What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because safe distance from cell tower transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In safe distance to live from cell phone tower there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.