Limpio buy hash

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Limpio buy hash

Thank you for visiting nature. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Recent increases in marijuana use and legalization without adequate knowledge of the risks necessitate the characterization of the billions of nanoparticles contained in each puff of smoke. Tobacco smoke offers a benchmark given that it has been extensively studied. Tobacco and marijuana smoke particles are quantitatively similar in volatility, shape, density and number concentration, albeit with differences in size, total mass and chemical composition. For tobacco and marijuana smoke, respectively, and different compounds are detected, of which, and in common are tentatively identified, and of these, and different compounds 69 in common are known to cause negative health effects through carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or other toxic mechanisms. This study demonstrates striking similarities between marijuana and tobacco smoke in terms of their physical and chemical properties. Cannabis is among the most commonly used controlled substances worldwide 1 , 2. An estimated In North America, an estimated There is a growing trend to liberalize policies governing cannabis possession and use 3 with over 20 countries and most U. At the time of writing, eleven U. In , Canada became the first Group of 7 G7 country 6 and the second in the world, after Uruguay 7 in , to formally legalize cannabis for recreational use 8. Smoking marijuana is commonly perceived as less harmful than smoking tobacco 10 , However, marijuana smoke contains harmful substances including known carcinogens likely emitted from the pyrolysis of the plant material during smoking The health effects of tobacco smoke have been extensively studied and after decades of research it has been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen While smoking marijuana has been associated with increased rates of adverse respiratory symptoms and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 10 , 14 , it has not been conclusively linked to lung cancer The chemical composition of tobacco smoke has been thoroughly investigated in previous work However, there are few reports of the chemical composition of marijuana smoke. The chemicals emitted from smoking tobacco cigarettes or marijuana cigarettes known as joints are qualitatively similar with some quantitative differences 17 , 18 , Chemicals such as nitrogen oxides, hydrogen cyanide, and aromatic amines were found in marijuana smoke at concentrations three to five times higher than tobacco smoke The deposition of chemical constituents from an aerosol in human lungs e. Several studies characterize aerosols from smoking tobacco cigarettes 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ; however, there are very few studies which characterize aerosols from smoking marijuana joints. In , Hoffman et al. In the s, the group of Hiller et al. The chemical properties of mainstream and sidestream smoke from nonfiltered tobacco or marijuana cigarettes under two smoking conditions were extensively compared by Moir et al. However, aerosol research in this area appears to be limited. Therefore, significant research is required to generate the same level of understanding of marijuana smoke that has been developed of tobacco smoke over decades. In this work, aerosol particles produced from smoking tobacco cigarettes or marijuana joints are characterized in terms of particle number concentration, aerodynamic and mobility size distributions, mass, effective density, morphology, volatility, and chemical composition. These characteristics are then quantitatively compared with each other as well as against previous tobacco research to provide context for the marijuana smoke results, an area where knowledge is currently limited. This study compares the mainstream smoke produced from a filtered tobacco cigarette with that from a nonfiltered marijuana joint. The aerosol smoke samples were collected in a bag with dilution air to allow common particle characterization techniques to be utilized, while the chemical composition and total particulate matter TPM measurements were completed on smoke collected on quartz filters immediately downstream of the cigarette or joint. These two sampling methods, henceforth referred to as aged and fresh smoke, respectively, were identical between the measurements of the tobacco and marijuana smoke. Further experimental details are provided in the Methods section, with additional information on the cigarettes and sampling techniques presented in Supplementary Sections S1 and S2 , respectively. Smoke particles contain chemical compounds with a large range of volatilities. To investigate this aspect, this study used a catalytic stripper strategically with different experimental setups to characterize the nonvolatile portion of the smoke e. Semi-volatile compounds have a meaningful presence in both gas and particulate phases, and have lower vapor pressures than volatile compounds Nonstripped particles were not conditioned by a catalytic stripper. The aerodynamic and mobility size distributions of aged particles produced by smoking tobacco cigarettes or marijuana joints are qualitatively similar, as shown in Fig. All size distribution measurements confirm a lognormal frequency characteristic of aerosols having undergone coagulation by Brownian motion The lognormal size distributions are quantified by three parameters: count median diameter CMD , geometric standard deviation GSD and total number concentration N. Further detail is given in the Methods and Supplementary Sections S3. Geometric standard deviations of the averaged log-normal fits ranged between 1. For a , b , the center line and shaded regions represent each CMD and its corresponding total uncertainty, while for c , d the error bars represent the total uncertainties, with the exception of GSD error bars in c which represent its precision uncertainty. Adam et al. Similarly, Ingebrethsen et al. In either case i. This difference is reflected in the geometric standard deviations GSDs , ranging from 1. The total particle number concentrations N of the aged aerosol from either smoke source were quantified using three different methodologies as shown in Fig. These measurements varied due to the high concentration of particles in the smoke samples and their transient nature see Supplementary Section S3. Despite this variation and the measured sizes of the tobacco and marijuana smoke particles being different, the particle number concentrations from the two smoke sources are approximately the same with four of the six measurements agreeing within the measurement uncertainty as shown in Fig. The dilution-corrected particle number concentrations measured by the condensation particle counter CPC for both the aged tobacco and marijuana smoke are shown in Supplementary Fig. This decrease in particle concentration over time is also reflected in the consecutive mobility size distribution measurements see Supplementary Fig. S4 and, as discussed further in Supplementary Section S3 , is likely a combination of particle coagulation, evaporation, and losses within the smoke bag over time The measured effective densities of aged particles from tobacco and marijuana smoke are shown in Fig. Densities in this range are common for organics These results also agree within uncertainty with effective densites of aged particles from tobacco smoke determined independently by Johnson et al. This constant density indicates that the nonstripped, aged particles from either smoke source have a spherical morphology, which is likely achieved by the outer surface of each particle being liquid. This inference agrees with the chemical composition and particle size distribution results that indicate the presence of relatively volatile hydrocarbons, which likely exist as liquids. Using those parameters and their associated uncertainties, the mass concentrations of the particles were roughly 2. This estimate uses the Hatch-Choate equations to calculate the particle mobility diameter that represents the average mass of the measured mobility size distributions fitted with a log-normal function. These mass concentrations agree with total particulate matter TPM measurements of fresh smoke collected on a filter directly downstream of the cigarette or joint without dilution or aging due to sampling , which show smoking a marijuana joint produces roughly 3. These results indicate that the volatility of aged particles from either smoke source are similar and that the particles are almost entirely comprised of semi-volatile material. Particles with high mass volatility can also be produced from combustion engines 43 although this is typically accompanied by higher number-based semi-volatile fractions than are observed here. Furthermore, purely semi-volatile particles may manifest as another distinct peak in a particle size or mass distribution 44 , however, all size and mass distributions measured were uni-modal. Headspace solid-phase microextraction SPME was used to sample components of aerosols collected directly from mainstream tobacco and marijuana smoke on quartz filters for chemical analyses. The total number of compounds detected for these samples were and , respectively, which are approaching the over compounds that have been compiled for tobacco smoke using numerous methods Based on linear temperature-programmed retention indices of alkanes ranging from C5—C30 in the first dimension and mass spectral library searches against the NIST and Wiley mass spectral libraries, or compounds were tentatively identified in aerosols from tobacco cigarette or marijuana joint smoke, respectively. The identified compounds were further grouped into chemical classes Supplementary Table S1 to highlight major chemical differences between tobacco and marijuana smoke. The lists of compounds identified in tobacco or marijuana smoke particles along with the known health effects of each compound are also provided in Supplementary Tables S3 and S4. The x-axis denotes first-dimension retention time seconds , while the y-axis denotes second-dimension retention time seconds. Peak intensity is indicated based on the colour bar. The relative number of peaks among chemical groups for samples of tobacco and marijuana smoke are shown in Fig. Though the two types of smoke look similar according to Fig. Most notably, the hydrocarbon content of tobacco has greater contributions from aromatic and polycyclic aromatic compounds, whereas marijuana contains more terpenes and sesquiterpenes. Additionally, tobacco contains a greater variety of pyridines than marijuana, even though marijuana smoke itself contains about seven times more pyridine than tobacco cigarette smoke. A greater number of oxygenated species are observed in tobacco smoke, which may be due to differences in oxygenated species endogenous to the product, or could be due to compounds being produced in greater amounts during the tobacco cigarette combustion process itself. These peak areas were normalized to the peak area of dodecane. Health effects of the individual compounds that were tentatively identified are summarized in Table 2 , and detailed in Supplementary Tables S3 and S4. This list of compounds represents only those identified by the chemical analyses in this work, and should not be considered an exhaustive list of carcinogens, mutagens, teratogens or otherwise toxic compounds found in mainstream tobacco or marijuana smoke The data in Table 2 show some notable differences between the potential health effects of tobacco vs. A limitation of the chemical analyses and sampling of the collected aerosols from the filters is that very light compounds are not detectable by our approach. These two additional compounds are included in the health risk numbers above, as well as Table 2. In order to appear in our results, compounds must have a sufficiently low vapor pressure to condense into the particle phase and be trapped by filters during the smoking experiment. In general, compounds in the range of C6 hexane to C25 pentacosane are readily observed under the conditions of this experiment. A second limitation of the non-target approach taken here is that different compounds will have different partition coefficients with the SPME fibre, and MS response factors are not constant across all compounds. This means that comparisons between different compounds are impossible in all but the most general terms. However, comparisons in the relative amounts of a particular compound e. While relative concentrations of compounds in the two types of aerosol can be estimated based on careful study of Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 , an actual assessment of risk would also need to consider other factors such as the dose being received through smoking. As discussed in Supplementary Section S2 , marijuana smokers tend to inhale larger volumes of smoke and also hold the smoke in their lungs longer than tobacco smokers 17 , 20 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , which may lead to a different proportion of inhaled material entering the bloodstream. However, tobacco users typically smoke many more cigarettes per day than marijuana users smoke joints. In Canada, for example, the average smoker of tobacco will consume Therefore, the data presented here should be viewed as a guide to compounds and their metabolites that should be targeted in future health studies. The physical characteristics of aerosol particles produced by smoking tobacco cigarettes or marijuana joints are qualitatively similar with quantitative differences in size, mass and chemical composition. Diffusion is the primary deposition mechanism for particles smaller than 0. Therefore, the measured differences in particle size between marijuana and tobacco smoke could have limited, but potentially significant implications for locations of deposition of the chemicals they carry into human lungs. These effective particle densities are independent of mobility size, indicating that the particles from either smoke source are spherical. This morphology is likely due to the particles having a liquid component, which agrees with other volatility and chemical measurements that indicate the presence of light hydrocarbons. These similarities in morphology, effective density and number concentration, while accounting for the marijuana smoke particles being larger, results in a 2. This estimate agrees within uncertainty with total particulate matter TPM measurements of fresh smoke also collected, which shows smoking a marijuana joint produces roughly 3. This result agrees with chemical analyses of fresh tobacco and marijuana smoke collected on filters. The chemical analyses tentatively identified and compounds in marijuana and tobacco smoke particles, respectively, with approximately one-third being common to both smoke sources. Of those identified, and compounds found in marijuana and tobacco smoke 69 common to both , respectively, are known to pose health risks through carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic or other toxic mechanisms. While there are compounds in marijuana which may have some therapeutic effects, these have not been thoroughly and rigorously studied in this work. Consequently, this study focuses on compounds which present known health risks and could act as a guide to compounds and their metabolites that should be targeted in future health studies. While this study characterized and compared the mainstream smoke from marijuana joints and tobacco cigarettes most representative of that encountered by the general public i. Therefore, additional insights could be gained by future studies of the smoke from filtered marijuana joints, such as if any of the similarities or differences between the tobacco and marijuana smoke observed in this study are due to being filtered and nonfiltered, respectively. The aerosol properties of fresh smoke from marijuana relative to tobacco could also be compared using techniques which exhibit faster response times. These techniques are associated with higher uncertainties that must be carefully addressed, but will better capture the volatile and transient behaviour of the smoke particles. The decreased latency times would also be more representative of the aerosol that is inhaled by the smoker. These negligible losses of particles also agree with the insignificant diffusion and settling losses estimated by Johnson et al. Since these loss estimates are conservative, based on simplifying assumptions and negligible relative to the other uncertainties of the measurements as summarized in the Statistical Analysis section , these loss corrections were not applied to the results presented in this study. Please see Supplementary Section S3 for further details. Despite negligible particle losses of nonstripped tobacco smoke, Johnson et al. They showed that particle coagulation is likely the main mechanism for this trend, which should increase the CMD of smoke particles. However, consecutive mobility size distribution measurements collected by Johnson et al. This discrepancy was explained, based on mass conservation, by components of the particles likely evaporating over time. These results agree with the measurements of this study, which observed the decreasing particle concentration in the sample bag for all of the smoke samples as shown in Supplementary Fig. For example, the consecutive mobility scans of nonstripped tobacco smoke are shown in Supplementary Fig. Therefore, components of the particle evaporating over time likely affected the representativeness of the aged smoke samples of this study. However, particle evaporation has also been observed in fresh tobacco smoke 32 , 56 , and this observation is further supported by the many volatile and semi-volatile compounds identified in the fresh smoke of this study. In summary, the characterization of marijuana smoke presented comprises particle, chemical, and volatile species analyses, while using parallel tobacco smoke measurements and existing literature to provide context. Building on our work, researchers have a basis for which chemical compounds and particle properties to target in future toxicology or lung deposition studies of marijuana smoke to determine its associated health effects. The objective of this study was to characterize marijuana smoke and contrast it against its well-understood analog - tobacco smoke - under identical testing conditions. Tobacco cigarettes and marijuana joints were smoked using a dedicated smoking machine which allowed for programmable smoking routines, including the ability to vary the puff volume, profile and timing. For the online aerosol measurements, smoke was collected in sample bags which were pre-filled with dilution air and discarded after a single use. Material for offline measurements was collected using filters positioned immediately downstream of the tobacco cigarette or marijuana joint. The smoke samples were produced using a smoking machine Cambustion Ltd. These products represent the most common method of consumption of tobacco cigarettes and marijuana joints. In , Further details of these consumption methods are discussed in Supplementary Section S1. The mainstream smoke produced from one cigarette or joint was either captured directly into quartz filters for chemical analyses or TPM measurements, or collected into a smoke bag Kite Packing, Coventry, UK from which aerosol characterization was performed. These two sampling methods are referred to as aged and fresh smoke, respectively. These aged samples likely differ in some aspects due to particle coagulation, evaporation and losses in the smoke bag 30 from the aerosol inhaled during smoking. An aerosol is commonly characterized by its distribution of particle sizes and total particle number concentration. It is the diameter of a spherical particle with the same mobility or same aerodynamic drag under a known external force as the particle under consideration Further details regarding the aerosol size distribution measurements are outlined in Supplementary Section S3. The total particle number concentration was determined using three different methodologies, directly with a CPC or by integrating the area under the aerodynamic or mobility size distributions. Further details regarding these different approaches and the sources of variability for these measurements are outlined in Supplementary Section S3. This definition results in a constant effective density for homogeneous, spherical particle of any mobility diameter. Further details regarding the particle effective density measurements are outlined in Supplementary Section S3. This effective density, combined with the particle mobility diameter that represents the average mass of the measured mobility size distributions as estimated by the Hatch-Choate equations 44 , allowed the total mass concentration of the aerosol to be estimated. This estimate was compared against the total particulate matter TPM collected from fresh smoke on a filter directly downstream of the cigarette or joint i. The semi-volatile mass f m and volume f v fractions indicate the fraction of semi-volatile material relative to the total mass and volume, respectively. These semi-volatile fractions provide insights into the overall composition of the particles, as semi-volatile particles from combustion sources are likely comprised of organic hydrocarbons The semi-volatile fractions for the polydispersed size distributions were determined following a similar methodology, however using the mass and volume concentrations of the aerosols estimated using the Hatch-Choate equations 44 and measured mobility size distributions, rather than the individual particle mass and volume. Further details regarding the aerosol volatility measurements are outlined in Supplementary Section S3. Chemical compounds from particulates captured on pre-fired quartz filters were sampled by solid phase microextraction SPME for analyses. Chromatograms of both types of smoke samples extracted with different SPME fibre types are shown in Supplementary Fig. Peaks that did not meet the aforementioned criteria were treated as unknowns. All of the uncertainties stated or shown in this study are the total uncertainty based on propagating the repeatability of the measurements and biased uncertainty of the measurement methods through the analysis. World Health Organization. The health and social effects of nonmedical cannabis use. World Drug Report United Nations publication, Sales No. Pacula, R. Medical marijuana and marijuana legalization. Annual review of clinical psychology 13 —, State medical marijuana laws. Marijuana overview. Wesley, J. Beyond prohibition: The legalization of cannabis in Canada. Article Google Scholar. Romero, S. Uruguay acts to legalize marijuana. New York Times. Bill C45 - Statutes of Canada Health Canada. Tashkin, D. Is frequent marijuana smoking harmful to health? The Western Journal of Medicine , Sinclair, C. Perceptions of harm to health from cigarettes, blunts, and marijuana among young adult African American men. Maertens, R. The genotoxicity of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco smoke condensates. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 83, Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. Macleod, J. Cannabis, tobacco smoking, and lung function: a cross-sectional observational study in a general practice population. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Jett, J. Cannabis use, lung cancer, and related issues. Rodgman, A. The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke CRC press, 2 edn. Moir, D. A comparison of minstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions. Lee, M. Hoffmann, D. On the carcinogenicity of marijuana smoke. In Runeckles, V. Wu, T. Pulmonary hazards of smoking marijuana as compared with tobacco. Robinson, R. Coagulation of cigarette smoke particles. Nanoparticles in cigarette smoke; real-time undiluted measurements by a scanning mobility particle sizer. Ingebrethsen, B. Aerosol studies of cigarette smoke. Deposition of cigarette smoke particles in the human respiratory tract. Charles, F. Methodologies for the quantitative estimation of toxicant dose to cigarette smokers using physical, chemical and bioanalytical data. Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication ICRP 24 1—3 Johnson, T. Transient measurement of the effective particle density of cigarette smoke. Baker, R. The retention of tobacco smoke constituents in the human respiratory tract. Adam, T. Simultaneous on-line size and chemical analysis of gas phase and particulate phase of cigarette mainstream smoke. Steady-state measurement of the effective particle density of cigarette smoke. Hygroscopic effects on the mobility and mass of cigarette smoke particles. Chen, B. Physical characterization of cigarette smoke aerosol generated from a Walton smoke machine. Hiller, F. Anderson, P. Particle size distribution of mainstream tobacco and marijuana smoke. Sheehan, T. Chemical and physical variations of cannabis smoke from a variety of cannabis samples in New Zealand. Weschler, C. Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Swanson, J. Evaluation of thermal denuder and catalytic stripper methods for solid particle measurements. Friedlander, S. The self-preserving particle size distribution for coagulation by brownian motion. Electronic cigarette aerosol particle size distribution measurements. Vemury, S. Self-preserving size distributions of agglomerates. Dean, J. Lipowicz, P. Determination of cigarette smoke particle density from mass and mobility measurements in a Millikan cell. Graves, B. Characterization of particulate matter morphology and volatility from a compression-ignition natural-gas direct-injection engine. Hinds, W. The less harmful cigarette: a controversial issue. A tribute to Ernst L. Narkowicz, S. Environmental tobacco smoke: Exposure, health effects, and analysis. Rickert, W. A comparison of tar, carbon monoxide and pH levels in smoke from marihuana and tobacco cigarettes. Gargani, Y. Too many mouldy joints- marijuana and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Atakan, Z. Marijuana as medicine? The science beyond the controversy. Effects of varying marijuana smoking profile on deposition of tar and absorption of CO and deltaTHC. Government of Canada. Canadian cannabis survey summary. Ruzer, L. Aerosols handbook: measurement, dosimetry, and health effects CRC press, 2 edn. The changing cigarette, — Shin, H. Effect of cigarette filters on the chemical composition and in vitro biological activity of cigarette mainstream smoke. Kane, D. Effect of smoking parameters on the particle size distribution and predicted airway deposition of mainstream cigarette smoke. A report of the surgeon general. DeCarlo, P. Thirdhand smoke uptake to aerosol particles in the indoor environment. Reference Cigarette Program. Federal trade commission cigarette report for Kulkarni, P. Wang, S. Scanning electrical mobility spectrometer. Measuring aerosol size distributions with the aerodynamic aerosol classifier. Particle morphology and density characterization by combined mobility and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part 1: Theory. McMurry, P. The relationship between mass and mobility for atmospheric particles: A new technique for measuring particle density. Olfert, J. The effective density and fractal dimension of particles emitted from a light-duty diesel vehicle with a diesel oxidation catalyst. Kinney, P. Use of the electrostatic classification method to size 0. Agreement between different aerosol classifiers using spherical particles. In Cambridge Particle Meeting , June 15, Symonds, J. TSI Inc. Model ultrafine condensation particle counter: Operation and service manual, Revision B Download references. The authors thank Cambustion Ltd. Fiona Smail for her insight on chemical analysis techniques and her contributions to the literature search. Brian M. Graves, Tyler J. Johnson, Robert T. Robert T. Ryan P. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. The author contributions consisted of the following: B. Correspondence to Robert T. Nishida or Adam M. Reprints and permissions. Comprehensive characterization of mainstream marijuana and tobacco smoke. Sci Rep 10 , Download citation. Received : 18 November Accepted : 20 March Published : 28 April Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature. Download PDF. Subjects Mass spectrometry Nanoparticles. Abstract Recent increases in marijuana use and legalization without adequate knowledge of the risks necessitate the characterization of the billions of nanoparticles contained in each puff of smoke. Blood and urine multi-omics analysis of the impact of e-vaping, smoking, and cessation: from exposome to molecular responses Article Open access 21 February Assessment of the exposure to selected smoke constituents in adult smokers using in-market heated tobacco products: a randomized, controlled study Article Open access 28 October Introduction Cannabis is among the most commonly used controlled substances worldwide 1 , 2. Results This study compares the mainstream smoke produced from a filtered tobacco cigarette with that from a nonfiltered marijuana joint. Aerosol size distributions and concentrations The aerodynamic and mobility size distributions of aged particles produced by smoking tobacco cigarettes or marijuana joints are qualitatively similar, as shown in Fig. Figure 1. Full size image. Full size table. Figure 2. Figure 3. Table 2 Summary of known health effects for compounds found in smoke particles from tobacco cigarettes and marijuana joints. Numbers indicate the number of tentatively identified compounds which exhibit a given health effect. Discussion The physical characteristics of aerosol particles produced by smoking tobacco cigarettes or marijuana joints are qualitatively similar with quantitative differences in size, mass and chemical composition. Methods Experimental design The objective of this study was to characterize marijuana smoke and contrast it against its well-understood analog - tobacco smoke - under identical testing conditions. Smoke generation The smoke samples were produced using a smoking machine Cambustion Ltd. Aerosol size distributions and concentrations An aerosol is commonly characterized by its distribution of particle sizes and total particle number concentration. References World Health Organization. Article Google Scholar Romero, S. Acknowledgements The authors thank Cambustion Ltd. Author information Author notes These authors contributed equally: Brian M. Johnson and Robert T. Harynuk Authors Brian M. Graves View author publications. View author publications. Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary information. About this article. Cite this article Graves, B. Copy to clipboard. This article is cited by Modulation of pulmonary immune function by inhaled cannabis products and consequences for lung disease Matthew Preteroti Emily T. Wilson Carolyn J. Baglole Respiratory Research Publish with us For authors Language editing services Submit manuscript. Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author. Show results from All journals This journal. Advanced search. Close banner Close. Email address Sign up. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing.

About this item

Limpio buy hash

We offer easy, convenient returns with at least one free return option: no shipping charges. All returns must comply with our returns policy. Found a lower price? Let us know. Although we can't match every price reported, we'll use your feedback to ensure that our prices remain competitive. With over 10 years of demonstrated excellence in the development and production of growing tools, we have established ourselves as a trusted partner for every step in the growing process and for every level of grower. Vivosun's smart grow system enables growers to master the elements for optimal lighting and ventilation to achieve ideal grow results. We will help you manage your plants with scientific precision and control all aspects of your grow with high-quality technology and tools including durable growing enclosures;Whether you grow indoors or out, we provide everything you need to grow the highest quality plants in the shortest amount of time. Our mission is to empower growers at all levels and of all types to grow the best of what they love. Click to play video. Alika Seto. Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness. Customers like the quality, time-saving feature, and build quality of the garden shear scissors. They mention it works well, cuts their trim time down significantly, and makes harvesting a lot easier. Some are satisfied with the design. However, some customers have mixed opinions on the ease of use, size, and ease of cleaning. AI-generated from the text of customer reviews. Customers are satisfied with the product. They mention it works well, saves time, and is amazing. Some say it works better on wet buds than dry ones. Overall, most are happy with their purchase. I decided to try it and wow! It worked great! I got the 19 inch model. I think it cut down my trim time by two thirds To my surprise this thing works amazingly. The bowl trimmer saved hours of tedious cutting. I look forward to seeing how it is when used heavily. I used the rubber mat at the bottom to catch the trimmings This product took days worth of trim take mere hours Customers like the time saver. They mention it cuts their trim time down significantly and makes harvesting a lot easier. Some say it's worth the extra few dollars. I take all big leaves off the plant and put into machine right as I harvest High quality throughout, and high value. Hints:Don't overfill the trimmer Although frustrating at first, I now believe this trimmer was worth every penny. It literally saved me weeks and weeks of hand trimming Customers like the quality of the trimmer. They say it cuts their trimming time in half, does a perfectly fine job trimming, and is a great tool for trimming buds. Some mention it's faster than hand trimming. This bowl trimmer brings back that excitement. It does a perfectly fine job trimming , I've got no complaints with the end product for my personal use Too dry and buds got destroyed from the fingers, too wet and the trim was not as nice and buds stuck together inside the bowl As others mentioned, applying pressure to bend the blade will result in a much tighter trim Customers like the build quality of the garden shear scissors. They mention they're well-made, sturdy, and good enough for home use. Some say it's best to use solid buds and take out big stems. Looks and feels well built. My machine came with three different hand trimmers The finished product is good enough for home use. Customers like the design of the garden shear scissors. They say it looks good, works great, and has an innovative design. Some customers also mention that it shapes the buds to an aesthetically pleasing shape without trimming too much. That one issue alone but me out on it, hand trimmed buds are gorgeous. This machine makes pretty flowers look ugly and bland Takes away from quality of flower as it knocks off terpenes that are beneficial for medicinal purposes. Customers have mixed opinions about the ease of use of the garden shear scissors. Some mention they're easy to put together and trim pretty close, while others say they dislike that there are absolutely no instructions at all and the 1 page instructions don't cover replacing the blades. This thing is a huge time saver and works great! Does about an oz at a time. I loved how all the trim is easily accessible I. The bowl. Elbow ready to be scraped up to make bubble hash' Read more. No explanation on how to assemble the unit. I know it seems king of intuitive, but they have a blade for wet trimming and one for dry trimming Easy to use , sturdy and worth the price, you'll be super excited like a kid in a candy store like myself. Customers have mixed opinions about the size of the garden shear scissors. Some mention it's small, easy to maintenance, and disassemble, while others say it's almost too big and hard to handle. They also say it loses a lot of smaller product that slips through the grate. The blades aren't sharp and the machine is bulky and heavy the handle falls off constantly, and cleaning is a nightmare Customers have mixed opinions about the ease of cleaning the garden shear scissors. Some mention it's easy to use and clean, while others say it falls off constantly and cleaning is a nightmare. They also mention there are no descriptions for best cleaning practices or any cleaning information provided. This machine is small, easy to maintenance disassemble and clean , lightweight and durable Hard to clean. Much better than trimming all by hand. Crank handle is flimsy so you have to be careful not to bend it. Skip to main content Amazon. To see product details, add this item to your cart. You can always remove it later. FREE Returns Return this item for free We offer easy, convenient returns with at least one free return option: no shipping charges. Learn more about free returns. How to return the item? Go to your orders and start the return Select your preferred free shipping option Drop off and leave! Add to Cart. Enhancements you chose aren't available for this seller. Details To add the following enhancements to your purchase, choose a different seller. Ships from. Sold by. This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. Read full return policy. Gift options. Add at checkout. Add at checkout This item is a gift. At checkout, you can add a custom message, a gift receipt for easy returns and have the item gift-wrapped. Send this item as a gift. Secure transaction Your transaction is secure. We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. Learn more. Secure transaction. Ships in product packaging Ships in product packaging. Shows what's inside. Item often ships in manufacturer container to reduce packaging. To hide what's inside, choose Ship in Amazon packaging at checkout. Ships in product packaging. Add to List. Added to. Unable to add item to List. Please try again. Sorry, there was a problem. There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. List unavailable. Image Unavailable Image not available for Color:. Size: 19 inch. Purchase options and add-ons. Report an issue with this product or seller. Frequently bought together. Get it as soon as Wednesday, Oct Get it as soon as Monday, Oct To see our price, add these items to your cart. Try again! Added to Cart. Add all 3 to Cart. Some of these items ship sooner than the others. Show details Hide details. Choose items to buy together. Similar items that ship from close to you. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Previous set of slides. Get it as soon as Thursday, Oct Get it Oct 23 - Get it as soon as Friday, Oct Only 16 left in stock - order soon. Next set of slides. Item details Customer Reviews 4. Our Voluntary Day Return Guarantee does not affect your legal right of withdrawal in any way. You can find out more about the exceptions and conditions here. Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Price Availability Website Online. Store Offline. State: Please select province Please select province. Submit Feedback. Please sign in to provide feedback. From the brand. Previous page. Who are we? Smart Grow System Vivosun's smart grow system enables growers to master the elements for optimal lighting and ventilation to achieve ideal grow results. Witness the Miracle of Growth. Master All the Elements. You May Also Need. Shop Our Best Sellers. How did we get our start? Founded in California, Vivosun is a leading manufacturer of indoor horticultural equipment. What makes our products unique? Why do we love what we do? Next page. Brief content visible, double tap to read full content. Full content visible, double tap to read brief content. Page 1 of 1 Start Over Page 1 of 1. Videos for this product Click to play video. Customer Review: Works great. High quality build. Bud leaf teimmer. Product Description. See Details. Customer Reviews. Looking for specific info? Low Returns. Customers usually keep items from this brand. Compare with similar items This Item. AC Infinity. Stainless Steel. Customer reviews. How customer reviews and ratings work Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them. Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon. Customers say. Select to learn more. Images in this review. Reviews with images. See all photos. All photos. Was a little skeptical at first, but I watched some reviews and tips. More Hide. Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, there was an error. Sorry we couldn't load the review. Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews. Top reviews from the United States. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. Size: 19 inch Verified Purchase. I had had the Visosun bud trimmer recommended to me by a friend. I think it cut down my trim time by two thirds. One of the reviews said to spin it ten times in one direction and then ten times in the other. I found 15 times one way then reverse for ten spins worked well for me. Gotta say, we are so impressed with this machine! I purchased the bowl trimmer with doubts that it would work. So after reading a lot of the other reviews I felt it was necessary to leave my 2 cents. I'm not an expert, but i have a lot of firsthand experience with trim machines. First it seems like a lot of people are buying this hoping for some kind of amazing quality of trimming. Leave that expectation at the door. This machine is good for either A You have to much quantity and need to make your way through your material fast or B You're lazy and don't care about trim quality. I fall a bit into both categories, i do an outdoor grow and between the plants finishing and the wet season beginning is a very small window to take the plants down before they start to get affected by the weather. I also have a bit of arthritis so im a slow hand trimmer so this product helps get through this short transition period faster. Also it should be said Now with that expectation out of the way, lets talk about the machine. Packaging seemed solid albeit not discreet and came with two pairs of trim scissors and an extra blade. The CONS: This directions with this machine are laughable at best summed up as 'Put product in machine, spin, take product out' which all though they aren't wrong, there is a bit more nuance to getting the most out of this machine. MY INPUT: The issue with any trim machine, and why the quality will never be as good as hand trim, is due to the distance between the blade and the bud. Every trim machine uses some kind of grate to keep your hard grown bud from getting mulched by the blade. The distance from the top of the grate to the top of the blades is the closest shave your bud is ever going to get. How does that effect your bud while using this machine? If you put your bud in and expect to trim it till you get that 'perfect trim' it will be in here for a verrrry long time. At which point you're probably doing more harm than good. I found that 20 - 30 rotations of the handle were more than sufficient. I WOULD use this for wet trim fresh off the plant is best and between every batch use some form of lubricant cooking oil is alright, hemp oil is preferred, and products specifically designed for these machines are best otherwise the machines will get sticky and become significantly less efficient. My method is to buck the nugs into the machine till its at capacity, spin times, remove the bud for curing and drying, then at a later date when i have free time to go back over to get that nice finishing hand trim. I hope this helped! Happy growing. Let me tell you this thing has saved me hours of trim work. I take all big leaves off the plant and put into machine right as I harvest. Takes all the leaves down to tinny stubs. I then give it a quick trim with scissor and into my trays to dry. I have not tried the dry trim yet but will be soon. Just to see how it does. Just got it last afternoon. It was a big box. Had the instruction manual and accessories. It had the wet blade and it was ready to go in a snap. This unit is huge first of all. Consider the smaller units if you don't have the space. Only instructions I received were how to use it, but there are several extra parts in the package. I know it seems king of intuitive, but they have a blade for wet trimming and one for dry trimming. Mine came with the wet blade on, but here was a cross piece that wasn't attached. I went to the manufacture website and watched a video and paused it, took a screen shot and figured out I needed to attach that piece. Also the blade can be installed upsidown, no indicator on which way to do. Might not matter, but I made it match the pic in the screenshot I took. With that said, once I got it together properly, I used it on fresh cut wet material and it worked well, really well. I used the rubber mat at the bottom to catch the trimmings. It did an excellent job. Maybe a little touching up with the included trimmers they give you, but could go without that as well. Now that I got it together, it's a great unit, just wish there were better assembly instructions and explanations. Any time you have extra parts without an explanation makes you think you did something wrong. One person found this helpful. Verified Purchase. The media could not be loaded. See more reviews. Top reviews from other countries. I have had this for a few years now and it's an amazing time saver. What would have taken days is now done in hours with nice trim which is processed for resin all fan leaves removed first, takes the most time. Highly recommend also nice kif on the rubber fingers and grill. I am updating this review. Below is my original issue. I contacted Vivosun regarding this issue. They took the time to understand my issues and have corrected them accordingly. I have little to no issues with the smaller one but the larger one has such a long blade that it seems to bend a bit during operation. This leads to it tapping the underneath cage. Even with all the spacers it still will hit sometimes especially if the blade is cutting a lot of stem or wet herbs. Overall it still does the trick but I recommend the smaller one. Trim less at one time but no issues with blade and easier to spin. Large one is much more awkward when trying to put top on after loading and then spinning a giant tub. Good luck hope this helps. It's definitely bigger than I thought it would be. The picture in the add isn't the 19' bowl, it's the 16' version. The 19' has 4 silicon fingers per arm not three' so I was expecting what was advertised. Very happy it's bigger than the pic, it trims much more at a time, The inclusion of the silicon pad is very welcome. Works fantastic, saved me hours of clipping and getting finger hash all over my hands and tools. I recommend Amazon updates their picture to the right product It would sell more of them!! I wasn't sure if I'd like it, but after running a dozen plants through I've already saved enough of my time to justify the purchase. Cut the buds of the main stems, drop them into the bowl, and give er a good 30 second spin in each direction. Not the most beautiful trim job, but certainly passable. I smoked one of the buds, and it was smooth and tasty not woody or harsh. In case you're worried about loss, from 12 plants I ended up with a little over 4 lbs of dry bud. I trimmed wet, and dried the trim you'll want to have a large cardboard box to spread the trimmings over. Weighed, it was about 1 pound. After and during the drying and curing process, very little fell off. Almost no shake from the 4 pounds! Instructions were less than adequate. Cleaning is a chore. Back to top. Trim Bin See Details. Mesh Drying Rack Add to Cart. Hand Pruner Add to Cart. Cut bud leaf. Replacement blades. Trim and collect herbs. Dry herbs. Prune and cut plants. Length: 6. Stainless steel. Micron mesh screen. Wet Trimming and Dry Trimming. Backup blades. Trim herbs on this tray. Hanging,Foldable,Ground Mount. Aquariums, swimming pools. Gardening and cutting. Efficient cutting. Do clean. Make sure excellent airflow. Lightweight, handheld design. Reduce hand strain. Customer Ratings. Sold By.

Limpio buy hash