Scarlett Johansson Nude Under The Skin

Scarlett Johansson Nude Under The Skin
By Justine Harman Published: Mar 31, 2014
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Scarlett Johansson's newest project is pretty out there—both literally and figuratively. In Under the Skin , out Friday, she plays a from-another-planet call girl on a mission. After we're acclimated to the genre via a narration of Mork & Mindy -style alien blurps from Johansson, we watch as she prepares for her envoy to earth. A dead lookalike lies clothed on a stark white floor. Johansson, fully naked, undresses the girl—removing lace stockings, a mini skirt, an uncomfortable looking starched denim jacket, and ankle booties—and then meticulously dresses herself in the ensemble.
And then we're off to Glasgow, Scotland, where Johansson cruises around the dreary city in a white van. Her orders are never fully spelled out, but it appears that she is tasked with seducing men—any kind, really: young, old, disfigured, disinterested—and luring them back to an abandoned shack, where she'll lead them into a tar pit before sucking the matter from their bodies. The skin gets discarded and the muscle gets transported back to the mother planet, where it's used as fuel. I think? It's pretty weird stuff. Johansson, however, is marvelous in the role. Whether she's flirting (in a lilting British accent, no less) with a prospect, or walking on the beach in stonewashed highrise jeans, her character is at once lushly warm and stiffly cold. Her body, which is on full display throughout the film, is as foreign to her as the clothes she's dressed it in. And it's a body I found myself examining, justifying, and categorizing throughout the entire 107-minute film.
Everyone knows Scarlett Johansson is curvy. A stylist once told me she has an E-cup bra size. And yet, I've seen her in person and she's practically diminutive—all slender calves and bird-like wrists. I've heard the same thing about Kim Kardashian : She looks voluptuous in pictures, but is "tiny" in person. Except in Under the Skin , Scarlett Johansson doesn't look tiny. Her breasts look full and her hips are round. When she's dressed up in borrowed clothes, I'm able to watch the plot unfurl, but the second she drops trou, all I can do is analyze her body. I crane my neck looking for evidence of Hollywood perfection amid the soft and familiar shapes, only to find it's not there.
And that's because this is no Hollywood flick. In the film's production notes, director Jonathan Glazer says that he "never wanted to cast [ Under the Skin ] with famous people." Glazer relented to casting Johansson because he says she "had a real appetite to do something risky," adding, "This is not the Scarlett Johansson as you might see her in a glossy magazine." (He also acknowledges the value of her star power to generate press and ticket sales: "I understand the need to cast somebody who means something in the marketplace–it's the law of the jungle, isn't it?")
As I mentioned before, our heroine's victims come in all shapes and sizes. And as they foolishly trot to their deaths, we are confronted with a cavalcade of specimens: the tightly muscled short guy, the skinny guy with loose skin and weird patches of body hair, the young beer enthusiast with rugby-size legs. And yet, I don't feel compelled to judge them. I don't care that I'm not attracted to them. In a way, I accept them for being real people (which many of them are). But I can't seem to do the same for Scarlett.
Maybe it's because I have put so much currency in the celebrity machine. When I see that someone whose radiant skin I have admired from afar has an uneven complexion in real life, I feel cheated. Similarly, when a celebrity, whose standard of beauty I have been spoon-fed since I was a teenager, looks even the slightest bit different from the version I'm used to seeing, I get rattled. As Anthony Lane puts it in his recent profile of the actress in The New Yorker : "Her character [in Under the Skin ] regards humans much as we regard movie stars—as unreachable creatures, whose rituals we yearn to uncover and mimic."
If Scarlett Johansson isn't, all of a sudden, the "Sexiest Woman Alive," what does that mean for me? For my non-Hollywood, regular person body?
When she's on the red carpet, Scarlett Johansson perfectly fits the celebrity paragon: She has insanely sculpted cheekbones, a tiny waist, and somehow, despite alleged size-E breasts, can wear designer samples. Being born a genetic lottery jackpot winner gives her, and other celebrities, a certain kind of power. Our habit of gazing at step-and-repeat images only reconfirms what we already know: We'll never look as good as her; her beauty is worth celebrating because it eclipses our own.
Except when it doesn't. After Under the Skin , I will never look at Scarlett Johansson the same way. Not because she plays a homicidal E.T. but because, for 107 minutes, Glazer presents us with an imperfect, flawed, and, well, alien version of the star. And as a cog in the celebrity fan machine, I've been conditioned to catalog these changes. Recent photos of Johansson (who is newly pregnant) have spurred moderate online outrage. "Love Scarlett but this is not a picture of pregnancy," one commenter writes on People.com , while another says, "Please...the girl is 15 minutes pregnant. Let us know when she's so swole her feet can't fit in shoes LOL." Clearly I'm not the only one who demands verisimilitude from her celebrities. If she's pregnant, look pregnant. If she's perfect, look perfect.
But a project like this wouldn't work with a Photoshopped and Spanxed Johansson. To be believable, it requires real-woman dimensionality. Her character's strength lies not in sinewy arms and six-pack abs, but in her ability to disarm victims via a warm smile, eye contact, and open-ended questions. Even without human context—this is her first time on earth, after all—she knows what we're all seeking: acceptance. The character has to appear "real." It's a bold and daring choice for someone whose legacy is tied up with the Hollywood ideal—an ideal that, for Johansson, is particularly Marilyn Monroe-esque. By taking this role, she is placing the artistic value of the film over having a "flawless" and unattainable body.
When the schism between stars and us gets smaller, idol worship gets compromised. And maybe that's a good thing. If stars are really just like us, does that mean we have to worship ourselves for a change? That concept makes me feel pretty damn naked.
A Timeline of Taylor Swift and Joe Alwyn’s Romance
Demi Moore Glows in Bikini During Greece Holiday
Taylor and Joe Seen Out With Lena Dunham
See J.Lo & Ben Shop and Kiss on Italian Honeymoon
Harry Styles & Olivia Wilde’s Romance Timeline
Blake Shares Thirst Trap Bikini Photo and Tags Rya
Olivia Wilde on That CinemaCon Incident
Kim Is Dating Again After Pete Davidson Split
Ben Was Seen Looking at J.Lo Wedding Pics on Vacay
Inside the Making of J.Lo's Wedding Dresses
J.Lo Shares First Up-Close Pics of Wedding Dresses
What Meghan and Serena Revealed on Podcast
Every item on this page was chosen by an ELLE editor. We may earn commission on some of the items you choose to buy.
©Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Published March 20, 2022 By Fapsmith
Do you want to see Scarlett Johansson naked? Of course you do. Even if you’re a gay man or a straight woman, I know you want to see Black Widow nude. Everyone does. It’s one of the universal constants. The frustration for every human with a pulse, however, is that there is only one movie in existence in which we get a proper Scarlett Johansson nude scene. The good news is that said movie offers less one nude scene and about six million nude scenes. Truly nothing is impossible. I’m talking of course about Under The Skin , the 2013 film by Jonathan Glazer (extremely loosely) based on the 2000 novel of the same name by Michel Faber. Tragically, in the film adaptation, Scarlett doesn’t play a wolfgirl like she does in the books, so all you anime fans are going to be disappointed. That said, catgirl nudity is still on the menu if you look hard enough.
Now, you may think that the reason she’s been so shy about getting naked since Under The Skin came out is because you’re not supposed to see a Disney actress nude. It messes with Disney’s family-friendly image, which is a weird concept considering even Disney stars from literal children’s shows end up doing reams upon reams of nudity after the fact, Miley Cyrus being perhaps the most notable example, but by no means the only. Even so, that’s not the reason. Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow has been a thing since Iron Man 2 came out all the way back in the glory years of 2010. But wait! Disney didn’t originally own Marvel Studios, so that’s irrelevant. Wrong in this situation. Disney bought out Marvel Entertainment in 2009, a year before the release of Iron Man 2 and the introduction of Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow. But when did Under The Skin come out?
The first time the world was blessed by seeing Scarlett Johansson nude was in 2014, when Under The Skin was released. Before someone calls me out on it, yes, technically the film first screened to audiences in 2013, but that was only if you happened to be at one of the major film festivals in which that happened. Everyone else had to wait until the following year. I do too remember waiting with bated breath for footage to finally emerge all those months, being sustained only by reports from lucky fappers that happened to be at one of the original screenings. It was a long wait, and then, to be honest, I was disappointed with the final release.
Scarlett Johansson, tits, trimmed bush, plenty of full frontal nudity – what could I possibly have been disappointed in? Well, for those who have seen the film, you’ve certainly noticed just how incredibly dark the nude scenes in it are. So if you’re sitting through it to fap to Scarlett Johansson naked, you might feel somewhat cheated. My problem back then was that I didn’t bother with color correction, and in fact, very few people did. Certainly the first offerings of the nude scenes from Under The Skin were only brightened or had the midtones boosted. Nothing more advanced than that, and sadly, it was not enough.
To get the full experience of enjoying Scarlett Johansson topless in Under The Skin, quite a lot of work has to go into it. Yes, it’s true that better attempts at color correcting these scenes have come about in the eight years since the movie met the general public, but I’ve still felt that none have really reached the kind of detail I need to minimally sustain my fap sessions. An oft-misattributed quote to Gandhi is “Be the change you want to see,” and while he didn’t actually say those words, if he had lived to witness the era of film and television nudity, I’m sure he would have. Gandhi liked titties. And I like detailed titties. This culminated in my own attempt at color correcting the nude scenes in Under The Skin so that I can actually get the best look at Scarlett Johansson naked possible (unless you’re Ryan Reynolds and you’ve gotten to see that heavenly body up close). The result (so far) is available all throughout this page. You’re welcome.
And Under The Skin really is the full package. If you’re after some Scarlett Johansson ass, it’s got you covered. If what would tickle you pink is close ups of Scarlett Johansson’s feet, then it’s got plenty of that too. Honestly, it’s unreal just how gratuitous the nudity in this movie is. And once you get some color correction done, it’s even visible. I don’t know if this has ever been confirmed or not, but I suspect that the really dark shots and extreme lighting are a payoff for how technically explicit the nude scenes are. I mean, you’re not going to get an A-list Hollywood actress who, as we’ve established, is already part of Disney’s Marvel Cinematic Universe as Black Widow, to do gaping pussy shots on screen unless you assure her that it’s totally artistic… not at all gratuitous… not at all meant to be sexually arousing.
That said, if you don’t find a close up of Scarlett Johansson’s pussy, surrounded by her neatly trimmed pubic hair, soft yet firm abs, and luscious thighs, sexually stimulating, then you’re truly one in a million. Again, gay men and straight women are not exempt from this. I’m not going to do a full run down of each of her nude scenes in Under The Skin, except to say that she doesn’t have any sex scenes, which is ironic considering the movie is all about luring unsuspecting Scottish neds into her van with the implication of them getting sex somewhere along the way. Then again, I suppose that was meant to be the subversion. Whatever. Either way, the naked scenes by and large involve non-sexual nudity, which I’ve always found makes for a more sublime fapping experience.
Let’s quickly address other films and characters where you might hope to see a naked Scarlett Johansson. Black Widow? The character everyone loves, for sure, but Disney actresses only go nude outside of their contracts, so that’s an obvious no-go. One of her early roles was in A Love Song for Bobby Long , wherein at the tender age of 19, she was cradling some majestic sideboob to flash for the camera. As you’ve probably guessed, there is no nipple visible, even if we do get a massive look at her massive right breast. Vicky Cristina Barcelona has some great cleavage as she’s topless in a bed, and while her tits look phenomenal, again, no nipples appear. Next, a skinny dipping scene in He’s Just Not That Into You . Tons of people swear they saw a flash of nip here as she bobs up and down in the swimming pool, but I’ve not scrubbed through the frames myself to confirm. She has a sex scene in Don Jon , but you pretty much see nothing, so that one’s a wash too.
Outside of film, the Scarlett Johansson leaked nude photos were what they were, but a lot of people felt it immoral to fap to those personal pictures. As for the ones that didn’t find it immoral, the Fappening showed us all something very interesting, which is that Hollywood millionaires just cannot afford phones with even halfway decent cameras. One last dishonorable mention goes to her role in Ghost in the Shell , in which all of her nudity is obscured by a body suit, even when she is literally meant to be completely naked. Yes, I am enough of a weeb to know that Major was always a machine (in that body anyway), but the Major in the anime had nipples, android or not, and Scarlett Johansson has nipples too, which has been proven to us courtesy of Under The Skin. I’m just saying it would have fit together nicely, but Hollywood decided to aim this adaptation at preteens, so we’re robbed once again.
Anywho, for all that’s wrong with the world of celebrity nudity, one thing that went right, albeit with a spot or ten of color correction, is Under The Skin. So from that gem of Scottish cinema, enjoy Scarlett Johansson nude.
Your email address will not be published.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Jessica Biel Naked – Powder Blue – Blu ray
Barbi Benton Naked – Hospital Massacre – 4K Blu ray

Movies

Music

Famous Relationships

Business

World

News

Crime

odd

Human Interest

Basketball

Football

Baseball

Fashion

Shopping

Family

Religion

Entertainment

Movies

Music

Famous Relationships

Celebrities

tv

News & Politics

Business

World

News

Crime

odd

Human Interest

US Politics

animals

Sports

Basketball

Football

Baseball

wrestling

mma

soccer

hockey

Health & Lifestyle

Fashion

Shopping

Family

Religion

BuzzWorthy

Health

LGBTQ

Food & Dining

travel

Science & Tech

Gaming

Gadgets

technology

science

Ams Vipergirls
Big Black Ass Getting Fucked
Niffty Stories

Scarlett Johansson Nude Under The Skin

Report Page