Правила рецензирования научных статей
Правила рецензирования научных статейСкачать файл - Правила рецензирования научных статей
Procedure of reviewing scientific articles Research papers, received by editorial board, answering the subjects of the journal, prepared in accordance with the requirements, undergo a peer-reviewing procedure. In case of rejection of sending a manuscript to revision, author receives a reasoned reply. We examine only previously unpublished manuscripts. This does not exclude the usual procedure of reviewing. Chief editor determines, whether an article answers the subject of the journal and meets the requirements, and forward it to reviewing to examination with PhD or ScD degree, who is a recognized expert on the subject of peer-reviewed material. Reviewers are notified, that tall manuscript are the property of authors and contain information, that should not be disclosed. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of articles. Breach of confidentiality is possible only when there is a statement for invalidity or falsification of materials. Manuscript is passed to a reviewer without any information about the authors. Time constraints for the procedure of reviewing is defined by the chief editor, individually for each case. The following items are pointed out in the review: If the review contains recommendations for editing and or finalizing an article, it is sent to an author with a proposal to take into account the recommendations in preparing a new version of an article or arguments to refute them. An improved paper is sending back for reviewing. In a case, where the reviewer does not recommend an article to publication, editorial board may send back an article to be rewritten, taking into account the comments made on it, as well as send it to another reviewer. Text of a negative review is also sent to an author. Manuscripts, which receives contradictory reviews, should be forwarded to an additional reviewing. If a manuscript receives two negative reviews, publisher has a right to reject the submitted manuscript immediately and not to publish it. The final decision on publication of an article is taken by the chief editor together with the scientific editor. When a positive decision on publishing an article is taken, the author is informed. Text of a review is sent to an author via Internet. Originals of the reviews are stored at the editorial office for three years. The editors do not undertake any obligation on time constraints of publishing the manuscript. Not prescribed to an obligatory reviewing:
Вы точно человек?
Приказ президента республики узбекистан
Правила направления, рецензирования и опубликования статей
Виды предпринимательской деятельности в беларуси
Значение имени михаили отчество
Северная корея и сша последние новости
Лепим из соленого теста животных
Порядок рецензирования статей
Психологическая характеристика деятельности реферат