What is the safest distance from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
https://telegra.ph/What-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5G-cell-System-04-07 are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although safe distance from cell tower 're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.
Check out this site (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.