STATE MEGA CRIME 👑21ST CENTURY.
Covid-19 is a 100% special operation. It's a 100% lie and a false pandemic. These are 100% false poisonous ☠️ drugs called vaccines. This special operation has been actively prepared for the last 8 years to create a futuristic world where there will be no nation-states, familiar to almost all countries of market relations based on labor and competition. It is difficult for us even to write on this topic, it is easier to say this is the most perfect nonsense of mentally unhealed marasmatics. There are no more than 100 of them as the main conspirators and state criminals. And in general, there are already tens, even hundreds of thousands of criminals around the world. All for their beloved NWO (War Communism).
NWO for a very narrow group of people of world domination.
The history of the creation of the New World Order
The New Order is the ideal of a society in which social harmony is realized, absolute order is realized. The dream of an ideal social order, the New Order, first appeared in ancient Greece, and the basic principles of this ideal were formulated by Plato in the book "Utopia", but the ideas of the New Order remained in oblivion until the Protestant Reformation.
During this period, under the influence of Plato's ideas, socialist utopias were written by Thomas More and Campanella, and they were associated with the discovery of a new continent, America.
Only in the New World it was possible to realize the dream of mankind of an ideal society, since, according to the humanistic thinkers of this time, the Old World, mired in vices, was doomed, and in Europe there were no forces capable of clearing these Augean stables. The hero of Thomas More's Utopia, Gitlodey, participating in the journey of Amerigo Vespucci, asks to leave him on an island near the American continent, where he gets into the state of Utopia, living according to the laws established by the wise legislator Utop.
There is no private property in Utopia. All citizens without exception work, "no one sits idly and everyone is engaged in his craft." The exception is not the ruling elite, but the official bureaucracy, the bureaucracy, which devotes itself to creating laws and restoring order.
All products of labor are distributed evenly. Everyone's clothes are the same, as are the dwellings and the cities themselves, which "are so similar to each other that whoever sees one city will recognize all the cities of Utopia." The principle of standardizing life in the "right" society appeared in the earliest socialist theories and experiments.
A hundred years after the appearance of Utopia, Campanella's City of the Sun was published, which describes in more detail, with many details, a society built on the same principles of equality and standardization. Work is mandatory for everyone. Wives are common. Children are brought up not by parents, but by society. Deviations from generally accepted norms of behavior and uniformity of clothing are followed by cruel punishments. The principles of life proposed by utopians later came to be called socialism.
But, even before their scientific justification by the humanists of the Enlightenment, the ideas of socialism were applied in practice in the medieval communes-sects of the Anabaptists, Cathars, Hussites, Albigus, Moravian brothers and many others.
The life of each of the sects was limited to only a few years, primarily because they did not have an economic base - land, land belonged to the hereditary aristocracy, so the practice of communes - heretical sects of the Middle Ages, could not spread to the whole society. The American Puritans, unlike their European predecessors, had an economic basis for building God's kingdom on earth. Land in America belonged to those who cultivated it. The Puritans, who established the first colonies in the New World, saw their future as a model for the rest of the world.
The first British colonists, at Plymouth in the north and at Georgetown in the south, conducted experiments in the creation of the New Order. Captain Smith, the first leader of the community in Georgetown, introduced the principle of life, expressed by the idea of early Christianity, expressed by the Apostle Paul, "Who does not work, he does not eat." The next stage in the development of this idea was the formula "Time-Money", which grew out of the Protestant postulate that every hour spent in inactivity is stolen from labor for the glory of the Lord.
Starting with collective, communal farming, the first American colonists soon moved on to a more productive version of the economy based on individual interest. But attempts to create a collectivist model of the New Order continued into the 19th century.
Historian Kumar, "More communism was practiced in 19th-century America than at any other time, in any other country." In its system, the society consists of phalansters, each phalanster, which includes 1620 people, is housed in one six-story building with several buildings, where each of the buildings is intended for work, public meetings and recreation. Fourier believed that all the diversity of human types is exhausted by 810, so the entire population of the phalanster was classified according to its typical psychological and physical qualities. Everyone does their job and gets their share of entertainment. "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his work." The distribution of pleasures and entertainments according to this principle was to become the means that would maintain order in the phalanster.
Another utopian communist, Robert Owen, was the first to coin the word socialism, and the first commune he created in the United States, New Harmony, was a factory owned by members of a cooperative commune. Subsequently, it became a model of rational conduct of industrial production.
Fourier's utopia was anti-industrial. The members of the Fourier phalanxes worked, but did only what was attractive to them, doing unpleasant work for everyone in turn. Groups within the phalanx were formed not on the basis of production relations, but on the principle of personal attraction to each other, according to Fourier, on passions, on the absolute value of the individual and self-expression in various forms of activity.
Fourier believed that the satisfaction of the instincts, the passions of the individual, is the main force for the development of society - "There is not a single passion that is useless or bad, they are all the embodiment of the qualities given to man by nature, i.e. God." Moral principles that prohibit the manifestation of the natural qualities of man are harmful because they forbid man to manifest his divine nature. "All these philosophical twists, which are called duty, are invented by people, and passions, drives, are given by God."
Labor is necessary only to create the most necessary, and the creation and accumulation of wealth, as the goal of society, contradicts the true goal of the individual - self-realization in the creative process of communication with other people, in happiness, enjoyment of life itself.
The center of Fourier's concept was the individual, the personality, the flowering of which, in all its manifestations, should be helped in every possible way by society. The collective, according to Fourier, is a collection of personalities in which all the qualities of a person, suppressed in a "normal" society, freely blossom, and the narrowing of a person to the "norm" is nothing but the destruction of the individual.
But all American communes built on a collective economy had short lives, as universal equality led to universal poverty. The commune "New Harmony", created by Robert Owen, was founded in 1825 and lasted 3 years, Etienne Cabé in Illinois created "Ikaria" in 1850 - existed for 5 years, Wilhelm Weitling "Commune" in 1851, in Iowa, 5 years.
American communist experiments could not but attract the attention of Russian socialists. According to Korolenko, "Emigration to America attracted many Russians who dreamed of communist experiments."
Of all the social utopias, Fourier's communist utopia was the closest to the general ideals of the Russian intelligentsia. The fourth dream of Natalia Pavlovna in Chernyshevsky's novel was a literary interpretation of Fourier's idea of free love. Dostoevsky, for his participation in the circle of Petrashevtsy who studied the ideas of Fourier, paid with hard labor. Fourier's ideas were popular in Russia among the Russian intelligentsia, brought up on european individualistic culture, but they could not be instilled in a country where more than 90% of the population was illiterate and lived in conditions built on the collectivism of the rural community, without any ties with the world culture.
However, the ideals of the pre-revolutionary intelligentsia were used by the Bolsheviks, and Fourier's ideas were included, as an important component, in the slogans of Soviet propaganda, the flowering of the personality was declared the goal of communism.
Fourier's ideas, however, were not popular in American society, which was built on the principle of individual interest, and the personality itself was evaluated only by the amount of wealth created by man. The Fourier system, in which relations within society were built on the principles of trust and selflessness, contradicted the basic postulates of universal competition and individual success. But, although the Fourier system was rejected, the ideas of other educators, Rousseau, Saint-Simon, Diderot, Voltaire were used.
The central theme of the Enlightenment is the liberation of the natural principle in man, but the natural can be understood in different ways, it can be kindness and responsiveness, selfishness is also natural, caring only for oneself. Of all the natural qualities of man, America singled out those that corresponded to the conditions of competition, struggle for power and wealth. They arose organically, without external pressure, in the process of survival, the struggle of all with everyone. Europe, following in the same direction, in the education of the "natural qualities" necessary for the development of the economy, used traditional methods - state violence.
In Britain in the second half of the 19th century, unemployed urban dwellers and landless peasants were forced into factories, where they lived in workers' barracks under army discipline. Long before the British experience, in the early 19th century, Arakcheev conducted a successful but local experiment in the creation of labor camps, military settlements. In Russia of that time, his experience was not instilled, but the Bolsheviks managed to reproduce it on a different, mass basis, on the scale of the whole country, when, on the initiative of Trotsky, labor armies began to be created.
America did not follow the European path of barracks socialism and had other means of educating the masses. Forced labour was not necessary, for immigrants from all over the world voluntarily accepted living conditions in which the factory, factory and slum workers, consisting of family huts around, were only the temporary epicenter of their existence, the first stage of their life in a new country providing opportunities that they did not have in the countries from which they came. The centuries-old dream of mankind about a welfare society began to be first realized in the life of the United States, where its basis was created, the production of mass consumption products, which turned into a tool for educating the masses.
For centuries, religion was the main social institution that regulated all aspects of life, educating morality, morality (public interest), rules of behavior. But religion did not seek to improve the living conditions of people, it simply did not set itself such a task. The Protestant Reformation that followed the Renaissance proclaimed the values of a new, bourgeois class - labor of the highest religious value. Catholicism spoke of man as the center of the universe, but was unable to change people's lives for the better and began to cede its position to Protestantism, in which man is valuable only because of what he creates.
The Protestant Reformation was the first true revolution in the history of Europe, it turned the direction of civilization by 180 degrees, it changed the foundations of the worldview of all the peoples inhabiting Europe. All subsequent revolutions were only a continuation and development of the fundamental ideas of that era.
"Give people daily bread, and then ask them about spiritual life" was the main postulate of the Enlightenment, the heir to the Protestant Reformation. The materialist worldview was instilled in science, which the Enlightenment turned into a new form of religion.
In the 19th century, the century of Progress, science became the driving force of industrial society, it created new, efficient methods of production and effective methods of control of workers, and their result was enormous material wealth. The leader in the introduction of a new, scientific approach to production was the United States.
Lenin wrote in 1918 "... (it is necessary) to introduce a scientific American system throughout Russia. ... Labor productivity is in the last count, the most important, the most important for the victory of the new social system. The main thing for us is the scientific organization of work and control."
Lenin, speaking of the scientific American system, was referring to the system created by Henry Ford, who, in his political views, was a socialist. Ford built houses for workers, crèches and schools for children. Evening schools and refresher courses were created. Workers received loans for the purchase of houses from the administration of the plant, not from banks, and with less interest than in banks, and had the right to buy their company's cars at reduced prices. Workers in Ford's factories depended on their employer not only economically. Saloons, movie theaters, entertainment centers in the Detroit area were controlled by Ford. The security of Ford's factories of 5,000 people monitored not only the order in production, but also the private lives of workers. It was an attempt to "build socialism in one single campaign", no wonder Ford's empire was called "Ford's socialism".
Ford formulated the ideas of the New Order not in political but in economic terms: "Social change must come not as a result of a political revolution, but in the process of economic evolution. The culture of machine production must become a culture of life, our universal future, and the United States will be the leader on this path."
This culture of the society-machine later came to be called "corporate socialism" when the state began to merge with corporations into one system. Benito Mussolini called this system fascism, "Fascism can be called Corporatism, because it is a fusion of the state and the power of corporations."
Ford saw the future in the corporate system and provided enormous financial and technical assistance to the pioneers who began to build corporate (state) socialism in other countries, Germany and the Soviet Union. The opposition of the civilized world to the New Order in Germany and Russia did not negate the fact that all countries, each in its own way, built their own version of society-machine, in which, as the poet of the revolution Mayakovsky said: "The lord of the world will be labor."
An American lawyer who visited the Soviet Union in 1931 - "The living conditions here remind me of the state of affairs at home. The same enthusiasm, the same desire to succeed in the industry, the same energy and passion. There is also a parallel in the mobilization of patriotic feelings and social activities."
The countries that built the New Order differed in their practices, but the ideological postulates they proclaimed largely coincided. So Bernard Shaw noted - "Stalin's constitution looks as if it was written by Thomas Payne (one of the creators of the American Constitution)." The political demagoguery of the countries that built the New Order was largely indentical, while the differences in the practice of implementing this idea were associated with various historical traditions, culture and self-consciousness of the peoples of these countries.
Especially difficult tasks faced the Bolsheviks - it was necessary to change the negative attitude to work, which came from the centuries-old Russian experience, the work itself did not bring tangible results. The need was to foster a new attitude to the economy and labor. The Soviet slogan "Labor is a matter of honor and valor" was a paraphrase of the main idea of Protestantism "Labor service to God", which was deeply alien to the Russian consciousness, brought up on the Orthodox idea, "Labor is a curse to man for his sins."
It was necessary to teach people to work, to educate a new attitude to work, and for this it was necessary not only repressive, but also a huge propaganda apparatus. On the initiative of Lenin, in the early twenties, the CIT, the Central Institute of Labor, was created. The Soviet leadership of the country began a campaign to educate new ethical categories, labor discipline, asceticism in behavior and desires. The need for a new science, anthropology, the science of creating, constructing a new man was also widely discussed. In the West, it received another name - social engineering.
The qualities that the "New Soviet Man" was supposed to possess almost entirely coincided with the Protestant ethic of work and ascetic life, but they did not give the same results as in the United States, where they naturally led to a visual improvement in living conditions.
American propaganda, unlike the propaganda of the Bolsheviks, did not call for self-sacrifice in the name of lofty goals, it acted from the opposite, "Think only about yourself, about your personal well-being, and by this you will increase your wealth and the wealth of the whole society." In the United States, labor, as the meaning of human life, was proclaimed not only by Protestant ethics, it was also proclaimed state policy and ideology. Thus, President Calvin Coolidge in 1927, put forward, as the basis of American ideology, the slogan "American business is business".
Already in the time of Alexis Tocqueville, in the first third of the 19th century, an order of relations began to take shape, which he called the "despotism of democracy": "... it (democracy) covers the entire surface of society with a grid of small but complex rules, they are imperceptible and uniform, and therefore even the strongest minds and the most energetic people are not able to penetrate into the essence of what is happening. No one can rise above the understanding of the manipulated crowd, including the manipulators themselves."
The traditions of individualism made it possible to manipulate the "crowd of dictators" through the idea of personal success, which was understood as an economic interest, and this narrow sphere was easily superimposed by a "grid of small but complex rules." People with one life goal can be easily manipulated, because in the process of achieving their individual goals, they lose interest in what is happening outside of their only goal. Everything that exists outside the economic sphere loses its attractiveness for them, and this "economic man" with all his lifestyle forms and strengthens a total system of control.
Using a constant and imperceptible but all-encompassing press, economic democracy blocks any resistance, "... and as a result, the whole nation becomes a herd of cowardly but industrious animals, doing all that the shepherds require of them. It's slavery of a special nature, it offers various forms of external freedom, imperceptibly and gently depriving them of internal freedom."
The New Order, which began its triumphal march in Europe, Russia and the United States, took various forms, used various methods, but there was one tendency to destroy the old ideas of good and evil, religious morality, morality, and create a new vision of the world, a new morality, a new morality.
The credo of the Bolsheviks, "Morally all that is useful for the revolution." The credo of economic democracy, "Morally all that is useful for economic growth." American democracy created a new morality by using the most flexible and adaptable religion, Protestantism, its authority, modifying and adapting religious morality to the needs of economic growth.
The European countries that built socialism were supposed to neutralize the influence of religion on the masses, but it had deep roots in the public consciousness, so Nazi propaganda gradually supplanted the ideals of religion with the mythology of Aryan, barbaric, pre-Christian civilization. Italian fascism tried to reconstruct the barbaric, pre-Christian Ancient Rome. Christian morality, with its compassion for the weak, had to give way to the ideals of a Force capable of remaking the world.
The most effective was the position of American democracy, which used the ideas of Protestantism to create new forms of social relations. American Protestantism differed from its European version in that it introduced into Christianity not only a powerful element of rationalism and pragmatism, but also the idea of a constant adaptation of religion to the changing conditions of social life.
Popular culture, which first appeared in the United States, as well as science, has become an effective means of changing public consciousness. Adapting to the requirements of the market, mass culture instilled new values of life based on economic interest, and, in the process of the universal race for material wealth, eternal values, morality, morality, spiritual principle, lost any meaning.
What was the reason for the emergence of socialism as a real social practice of total control? Where is the dividing place between capitalism and socialism. Lenin believed that socialism "comes from capitalism, historically develops from capitalism, is the result of the action of such a social force that is born of capitalism."
If we continue Lenin's logic, socialism is nothing else, the next stage of capitalism. Socialism, whatever form it takes, first of all abolishes the main postulate of traditional religion, the priority of spirit over matter - the meaning of human life primarily in the satisfaction of material needs.
"Socialism is flesh from the flesh of capitalism, they strive for complete power over humanity, and their goal is to control the most intimate spheres of the human spirit."
Even before the advent of socialism in European countries, many Marxists saw the United States as a country in which socialism had already begun to be built. Michael Harrington, founder of the Democratic Socialism Party (the predecessor of the Communist Party USA), declared in 1907, "What is commonly called Americanism is socialism in a specific American form."
The American sociologist Samson said the same thing in 1937, "The American idea that anyone can become a capitalist is a variant of socialism with an individualistic refrain."
Leon Trotsky, after spending two months in the United States and leaving America for Russia in 1917 to build a new world, wrote, "I left America with the feeling of a man who only with one eye looked inside the forge where the fate of mankind will be forged."
In the period between the First and Second World War, almost all the countries of Europe began to build socialism, although their pace of development was limited by the post-war devastation. Russia in 1917, in 1924 Italy, in 1933 Germany, which announced the construction of a "New Order in the Millennial Reich", then France, Spain, Bulgaria, Romania and others. Some countries chose the path of National Socialism by joining the fascist coalition, while others joined the World Socialist International.
The German fascist party was officially called the "Workers' National Socialist Party", and had the same social program as the workers' parties of other countries: "We demand that the government provide citizens with jobs and guarantee a living wage. Workers must share in the profits of large enterprises. Freedom of the selfish interests of the individual must not be allowed. It is not society that is subordinate to the individual, but the individual who is subordinate to the interests of society. Programmes to help the elderly should be expanded. A system of public free education for the poor in universities should be established. The state should improve the public health system, take under its protection children and mothers, and prohibit child labor."
Totalitarianism today is associated with fascism and Soviet communism - with torchlight processions, bonfires from books, with the Gestapo and the SS, the KGB, the Gulag and the genocide of entire peoples. But the state and economic structure of fascist Germany and Soviet Russia, at its core, was not much different from democratic countries. The difference was in the idea of the place of man in the system – the interests of the state are more important than the interests of the individual, which was part of the public consciousness, part of German and Russian culture, national traditions.
In democracies, the individual did not belong to the state, he belonged to the economic machine.
"Death camps and labor camps were not a deviation from the basic ideas of industrial society, they were built on the principles of rationalism, bureaucratization and standardization characteristic of any production. The concentration camp brought to its logical conclusion the idea of the priority of economics over human life.
"The Holocaust could not have happened in pre-industrial society. The destruction procedure was rationalized and standardized in full accordance with the requirements of modern production." German sociologist Sigmund Baumann.
Pre-industrial society did not have the technical capacity to create concentration camps, but the idea of a concentration camp was, it arose in the 18th century, in the Age of Enlightenment. "Only those who work and are useful to society should live, the rest should be destroyed," wrote one of the educators, Saint-Simon.
The 18th century prepared the theoretical basis for the transition to the New Order, the 19th century began to create a technical base, by the beginning of the twentieth century it was built, which made it possible to bring ideas to life. The Nazis called Germany the Third Reich for a reason. The Third Reich was the direct heir of kaiser's Germany, the Second Reich, which created a powerful industry and organizational structure, totalitarian in nature. The fascists did not create a totalitarian system anew, it already existed, this is evidenced by the very period during which it was created (rather recreated) - six years. What the fascists brought to the life of Germany was only the state ideology. Fascism, in Italy and Spain, could not even come close to the German, rigid model of totalitarianism, they had neither a developed economy nor the traditions of a strong state. But all the industrialized countries of the world, regardless of the ideology proclaimed, moved in the same direction.
"Had Germany not declared war on the entire civilized world, the destruction of the population groups that interfere with the concentration of power and the establishment of absolute and undisguised control over the life of all strata of society would have gone more or less unnoticed, the capitalist world, with its priority of materialistic values, would have come to terms with the excesses of its economic and commercial partner ... fascism is only a crude, primitive form of capitalist democracy." german philosopher Adorno.
Totalitarian countries used state violence to build a powerful war economy, and created it in a short time. But in peacetime, in a peaceful economy, state violence is not productive. Germany and Russia destroyed vast labor resources and spent huge sums of money on the repressive apparatus.
Democracy uses the form of a business contract, in which the population receives tangible compensation for subordination to the interests of the economy. Therefore, the masses abandoned the old ideas about the purposes of human life and accepted their role as cogs of the economic machine, voluntarily, under contract.
The American political scientist Galbright called this process convergence, the convergence of two systems that seem to contradict each other. "In fact, after all, the two ideological forces that opposed most of the twentieth century, argued only about the details of the same bright future. Not ideals, but methods distinguished them from each other." Russian journalist Genis.
For the philosophers of the Frankfour school, Fromm, Adorno, Marcuse, who saw the process of creating a totalitarian fascist regime in Germany, and fled from it in the United States, the specifics of American life did not prevent them from seeing in the country of the most advanced democracy the familiar features of totalitarianism. Soviet dissidents, Solzhenitsyn and Alexander Zinoviev, once in the West, intended to find true democracy here, and found the same thing that they fought in the Soviet Union, only in other, more sophisticated and more civilized forms.
Pope John Paul II, a former Polish prelate who devoted much of his life to fighting the Soviet version of socialism, in his 1998 encyclical, noted that today's capitalism has evolved into an improved version of communism.
Hannah Arendt, in her book The Origins of Totalitarianism, said that, for the average person, totalitarianism has become so pervasive and habitual that he no longer pays attention to it. [...] To create a system of total control, technological civilization has provided a huge set of tools that implement a comprehensive regulation of the forms of social life, replacing the diversity of social ties with those few that are purely functional in nature.
By manipulating individual interest, the system creates public consensus, total support, and violence ceases to be a necessity. Modern methods of creating the New Order are in no way associated with what was happening in fascist Germany and the Soviet Union. It is believed that the ideology of fascism, communism and the ideology of modern liberalism are antipodes. Liberals have traditionally taken anti-fascist positions, they were at the forefront of the struggle against totalitarian regimes, but the idea of the endless development of the economy, on which liberalism stands, turns the individual into a faceless part of the mass, the economy standardizes all aspects of society control becomes more total than in all its previous, violent forms.
Marxism declared that society lived according to unshakable historical laws, reducing the complexity of social development to the struggle of classes. Economic liberalism speaks of the existence of other laws, the laws of the free market, in which there is no class struggle, but only a struggle between individuals.
The license to know the truth of the laws of history led the Soviet system, with its "scientific communism," to a complete collapse. Today, the place of communist ideology with its "scientific" nature is occupied by no less "scientific" ideology of the free market. Happiness will come to humanity as a result of society's subordination to the requirements of the market. And the market will be able to fully use all its gigantic potential, creating a standard price tag for all forms of human relations. Everything should be put on the market - love and hate, respect and contempt, ideals and beliefs. Everything has to be sold and bought. The simplicity and convenience of this system is obvious, the economic approach to all problems simplifies the complexity and intricacy of human life, it introduces into the framework of the standard the conditions of life, all forms of relations, behavior, thinking, culture.
"The complete unification of life, like an asphalt roller, aligns, flattens the landscape of society and leads us to totalitarianism," noted Bernard Rosenberg, author of popular culture, in 1957. The point of reference in the emergence of totalitarian forms is the emergence of fascism.
Alex Tocqueville, 1836, "I think that the power of the means of control over society that democracy possesses is not comparable to anything that existed in the past. I am afraid that in the future society will create unified institutions, the same dreams and desires for everyone, standard manners of behavior ... There will be no thirst for new ideas, and a person will senselessly spend his energy on achieving some nonsense. External movement will occur constantly, but humanity will stop in the process of its true development."
Materials on the special operation corona 🤴 here ⬇️
https://telegra.ph/Coronaviruses--Coronaviridae-1968-09-03
https://telegra.ph/Joe-Biden-and-the-Oval-Office-MILITARY-STATE-BIOLOGICAL-TERRORISTS-NUMBER-1-09-06
https://telegra.ph/Preparation-for-the-International-Tribunal-07-13
