Okcupid Nudes
🛑 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Okcupid Nudes
© 2022 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here
Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.
New!
Follow this author to improve your content experience.
Got it!
CORRECTION: Edited to reflect Emil Kirkegaard's status as an Aarhus student, rather than researcher as previously stated.
The (very) personal data of 70,000 members of the dating site OKCupid has been released - not by hackers, but by university researchers.
The information includes everything from sexual turn-ons to drug use. And while it doesn't identify individuals by name, it does include usernames - which may well be enough to make it possible to work out users' real identities.
Emil Kirkegaard, a student at Denmark's Aarhus University, collected the data by scraping the site - arguably, perfectly legitimately.
Logged-in members of OKCupid can see a certain amount of information on other site users, and it would in theory be possible to trawl through the lot to put together the dataset.
And this is how Kirkegaard justifies posting the data on the Open Science Framework , writing in the paper that "all the data found in this dataset are or were already publicly available, so releasing this dataset merely presents it in a more useful form".
The data, which was collected between November 2014 and March 2015, isn't anonymised, and is extraordinarily personal. It includes the answers to the 2,600 most popular questions on the dating site, with information from people's opinions on astrology to whether or not they like being tied up during sex.
The researchers even say that the only reason they haven't published users' photos is that it would have taken up too much hard drive space.
However, anybody that's reused a username from one site to another, or used a name that makes them identifiable to their nearest and dearest, may now be extremely exposed.
"With these details, I roughly estimate I could ~90% accurately connect sexual preferences & histories to real names of >10,000 OkC users," tweets Carnegie Mellon digital humanities specialist Scott B. Weingart - later revising this figure up to 20,000.
Aarhus University is deeply embarassed by the researchers' actions. "The views and actions by student Emil Kirkegaard is not on behalf of AU," it tweets .
According to many, the release drives a coach and horses through any idea of research ethics or data protection. American Psychological Association rules state, for example, that study participants in studies have the right to know how their data will be used, and have the right to withdraw their data from that research.
Given that the research paper accompanying the release examines whether gay members of OKCupid tend to have the same basic responses as members of the opposite sex, consent certainly can't be assumed. In addition, for those many members of the dataset who have left the site since the information was gathered, lack of consent seems pretty likely.
The dataset also appears to be a violation of the European Data Protection Directive.
Scientists and others are currently flocking to sign an open letter to the university ethics committee calling for a formal repudiation of the release - a tweet is not enough, they say.
They point out that the data can only questionably be described as public, as accessing it required logging into the site. And, they say, "Kirkegaard’s dataset needlessly exposes marginalised people to stalking, harassment and violence by individuals, communities and nation states."
"This is a clear violation of our terms of service – and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act – and we’re exploring legal options," says an OKCupid spokesman.
However, mathematician Paul-Olivier Dehaye, an OKCupid member, says he will today write to the company accusing it of a failure to keep his personal data safe and seeking arbitration.
"OKCupid has a history of encouraging reckless and unethical data mining, and this is also an opportunity to see if they defend double standards," he says.
Meanwhile, though, the data is out there, and has already been accessed hundreds of times. One researcher, software engineer Max Woolf, has already used it to produce an analysis of dating age range preferences - before discovering how the data was collected and removing his post .
When I spoke to Kiekegaard earlier today, he was reluctant to talk in detail about the controversy, but pointed to the many research projects using
Twitter
data as a parallel.
And it's certainly true that the terms and conditions of the OKCupid site state that 'all information submitted on the Website might potentially be publicly accessible'.
Nevertheless, this release clearly isn't something that users of the site would have expected. It's an excellent example of how in the new age of big data and analytics tools, privacy rules can sometimes fail to keep up.
Says Dehaye, "Kirkegaard is abusing emerging and existing practices of science and the lag in legal and ethical supervision to intentionally achieve an outcome that discriminatorily affects the weak."
UPDATE (Saturday): The name of someone wrongly cited in Mr Kirkegaard's paper as an author has been removed at his request.
February 27, 2014
Christian McQueen
February 27, 2014
Cynical Libertarian Society
February 28, 2014
Conrad Stonebanks
February 28, 2014
Days of Broken Arrows
February 28, 2014
Conrad Stonebanks
February 28, 2014
Michael of Charlotte
February 27, 2014
Brandon C Francis
February 27, 2014
"Furious" George Rockwell
February 16, 2016
Jonathan David Finch
Copyright 2012-2018 Return Of Kings - Privacy - Terms Of Service
B.R. Crumb is a web developer in New York. He's on Twitter .
Let me be the first to thank you for your participation in what has been history’s largest, and most unflinchingly honest, female beauty pageant. Though you didn’t realize it, by creating your online dating profile, you put yourself in the running for the coveted title of, “ OkCupid’s Most Attractive (read: bangable) Girl .”
OkCupid didn’t tell you about this because they never intended to release the results—but I got my hands on the list of winners, so I’m going to do it for them, starting with the hottest girls of OkCupid Los Angeles.
Before the results, a note on procedure. This ranking is based solely on data pulled directly from OkCupid. It represents the collective wisdom of thousands of men judging thousands of girls in the Los Angeles area. Whenever a man visits a girl’s profile (or vice versa) or views in it OkCupid’s ‘Quickmatch’ game, he can rate her on a 1–5 scale; see below.
Girls: while your account was active, hundreds if not thousands of men rated you based on your looks and written responses. OkCupid kept meticulous track of their judgements.
All the many ratings your profile received were averaged so that—in the proud tradition of oppressor males everywhere—the guys who built OkCupid could reduce your attractiveness to a single number on the 1-10 scale. They used that number to rank you against other girls in your area.
Gaggles of chicks flocked to OkCupid and, over time, the cream rose. In this no-holds barred competition of female value, there were winners, and there were a helluva lot of losers.
The girls here are the winners . They had the 25 highest ratings in Los Angeles when I pulled the numbers, and they provide an illuminating look at what men find attractive, when asked in the privacy of their own dating profiles.
To be eligible to win, a girl had to:
I tossed all such girls into the mix, and here’s what came out. For each of the 25 winners below, there’s one profile picture and a representative quote from her profile text. I’m keeping the screen names to myself, because I’m a selfish bastard. Plus, privacy concerns or some shit.
If you were among the losers , take note:tThere’s much to be learned through observing your betters. For your benefit, I’ve included a quiz at the end to gauge your comprehension of the material presented below.
There is a lesson behind all these pictures. Take this quiz to see how well you’ve internalized it:
1. Recall that girls ages 18 to 49 were eligible to win. Expressed as a percentage, how many of the winners were 22 or younger? 25 or older?
2. By the standards of 2014 America, how many of the winners qualify as “thin” or “skinny”? How many are “curvy,” “full-figured,” “overweight,” or have “a little extra”?
3. How many of these winners have pixie cuts ?
5. How many have gaps between their thighs ? How many have holes in their Lululemons ?
6. How many appear to have distinguished themselves based on their intellect, eloquence, experience, confidence, professional success, maturity, political / social awareness, grrrl power, or other qualities not visible to the naked eye?
7. Speaking of naked, how many of these girls appear uncomfortable showing skin or presenting themselves as sex objects for the gratification of men?
EXTRA CREDIT : Briefly, if the offense is not too great, consider girl #23. In order from most important to least important, rank the following factors that might have contributed to her high score:
If you struggled on the quiz, check this list of L.A.’s 20 runners up for remedial instruction in what men actually value in girls. Others of you can go here to learn more about how this ranking was compiled.
Stop getting tricked by bad girls who are pretending to be good
Our most important article of the year gives you 30 signs that a girl has been with over 100 men. Get instant access by signing up to our informative weekly newsletter below...
man, I want to put these girls in my harem, then pass them around my bros, and then pimp them out for cash
The best part is I banged one of the girls on this list. (No I’m not saying who, but she’s one of the hotter brunettes)
Didn’t meet her on OkStupid though, met at the club.
“Didn’t meet her on OkStupid though, met at the club.”
Haha. I think being on OkCupid automatically put you on the ‘do not bang list’ for these girls.
OkCupid strikes at the very heart of Game in that it significantly lowers your pre-selection. Sloot logic dictates that the guy shouldn’t be actively looking because he already should be attractive to many sloots. It should just happen, you shouldn’t be actively looking. Oh Sloots, you never fail to amaze.
So true. I would bet my life savings that no one who actually “rated” these girls actually had sex with any of them
my bet’s on the coy looking bitch with the iphone… no#3 tie – 23… she’s about the only one worth a mention, unless you like the child molester skinny blondies…
I hope you realize what you consider “child molester skinny” there in America is what we consider “average” everywhere else here on Earth…
not really man. That chick’s like….unhealthy. I’d only bang 6 of them though because ass is the deal maker/breaker for me, but then again, I’m black, so maybe you’re different. That ginger’s disgusting, BTW. I’d rather just jerk off than accept any sexual advances from that! Oh, and I counted 6 girls with ass, which is what I call curvy, not that fat disgusting BBW shit feminist s talk about. However, I think chicks get confused easily, so I’m seriously not sure what word to use. People think we like fat chicks. We don’t. Sir Mix a lot wanted 36-24-36 at 5’3″, not 40-40-40, you know? Big ass, tiny waist, nice tits- best thing you can ever get man.
Commodores had the same requirements with Brick House. Lol
it’s one thing bedding a girl young enough to be your daughter, and another altogether when she looks like she’s yet to start high school… no#1 surf chick looks about 15… so do some of the others…. not really my thing…. and probably terrible in bed.
Quote: ” hope you realize what you consider “child molester skinny” there in America is what we consider “average” everywhere else here on Earth”
Agreed. Slender physiques are normal in societies whose female population are not bloated sacks of pig vomit.
I wouldn’t do some of these girls with your dick.
I’m sure you aren’t the only guy that banged her from that club. I’m sure she gets around like a record player.lol
And number 23 is proof of American men’s obsession of huge tits being able to overcome a multitude of sins.
Shaking my head America. Same damn people that made Kate Upton a supermodel.
this article nearly made me puke on my laptop……. shopping carts 1 and all…. will that be paper or plastic sir ?
Plastic, the ride may be fun but dangers…
just make sure you use some rubber…..
OkCupid is the Wal-Mart of the dating world.
We’ve learned to live with the shame…
An American man that doesn’t fuck trashy overweight gingers that look like their crowning achievement in life was waiting tables at Waffle House.
I thought the list was like ‘who puts out easiest + comes across as dumb’ versus ‘girls who come across as the nice/sweet/innocent girl’.
Big tits + mentioning you’re c0ck hungry = winner, in her case.
But yeah, I would not bang unless forced to.
The simplest difference between Men and girls on okCupid in one picture man. That’s all umm sayin
Thank you. The Kate Upton hype is simply beyond me.
She has a good rack, and no ass. She comes from money, so she has the contacts to ensure such hype.
No one expects a chimp to understand why she is the prototypical female.
Did an google image search on her. She is a escort $160 an hour.
Maybe it’s just me, but I wouldn’t bang most of these girls. Are these women really hot and I’m missing something?
I think you have 2/10 WNB syndrome.
He’s right tho mostly 7s, and crude 7s at that.
Guys preferences can be different yo. I personally care about the big ass and small waist so much that I can’t get hard without it, and will overlook a girl’s busted face if she has it. Fuck, I say bags aren’t just for carrying shit. So I’d only bang six of these girls, but I’d fuck them with the force of all the Broncos man! I especially like number 1 and number 2, and the last 9 might make me premature ejaculate. Just saying. but that ginger….who the fuck would touch that? Would you? if you were on a dry spell? If she coerced you with her titties? If all of the above were true and you just drank half a handle? If all the above were true and she’s trying to rape you? For the record, I’d run, and if I can’t, I’d beat a hoe, just so I can leave. She might like it or try to arrest me, but all that be damned, I’m protecting myself from AIDS.
I agree: except for a few hotties (#3), most of them are barely doable.
But I am in Europe, so my standards are different, I guess (poor American men, if these overweight degenerates are what you consider “attractive”, I can’t even imagine what the rest of them look like..)
No. The problem is the presentation. If you saw them in person you’d probably like them but seeing them in these pictures one after the other they come off as obnoxious — like they’re trying to shove contrived sexuality down your throat. This is why the Web distorts our images of the opposite sex. It’s as if you asked for a bit of whipped cream on your sundae and someone doused it with a gallon — it’s no longer tasty even though it’s the same stuff.
You wouldn’t bang these girls? Sorry don’t buy it.
I actually don’t…find…these girls hot at all.
physically most are relatively attractive, not exactly model material but OK……
sexually they all appear happy to put out for the right masculine guy
but intellectually, i think i’d have a brain embolism spending 5 minutes talking to them…
this is where my recent hooker mentality comes into play….
no BS. quality of service, relaxing, no gossip, privacy, and no i don’t want to hear about your BFF, ex-boyfriend, momma’s new boyfriend, dreams of being an actress, court room lawyer, rocket scientist, etc. or listen to you giggle over your iphone and facebook page… it’s makes my brain feel like someone injected jelly into my ears….
the time and effort and not inconsiderable costs that will go into wooing any or all of these girls, doesn’t stack up, especially since most of them are probably terrible in the bedroom and are waiting with clipboard in hand to judge your performance – and tell all their friends about it.
it’s demeaning for a real man to have to stoop to the level of these women just to get laid…. you’re only fooling yourself…. it’s like working a shift at macdonalds just to get a free hamburger. I’d rather eat out of the dumpster than put on a uniform and prepare french fries for drive through customers.
Many hot women are bad in bed because they don’t need to put any effort. They get your dick for validation, while thinking of high heels, sushi and Jared Leto. The second you complain they can get another man.
Actually, many 5-6s are better in bed than 7-9s, since they do actually have to keep an alpha happy in bed to ensure some degree of commitment (or at least a call).
As for the hookers, it is a financially sound expense with low time investment and no bull attached. However, the thrill of getting even a 6 in bed is worth it as a man becomes red pill aware. That is why I refrain from hookers, for now.
lol @ No.14 (The 24yr old blonde one) “lets just say my professor gave me an A+”. And that ladies and gentlemen, is everything that’s wrong with america in a nutshell.
What’s wrong are those fu….. high-placed white knights. For any girl that gets “affirmative actioned” by those dickheads, a decent, hardworking guy is sidelined.
I was a TA when I was in grad school and blue pill as hell. I look back on those days through the red pill filters and think of some of the girls I could have nailed and it just depresses me.
Following on McQueen’s comment, this article may generate an ROK “Eskimo Bros.” Follow-up.
The results, might not be that shocking….
14 – not real, it’s a chubby hipster brunette who found that picture in a catalog
14 – volleyball shorts…….enough said
9 – both the manipulative bitch blonde and the blonde humping the couch who probably smells like a combination of mothballs and cigarettes and is probably sticky from the sweat of her popping mollies the night before.
1 – is a cute as hell but she’s got 20 surfer dudes who wear hurley tshirts lined up
By the way, these girls are such cornballs with their cliches of shopping, partying, sushi, creep, phone, “I enjoy life.” I respect #2 the most because she just flat out said “I like sex does that make me a hoe?” Which means she is a hoe but I salute her.
“I have two bunnies . . .”
. . . and I’m saving up for a neck.
“I have never tried sushi.”
Good to know that you’re not like “I like some seafooooooood, mama” #25.
“You like beer.”
I’m a celiac, you insensitive clod. Do you steal pencils from blind men too?
I’ll be here all week (where the fuck is spring already. I ain’t in LA, I can tell you that. In fact, I just did).
Surfer girl is surfer fit. I like that enough that I could give a pass on the meh face if she didn’t feel obliged to make it all goofy and shit for the camera. Definite self-esteem issues there. Once upon a time, but I’m getting tired of dealing with that shit.
Number #21 (Russian) is just perfect
With that pose, she shows off a nice, fit body, and she’s dressed elegantly. To me, that’s so much more appealing than “Ooh, look at my tits!”
The second #7’s comments made me laugh out loud. “I’m 22 and a true unique person. I love to party and have a good time.” Self awareness; she knows it not.
This is the best fatshaming article on RoK
Most of them do not have particularly beautiful faces, but a few of them do. Number 14’s photo was obviously pinched from a magazine. I guarantee you she’s not on OK Cupid.
Somebody needs to assemble a contest where we go the other way, and pit the least desirable Ok Cupid members in
Anal Fisting Stories
Tgirls .Porn
Skewered Testicles