The Consequences of Proving Election Fraud
Dave HayesI thought it might be helpful to look at a Q post from November 1st, 2017, and consider it in light of what we know today.
The post below discusses many subjects. I would encourage you to read the entire message, but I'd draw your attention to Q's mention of the NSA and James Comey about halfway down the post.
Note Q's hint that the NSA captured an audio or video recording of the Phoenix Tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch in late June of 2016.
Q implied that good people forced then-FBI Director Comey into a difficult position. He made a public statement on the bureau's investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails on July 5th, 2016, and cleared her of criminal wrongdoing. Then, near the end of October, just days before the election, according to Q, Comey was forced to acknowledge that some emails had not been examined and he re-opened the investigation. As a result, Hillary took a hit in the polls and Democrats suddenly turned against Comey. To this day, some blame him for her election defeat.
In a post the day before, Q wrote:
Was HRC next in line?
Was the election suppose to be rigged?
Did good people prevent the rigging?
We've been told by Mike Lindell and his team of cyber-experts that internet data packets were captured during and after the 2020 election showing election tampering. We might wonder if the same thing happened in 2016.
Would it not logically follow that the NSA and the Department of Homeland Security would routinely record election night internet data?
For how many years have they been capturing this data?
Why was this capability only made public when it affected the re-election of Donald Trump?
What are the implications of Q's statement: "There is simply no other way than to use the military. It’s that corrupt and dirty."
Are there patriots in the intelligence community and military who are devoted to defending liberty and upholding the rule of law?
If members of the intelligence community and military went to the trouble of allowing the public to see evidence proving that Joe Biden is not a legitimately elected president, do these same people have a plan to make things right?
Do they understand the consequences of letting the public know the presidential election was stolen, or did they make this decision without any consideration of the consequences?
Elections do have consequences, but exposing election fraud has even greater ones.
Links to Articles in this series
Q and the Media - The Anatomy of a Smear Campaign