The end of virology is only a single control experiment awaytranslated by Corona Investigative
What do a science fraudster, a scientist who is the victim of a misconception and a scientist who has uncovered the misconception have in common? Actually not much, but in this story they are instrumental in ending the corona delusion with immediate effect and not only that, they have the power to send the complete virology into the realm of the damned. It would introduce the long and overdue paradigm shift in medicine. Why is this so important? I will tell you! It would not only end every pandemic, no, it would never be possible to claim one again, there would be no more vaccinations, it would take away people's fear and most importantly, it would pave the way for a real medicine, universal biology. Which three scientists am I talking about? This story is about the science fraud Prof. Christian Drosten, the honest scientist Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, who himself, like many others, is a victim of a misguided development in medicine, and a scientist who is not mentioned by many, is deliberately avoided by many, even though he has set one of the most important milestones for mankind. This is Dr. Stefan Lanka, the winner of the measles trial. (1) My intention with this article is not to discredit anyone or to diminish his work, with the exception of Prof. Drosten, who would have to be stripped of his title with immediate effect. Prof. Drosten is in my eyes a felon who has been reported several times for good reason. Among others by Dr. Stefan Lanka. (2)
The reason why the backers' plan works again every 2 years is that even those who provide education, be it the scientists Bhakdi, Mölling, Kämmerer or Wodarg and Co. (Group of physicians and scientists who have opposed the Corona policy and measures in the German-speaking world, but whose outdated world view assumes the existence of disease-causing viruses) still talk about existing viruses that do not exist. (3) If you ask them about the scientific evidence of a disease-causing virus, where work was done according to the scientific set of rules, (4) which includes the necessary control experiments, either nothing at all or publications that do not meet the scientific criteria are produced. And this is exactly where we have a problem.
What good is it if we can convince people with a number of statistics of deaths and statistics where the number of PCR tests are set against the number of people who tested positive? What is the point if we can show that the claimed virus is completely harmless - and substantiate this fact with several studies worldwide? It does not help much, because it is only a time shift to next year, when these backers will simply claim a new virus, just as they do and have done over and over again. From BSE to bird flu, swine flu, Ebola, Zika and now SARS-CoV-2, who has the strength to refute these fairy tales every year? We will not survive so many lockdowns!
All this is just banter, it leads to nothing. What do we do if we are not lucky enough to be afflicted by a mild winter, as was the case this year, but by a severe winter, in which there are basically more deaths and real illnesses? Who will still believe us then with statistics? They won't help us then, more people will actually die than the year before. All these efforts would not be necessary if all the scientists and doctors, who have already actively worked through the myth of a dangerous corona virus, would join forces and carry out these control experiments together with Dr. Stefan Lanka. Contrary to all the hard-earned facts, the control experiments are a flyspeck and can be carried out very quickly. Real science can be so simple.
Why don't Bhakdi and Co. carry out the necessary control experiments that are demanded by Dr. Stefan Lanka, among others?
In order to avoid refuting themselves, these virologists consistently disregard two rules prescribed by science. One is to consistently verify all claims themselves. The other is to test all assumptions and methods used by means of control experiments. If they were to carry out the control experiments, they would find that ALL of the short gene sequences that they only mentally link to a virus genetic strand originate from the human metabolism and not from outside, from a claimed virus!
On 13.06.2020 Dr. Stefan Lanka (5) called on all biochemists, bioinformaticians, virologists and cell culture specialists to carry out and publish these control experiments and to inform him [Stefan Lanka] about them. He has designed a control experiment which excludes from the outset the excuse that the sample material used was contaminated with the SARS-Cov-2 virus before or during the control experiment.
Why have Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, (6) Prof. Karin Mölling, Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer, Dr. Wodarg, Prof. Drosten, RKI director Prof. Wieler and all the others not yet carried out these control experiments or contacted Dr. Lanka? At the RKI (7) the answer is clear to me, I have the proof through e-mail traffic that this institute does not care about facts. This would be reason enough to close this institution - an article about this correspondence will be published by me. However, I consider the first four mentioned scientists to be honest people.
Dr. Stefan Lanka was the first to explain in detail that Drosten's PCR test was not based on clinical data!
After Dr. Heiko Schöning read out some names [four in number] at the Anti Corona demonstration in Berlin on August 29, 2020, which confirmed that the PCR test of the Berlin Charité and Drosten was not based on clinical data, as no sequences were available yet, I lacked the name that would disclose the whole thing in detail to the experts. It was Dr. Stefan Lanka who showed in every detail that Prof. Drosten had committed science fraud and that the WHO was playing this game. Shouldn't credit go to those who have been working for over 30 years to ensure that the truth comes out? Dr. Stefan Lanka, had not only been able to demonstrate with sound facts during the measles virus trial (8) that there is no scientific proof for the measles virus, but also showed that scientific proof cannot be presented for any of the alleged disease-causing viruses. I asked the leaders of the resistance movement like the organizers of "Querdenken", "die Ärzte für Aufklärung (doctors for education)" as well as the participants of the two Corona Committees, who are doing a good job, to finally talk to Dr. Stefan Lanka. I have tried to mediate several times and I am always ready to do so. Everyone can contact me in this regard. I would like to mention again that Dr. Stefan Lanka has reported Prof. Christian Drosten to the police for exactly these and other reasons. Everybody should comply with this. Especially the other experts, who also confirmed Drosten's unscientific approach.
The required control experiments have already been carried out in the past and confirm the false assumption of the alleged disease-causing viruses.
Dr. Lanka has already had such control experiments carried out on the measles virus as an example and submitted them to the court. Long before Dr. Stefan Lanka, these necessary control experiments were also carried out and came to the same conclusion. A virus is not responsible for this.
I quote here from one of the laboratory analyses:
The expert opinion on the cytopathic effect refutes the claimed specific infectivity of the measles virus.
Cytopathic effect in monkey kidney cells is not specific for measles virus - Author: Laboratory manager of an independent laboratory in Germany
Result of the laboratory:
"Depending on the added non-viral and non-infectious substances, changes in cell morphology could be observed at different points in time, which since 1954 has been equated with the "isolation" of the "measles virus". Especially after the addition of high concentrations of penicillin/streptomycin (20%) or cultivation under deficient conditions (1% FCS), changes in cell morphology were observed that were microscopically identical to the formation of syncytia described by the measles virus (Table 1: Chemicals, solutions and cell culture media used). The investigations clearly showed that the formation of syncytia is not specific for a measles infection. Thus the forgotten observations of both Enders&Peebles and Bech&von Magnus were confirmed and the assumption that Enders&Peebles and successors had used this technique to prove the existence of a virus was refuted."
In the "mother" of all publications on the measles virus by John Franklin Enders and Peebles, they never claimed to have detected a measles virus, they had strong doubts, and this is so clearly written down in their publication. More about it in the article The Federal Court of Justice destroys the belief in Viruses. (9)
Also in the publication by Bech, V. & von Magnus, P. (1958) Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica 42(1):75-85 it is described that the cytopathic effect is not measles-specific, but is caused by other factors.
This is stated in the publication on p.80:
„cytopathic changes similar to those caused by measles virus may be observed also in uninoculated cultures of monkey kidney tissue (Fig. 4-5). These changes are probably caused by virus-like agents, so called ‚foamy agents‘, which seem to be frequently present in kidney cells from apparently healthy monkeys“
This sentence is remarkable, since it points to the unspecificity of exactly those pathological changes that served as the starting point for the optical evidence of an infection in the first publication by Enders & Peebles.
Prof. Karlheinz Lüdtke, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Zur Geschichte der frühen Virusforschung (Early History of Virology), reprint 125, 89 pages, 1999. i. K. (A 2) Preprint 1999. (10)
This reading is so important because it shows how important control experiments are in order to recognize that one was wrong. It shows that until 1953 it was clear and known to every virologist and the scientific community that all components that had been interpreted as components of viruses until then, turned out to be components of dead tissues and cells through control experiments. This is why it is so important to keep insisting on the lack of control experiments in the publications presented.
Further information and experimental setup can be found in the magazine Wissenschafftplus by Dr. Stefan Lanka. (11)
"The tissues and cells used for the "detection and multiplication" of the "viruses" are pre-treated in a very special way before the act of alleged "infection". They are deprived of 80% of their nutrients so that they become hungry and absorb the viruses. They are treated with antibiotics to rule out that bacteria, which are always and everywhere present in all tissues and sera, cause the expected death of the cells. It was not until 1972 that biochemists realized that the antibiotics used were independently damaging and killing cells without this being noticed and taken into account by virologists. It is exactly the factors "starvation" and "poisoning" that lead to the visible death of the cells, which was and is misinterpreted as presence, isolation, effect and reproduction of the only suspected viruses".
To which scientific publication or publications does the state government refer when it assumes the existence of the corona virus SARS-Cov-2 and derives the "corona" measures taken?
Justification: In all publications to which Prof. Christian Drosten refers when designing his PCR test, only the steps of how nucleic acids from patient fluids are arithmetically aligned to a viral genome strand are mentioned. This process is called alignment in Virology.
And the control experiments are missing, which exclude that it is not completely normal nucleic acids from patients from which the genome of the claimed virus is calculated.
The fact that the decisive control experiments are missing in all publications on the "isolation" of SARS-CoV-2 makes it impossible to consider these publications as scientific. Since the publication of the international scientific rules by the German Research Foundation DfG (12) in 1998, control experiments have been indispensable for calling a publication scientific.
One of the aims of my question is whether the corona measures taken by the government are legally justifiable at all, because the Infection Protection Act (IfSG), on which the measures are based, demands that all parties involved are scientifically aware of the current state of science and technology.
This is a question that all scientists and sincere educators should ask. The linchpin to stop this pandemic is to comply with the necessary scientific rules that were made mandatory by the DFG in 1998. This includes carrying out the necessary control experiments. All scientists who evade this must not be called scientists, they disregard the scientific rules and regulations which are obligatory for everyone!
What must we do together?
- Together we have to make sure that honest scientists jump over their shadows and get in contact with Dr. Stefan Lanka to conduct these control experiments and publish them together.
- Please help to pass on this information to the necessary people. All costs for the setup of the control experiments are taken care of, so this can't be an excuse.
- If the responsible persons refuse to carry out these control experiments, they will warn that they are acting against the scientific rules and thus contradict their own specifications. If they still remain silent, she asks you to name the publication in which the scientific rules were followed, including the control experiments that perfectly detect a virus. These can be sent to me.
- Make it clear to them that they will not lose face, but will emerge as honorable scientists.
- Explain to them that these control experiments are a small thing that have a huge effect.
At least let us do it for our children!
Translated, reblogged Version - Original here
Telegraph main page with overview of all articles: Link
Visit our Telegram Channel for additional news & information: Link
Chat with like-minded in our Telegram Chat Group: Link
Please support to keep this blog alive: paypal
(1) The Federal Court of Justice destroys the belief in Viruses
(2) Virologist Dr. Lanka press charges against Christian Drosten
(3) How dead are viruses actually?
(4) How to recognize "insufficient" publications and false virus images?
(5) Misinterpretation of virus - Part 2
(6) Wikipedia entry Sucharit Bhakdi
(7) Wikipedia entry RKI
(8) see 1
(9) Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):277–286.
(10) Zur Geschichte der frühen Virusforschung (Early History of Virology)
(11) Wissenschafftplus Magazin 2017 4. Ausgabe (Wissenschafftplus magazine 2017 4th issue)
(12) Wikipedia entry on DFG