. After analyzing the studies, it becomes clear that neither the Koch's postulates nor those of River were followed in the studies. For details please read my article "Leading Corona researchers admit that they have no scientific proof of the existence of a virus". (9)

Already in 2003, SARS-Cov-1 was also thought to be a genetic strand of a new virus, in which Christian Drosten was significantly involved. (10) Only 2 days later, Prof. Drosten offered an alleged test procedure for this thought compound alleged virus (11)(entry on Wikipedia from 29.05.2020)! 

To date, virologists have not been able to detect a SARS virus from a patient, a bat, another animal, or in the laboratory. The assumption of the virologists that there are in fact viral DNA strands that are constructed in the same way as the DNA strands that are thought to be composed of short gene sequences has not yet been confirmed.

Anyone who is fluent in English can directly recognize the fact that the "virus genome" (complete genome) in this publication, in which the RKI played a major role, was constructed only in thought: „Complete Genome Sequence of a Wild-Type Measles Virus Isolated during the Spring 2013 Epidemic in Germany“ (12)
Prof. Mankertz, co-author of this publication and head of the National Reference Institute for Measles, Mumps and Rubella at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), has claimed in response to inquiries that control experiments were carried out for this study, which rule out that typical cell components (expert opinion no.3) are misinterpreted as virus components. (13) However, she refused to hand over the documentation of these control experiments. In her complaint, Prof. Mankertz replied that she did not have any control experiments at all and that her Munich colleagues had certainly carried out and documented these control experiments. Dr. Stefan Lanka wrote to all authors and their laboratory superintendents and asked about the control experiments, which have been mandatory since 1998. None of the authors contacted replied to him. Also the rectors of the addressed institutes did not answer and so the complaint procedure went to nothing.

Only on 24.01.2020 and 03.02.2020: The authoritative virologists of the Chinese disease authority (CCDC) published their results on 24.01.2020 (14) and 03.02.2020. (15) They report on the isolation of "many" short gene sequences, which, when strung together, could represent a genetic strand of a new type of virus. 
The authors expressly pointed out (also all other virologists involved to date "as of 10.07.2020") (16) that the urgently required experiments have not yet been carried out which would allow the claim to be made that it is indeed a genetic strand of a disease-causing virus. 

On the contrary: Chinese virologists even explicitly point out that the constructed genetic strand bears up to 90% similarity to genetic strands of harmless and decades-old corona viruses in bats.

Thus the study of 24.01.2020 under Discussion states: "our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates".

On 30.01.2020: after several previous tests, which always turned out negative, the doctor was finally tested positive with a test. This increased the panic when the eye doctor told the world. (17)

Realization: The all-important and decisive question arises whether Prof. Drosten has fulfilled his scientific duty, which is part of his employment contract (§2 "Principles of Good Scientific Practice"), (18) to himself and consistently verify all assertions made in his publication about the detection method he developed and the public statements based on it.

The answer is a clear NO This central scientific duty gives rise to three central questions:
1. Did Prof. Drosten check whether the gene sequences, which are the basis of his test procedure and which he received from Chinese virologists, are actually sequences that originate from a virus?

2. Did Prof. Drosten carry out the control experiments that are mandatory in science to prove whether the sequences he used actually originated from a virus? Did he carry out the control experiments to prove whether the sequences he uses, which he ascribes to the new virus, are in fact sequences that are not sequences that he ascribes to the new virus, are in fact sequences that are produced in every metabolism, perhaps even in plants, such as Tanzanian papayas (19) (20) or that are produced in a metabolically increased way in diseases?

3. On the basis of which assumptions, experiments and control experiments can Prof. Drosten claim that his test procedure, with which he only detects partial regions of 2 (two) genes from the genome of a total of 10 (ten) genes of the corona virus, detects a whole, active and disease-causing virus? And not just fragments of a virus, (21) after an assumed successful battle of the immune system or the presence of defective or incomplete or harmless viruses in our genetic material, which are typical and make up 50% (according to the virologist Prof. Karin Mölling) of the gene masses of our chromosomes? (22)

Note to Karin Mölling: What Mrs. Mölling does not know or is hiding is the fact that metabolism constantly produces a large amount of RNA gene sequences of any composition, which do not appear in the form of DNA sequences in the chromosomes. This fact calls into question the claims of existence of all RNA viruses, such as corona viruses, Ebola virus, HIV, measles virus and the SARS viruses. This fact is also the basis why with control experiments not only the corona crisis, but the fear and mishandling by the entire virology of the alleged disease viruses is immediately ended. 

Answered in summary: Due to the chronological sequences and the apparent acting out of them the questions are clearly answered "Prof. Drosten" did not answer these questions. Based on reports in the social media, he and his colleagues assumed that a corona virus linked to SARS could be involved in the alleged outbreak of atypical pneumonia. At the time, there was no clinical data available to support such a suspicion.  For the further steps he has taken to expose the fraud, please read the free issue of Dr. Stefan Lanka magazine Wissenschafftplus the article "Misinterpretation Virus Part 2" (23)

For detailed information on PCR tests, read the two articles "PCR: A DNA test becomes a manipulation tool" (24) and "The PCR test is not validated". (25)

Prof. Christian Drosten was reported by Dr. Stefan Lanka 

Prof. Drosten is the main person responsible for the fact that people all over the world have been, and still are, put under living conditions which are defined as crimes against humanity in the International Criminal Code (ICCPR) by means of the assertion of a provenly false fact.

Section 7 of the International Criminal Code (VStGB) defines in (1) as

"Crimes against humanity."

"Whoever, in the course of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population"

2. "with the intention of destroying all or part of a population, places all or part of that population under living conditions likely to bring about its total or partial destruction,".

5. "tortures a person in his custody or otherwise under his control by causing him substantial physical or mental harm or suffering which is not merely the consequence of sanctions permitted under international law".

8. "inflicts serious physical or psychological harm on another person, in particular of the kind referred to in Section 226 of the German Criminal Code,"

Prof. Drosten knows that with his test, even assuming that a SARS-CoV-2 virus would actually exist and that it was proven to have pathogenic properties

- whereby to this day the virologists involved point out that this evidence has not yet been produced (sic!) -,

a. cannot detect an intact, infectious virus, but only fragments that are attributed to the virus;

b. cannot distinguish between endogenous and exogenous substances.

Read more in the newsletter of the "Wissenschafftplus" magazine from 13 June 2020 - Misinterpretation Virus Part 2: Beginning and end of the corona crisis (26)

Prof. Christian Drosten relies on models of those who have always been completely wrong.

The Imperial College in London had published a model, i.e. an extrapolation or prognosis, to put it simply, of how infection figures and deaths will continue, what measures will be necessary, using the example of Great Britain and the USA. There are huge potential mortality rates. It is estimated that more than one in four people over 60 years of age will end up in intensive care. 

How did Drosten assess this calculation? 
"Yes, I can't tell you now how my colleagues judge them, because this study is so new that hardly anyone has had time to read and understand it completely until now. But I also consider this to be a very important study. It is probably also one of the studies that has been behind the decisions of politicians in Great Britain. But here, too, the situation is now the same as here; we have consulted scientists for a long time, and these scientists have also tried to provide very differentiated data. At some point, though, a political decision was taken, and rightly so. We simply have to take political decisions now, where it is said that it is better to do something now than to miss an opportunity of some kind, and then to re-evaluate scientifically how we can take the necessary measures." (27)

The question you have to ask yourself is, if he couldn't even really read the study, and as I'm about to show, one of the people responsible, "Neil Ferguson" also called Mr. Genuis, was completely wrong with all his previous pandemic models, why did he [Drosten] and other [governments] rely on something like that? Turning to Niel Ferguson

The British corona middleman Neil Ferguson, seen but not observed! Through his institute at London's Imperial College, he has great influence on the world's population. He himself is called Mr. Genius when it comes to the projection of computer models of epidemics.

According to the business insider:  "Ferguson's team warned Boris Johnson that the search for 'herd immunity' could cost 510,000 lives, resulting in an abrupt reversal... His simulations have been influential in other countries and have been quoted by authorities in the US, Germany and France" (28) These countries used Ferguson's model as a model and implemented it. The instruction "see source Business-Insider" led to a lockdown in several countries and thus to economic devastation!

So let's take a look at NEIL Ferguson's track record, which is presented in the Business Insider article: "Ferguson co-founded the MRC Centre for Global Analysis of Infectious Diseases based at Imperial in 2008. It is the leading body advising national governments on outbreaks of infectious diseases". ... "It receives tens of millions of dollars in annual funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, works with the UK National Health Service and the US Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), and is responsible for providing the World Health Organization with 'rapid analysis of urgent infectious disease issues'". Does it click with you?

• Gates money goes to Neil Ferguson 
• Gates calls for and promotes vaccines and even more vaccines.
• Gates wants a COVID vaccine before all aspects of the planetary lockdown end. Of course, the lockdowns are already ruining the Earth's economy.

Needless to say, Bill Gates, already known in the mainstream media, is the secret head of the WHO. (29)

Niel Ferguson provides the US CDC and WHO with a frightening computer projection of COVID deaths. Ferguson thus provides a rationale for the Gates vaccine plan. 

The CDC and WHO act on the basis of what Gates wants, as Ferguson puts it. So we've come full circle.

National governments capitulate to the WHO and the CDC. They are implementing a LOCKDOWN!

And here it comes! "Michael Thrusfield, Professor of Veterinary Epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh, told the paper he had 'déjà vu' after reading the [Ferguson] Imperial paper [on COVID] that Ferguson was responsible for the excessive culling of animals during the 2001 foot-and-mouth outbreak."
...
"Ferguson warned the government that 150,000 people could die. 6 million animals were slaughtered as a precautionary measure, costing the country billions in agricultural revenue. In the end, 200 people died."
...
"Similarly, Niel Ferguson was accused of creating panic by overestimating the possible number of fatalities during the 2005 bird flu outbreak. Ferguson estimated that 200 million people could die. The actual number was in the low hundreds".

This man was therefore demonstrably always wrong and spread incredible panic through his computer models, which had nothing to do with reality. But exactly this man is being followed by Prof. Drosten on his feet!

"In 2009, one of Ferguson's models predicted that 65,000 people could die from the swine flu outbreak in Britain - the final number was less than 500."

So you have to ask yourself, why would anyone believe what Ferguson predicted in this COVID hype? Are his fellow experts and/or the presidents/ prime ministers so "stupid"? Probably some of them are, others know it, but don't dare to say anything (we are currently seeing this from many lawyers and doctors), some are involved and want to create new structures, destroy economies and lead us into a new world order. (30)

He has written the story, entirely clothed in a computer model, composed by a man with a past full of pitiful and devastating failures.

Neil Ferguson is the mind in the machine. The machine is the World Health Organization and the CDC. The man behind the ghost is Bill Gates.

As chance would have it, on May 5, 2020, the news comes that government scientist Neil Ferguson is stepping down. (31)

It is not only the entanglements of the same people coming back again and again that worries me, but also the complete ignorance of a faulty past. It's not as if those responsible didn't know that. With all the knowledge we have today, one can no longer speak of ignorance, but must start out from full intention. 

Prof. Drosten and the swine flu scandal

I do not want to list the complete swine flu scandal here, you can watch the excellent documentary from Arte - "Profiteers of fear" (32) and read the article "Swine flu 2.0" at Rubikon. (33)

I would like to reproduce a statement by Drostens from "Profiteers of fear", which was answered so appropriately by Raphael in his Video on his website Viaveto.de published on 22.03.2020 (34) that I agree with this description 100%. It could not have been expressed better.

It's worth watching the whole film "Profiteers of fear", but especially a special interview contribution first made me feel very exhilarated, then taught me the shudder. A virologist spoke about how viruses should change (from min. 27:30)

Quote: "You could say that this virus could take over certain gene segments from very dangerous other viruses, such as bird flu viruses, and then become a very dangerous virus. But even there, always, one must say with caution: the current virus is actually already very, very successful and one wonders what such a virus would gain from it. Because such a sudden leap in mutation is almost always accompanied by the virus being worse off than before, at least for a while. Because the virus does not want to kill people, the virus simply wants to exist. It can do this particularly well if its hosts continue to move inconspicuously in their social environment, i.e. are not seriously ill."

I almost collapsed from laughter because of the sheer ridiculousness and the quasi-religious, medieval belief in demons behind it. Then I decided to go back and see who's been yapping that nonsense. And to my quickly emerging horror, it was actually Prof. Christian Drosten, who developed the current Corona PCR test and is known as the co-discoverer of the cute corona viruses.

The faith behind these statements is for me marked by an almost incomprehensible, childish ignorance. The alleged virus, i.e. a simple membrane envelope with RNA content, is assumed to have a will and the ability to make decisions! It is assumed that the virus is able to make a mutation leap deliberately when it feels bad (whatever that may mean; how does a membrane-enveloped RNA feel bad?) (nothing about "random mutations", the virus decides when it mutates)! The virus should have an instinct for survival (it doesn't want to kill, it wants to exist)!

Such an abysmally silly humanization cannot even be called unscientific anymore. This is pure pre-scientific, infantile belief. After the many, many years of dealing with the nonsense that is being passed off as modern science, it is not easy to surprise or even shock me with nonsensical statements. But this presentation, combined with the position this man holds today, really appalls me. It is the most pithily stupid thing I have heard from academics in the last ten years. But it does make a lot of sense in terms of virology.

Interesting facts about Prof. Christian Drosten

1. Drosten called already with the swine flu rashly to get vaccinated (35)
2. The vaccine Pandemrix, which Drosten rashly demanded without data in 2009, proved to be a catastrophe both for the safety of the medicine. [Countless vaccinated people fell ill with narcolepsy as a result of the vaccination. (36) (37)] and for the national budget (hundreds of millions of euros of purchased vaccine had to be destroyed). [On a fictitious ranking list, who would have completely disqualified himself as a political advisor for the evaluation of epidemic risks for related vaccines in the history of medicine, no one comes after this undisputed pole position (Drosten) by far...]
3. Drosten demands: "We must override regulations for vaccines". (38) It is actually unbelievable how someone, who in 2009, due to his completely wrong assessment of the vaccine, even demands today that the regulations be repealed. I am really stunned!
4. A short excerpt from "Drostens fascistoid fantasies": (39) And the authors of the British study answer the question about the voluntariness of the app irritatingly: of course the app had to be voluntary, like in China, where the app was "not compulsory but was required to move between quarters and into public spaces and public transport". A deeply disturbing understanding of "not compulsory" for authors of a democratic society... . The fact that the de facto exclusive advisor of the German government in the discussion about the use of apps in the pandemic does not raise his voice unmistakably warning here and takes up the cudgels for the existing data-saving and human rights respecting alternative, but even beyond the Chinese-inspired British model fantasized about totalitarian surveillance and isolation strategies in the hands of artificial intelligence and algorithms, Christian Drosten once again disqualifies as an advisor to a democratically legitimized government whose actions must be based on the free democratic basic order.
5. Cooperation of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation with Lothar Wieler from RKI and Christian Drosten from the Berliner Charité. (40)
6. Although the many side effects of mRNA vaccines are known, as well as the massive side effects of nanoparticles (41) | (42) | (43) present in the vaccine, Drosten comes up with the following words: "Gene-based vaccines have potential". (44)
7. As part of the NDR podcast series "The Coronavirus Update with Christian Drosten" Christian Drosten, the director of the Charité and virologist, talks about the coronary crisis.  André Barmettler, publisher of the newspaper "Express Zeitung", listens a bit closer and finds a prospective salesman who presents his only solution to the people who are terrified, but not without getting lost in contradictions and using evil sales tricks such as Hegel's dialectic. Listen carefully to what the "star virologist" has to say! (45)
8. Virologist Drosten about his test: I quote: "Sure: Towards the end of the course, the PCR is sometimes positive and sometimes negative. That's where chance comes in. If patients are tested negative twice and released as cured, positive test results may well be obtained again at home This is therefore far from being a reinfection." (46)
9. Drosten has repeatedly spread panic: "it's going to be very bad" (47) or Drosten warns of dangerous background effects, (48) and also warns of a second wave, (49) although there has not yet been a first. "it's getting a little scary" - corona mutation? (50) Drosten dares a worrying prognosis. As we now know, at no time was there any danger.
10. Drosten and the kids - numbers with a purpose... - 30.04.2020 Who in advance - like Drosten here - publicly formulates clear questions and then interprets the results of scientific studies in such a way, let us express it cautiously: one-sidedly and as a virologist again formulates political demands in scientific works not even hidden ("Based on these results, we have to caution against an unlimited re-opening of schools and kindergartens in the present situation" - Jones 2020), disqualifies himself (once again) as an unbiased advisor of a democratic government. (51) Addition: Questionable methods - Drosten study on infectious children grossly wrong (52)
11. Cambridge Statistician: Drosten study withdrawn, admit mistakes - 27.05. 2020 The renowned statistician and risk researcher David Spiegelhalter from the University of Cambridge now joins the ranks of renowned epidemiologists and statisticians, some of whom have sharply criticized the study by chief coronologist Drosten on the alleged infectivity of children. (53)
12. After Prof. Drosten had already been involved in a scuffle with several news outlet, BILD, Spiegel etc., Alexander Kekulé (director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology) and Drosten also got into an argument. Kekulé - "Recalculating the statistics cannot save the current work", (54) Drosten twittered on this: "Kekulé makes mood. His presentation is tendentious. He doesn't know our data and quotes wrong. Kekulé himself couldn't be criticized, he would have to publish something first." (55) So you see what's happening here. It's like a Punch and Judy show. All this is happening even though there is no evidence of SARS-CoV-2.  (56)
13. Jan Fleischhauer on the diva of the Charité - 08.06.2020 - For the infallible Dr. Drosten there are very special rules. (57)
14. After all the brazenness and false statements that have led to health problems, Drosten attacks his "colleagues" in all seriousness. (58) | (59)

Translated & reblogged Version - Original here

Telegraph main page with overview of all articles: Link

Visit our Telegram Channel for additional news & information: Link

Chat with like-minded in our Telegram Chat Group: Link

Please support to keep this blog alive: paypal

References:

(1) It's gonna be bad - "Maybrit Illner" on the coronavirus

(2) The Golden Boy - Could it be that Mr Drosten's steamy chatter conceals something other than humanistic philanthropy?

(3) Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR -

(4) Diagnostics: first test for novel coronavirus developed

(5) Leading Corona researchers admit that they have no scientific proof for the existence of a virus

(6) New Version of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Statute Ensuring Good Scientific Practice of 20 June 2012 (AMB Charité No. 092, p. 658) 

(7) see 3

(8) Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus

(9) Leading Corona researchers admit that they have no scientific proof of the existence of a virus

(10) The responsibility of a virologist - Is Christian Drosten victim or perpetrator?

(11) Severe acute respiratory syndrome

(12) Complete Genome Sequence of a Wild-Type Measles Virus Isolated during the Spring 2013 Epidemic in Germany

(13) The Federal Supreme Court destroys the belief in viruses

(14) A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019

(15) A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China

(16) Leading Corona researchers admit that they have no scientific proof for the existence of a virus

(17) Are Coronavirus Tests Accurate?

(18) see 6

(19) Tanzania tests motor oil, plants and various animals on Corona with amazing results.

(20) President queries Tanzania coronavirus kits after goat test

(21) PCR: A DNA test becomes a instrument for manipulation

(22) see 21

(23) Misinterpretation of virus - Beginning and end of the Corona crisis

(24) see 21

(25) The PCR test is not validated 

(26) see 23

(27) Coronavirus update: Need abbreviations for vaccine approval

(28) How 'Professor Lockdown' helped save tens of thousands of lives worldwide - and carried COVID-19 into Downing Street

(29) The secret head of WHO is Bill Gates

(30) Merkel pleads for a new world order at Davos

(31) Exclusive: Government scientist Neil Ferguson resigns after breaking lockdown rules to meet his married lover

(32) Profiteers of Fear - Vaccine marketing with invented pandemics

(33) Swine flu 2.0 - The way politics and the media deal with the corona virus is reminiscent of the fake pandemic in 2009.

(34) Corona - Eine epidemische Massenhysterie DEUTSCH

(35) "The wave has started"

(36) Current information on narcolepsy in the temporal context of A/H1N1 influenza vaccination

(37) Serious risks with Pandemrix and Gardasil (WDR Westpol); with english subtitle

(38) Virologist Drosten: "We must override regulations for vaccines"

(39) Coronoia - Drostens fascistoid fantasies from 1984

(40) What is the government keeping from us?

(41) Federal Environment Agency warns against nanotechnology

(42) Nanoparticles can cause cancer

(43) Nanoparticles: Cute little killers

(44) Coronavirus update: Gene-based vaccines have potential

(45) Christian Drosten unmasking honestly (spoken German with English subtitle)

(46) Twitter Statement from Christian Drosten

(47) see 1

(48) Worries about the unexpected impact of the wave of infection: Drosten warns of dangerous background effects

(49) Is the second wave coming? Kekulé and Drosten fear another rise in the virus

(50) "It's a little scary" - Corona mutation? Drosten dares a disturbing prognosis

(51) Drosten and the children - Numbers with a goal

(52) Drosten study on infectious children grossly wrong

(53) Cambridge Statistician: Withdraw Drosten study, admit errors - 27.05.2020

(54) "Recalculating the statistics can't save the current work"

(55) Drosten Twitter statement

(56) see 16

(57) For the infallible Dr. Drosten there are very special rules

(58) Reliable Sources

(59) Drosten and over 100 doctors warn of lie pandemic