Latex Strings

Latex Strings




💣 👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻




















































https://juliapackages.com/p/latexstrings
Перевести · A LaTeXString class (a subtype of String), which works like a string (for indexing, conversion, etcetera), but automatically displays as text/latex in IJulia. L"..." and L"""...""" …
https://github.com/stevengj/LaTeXStrings.jl
Перевести · 08.02.2020 · A LaTeXString class (a subtype of String), which works like a string (for indexing, conversion, etcetera), but automatically displays as text/latex in IJulia. L"..." and L"""...""" …
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/96620/string-command-behavior-plain-tex
Перевести · Like you said the \string primitive converts a control sequence into a list of character tokens 1. It also works on other tokens and turns them into their string …
The ASCII code of \ is 92, and this is also TeX's internal code for the backslash. Now have a look at Appendix F of the TeXbook ( F like Font Ta...
Hendrik's answer is great. Nevertheless, please allow me to elaborate on \string and \escapechar a little more: Like you said the \string pri...
The theory How does \string work? There are various cases, but first of all one must be aware that it's a primitive command of TeX which just loo...
https://www.aliexpress.com/popular/latex-strings.html
Перевести · 2020 popular 1 trends in Sports & Entertainment, Shoes, Novelty & Special Use, Home & Garden with Latex Strings and 1. Discover over 4929 of our best selection of …
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/74707
Перевести · The technique with \edef is perfectly fine if all we need is to append (or prepend, or both) to a string of characters. It can work with other tokens, but let's limit …
What you want to achieve can be done in several ways. First of all let me start with a small hint: The commands \bf and it are obsolete and the...
Just an addition to Marco Daniel's excellent answer. The technique with \edef is perfectly fine if all we need is to append (or prepend, or both)...
this will work: \documentclass{report} \def\reptemp{I {\itshape love} rain} \expandafter\def\expandafter\reptemp\expandafter{\reptemp, but {\bfser...
Also, even though IJulia is capable of displaying formatted LaTeX equations (via MathJax ), an ordinary string will not exploit this. Therefore, the LaTeXStrings package defines: A LaTeXString class (a subtype of String ), which works like a string (for indexing, conversion, etcetera), but automatically displays as text/latex in IJulia. L"..."
github.com/stevengj/LaTeXStrings.jl
Do you need to use raw string literal in latex?
Do you need to use raw string literal in latex?
You need to escape the curly brackets by doubling them up, and then add in one more to use in the LaTeX formula. This gives: Incidentally, in this example, you don't actually need to use a raw-string literal. Not the answer you're looking for?
stackoverflow.com/questions/60150031/ho…
Failed to load latest commit information. This is a small package to make it easier to type LaTeX equations in string literals in the Julia language , written by Steven G. Johnson.
github.com/stevengj/LaTeXStrings.jl
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3126082
Перевести · LaTeX will change the right-hand side of the \edef into Hello world, and then reassign that to \textstring, which is what you want. Instead, in your current version, the \newcommand doesn't expand the right-hand side, so when you use \textstring , it expands to \textstring world , which itself expands to \textstring …
https://www.styleplanet.com/latex/damen-latexbekleidung/latexslip-latexstring
Перевести · Filter. Schließen. Latex Slip - 100% Handmade geklebt. Latex String Schwarz. Latex String Tanga - Schwarz. Sale - Damen Latex G-String. Latex Damenslip, Latextanga. Latex Slip - Dita. "Latex Slip & String …
https://restless-rubber.com/shop/latex-string-classic-herren
Перевести · Latex String Classic Herren. Betont durch den enganliegenden optimal die männlichen Konturen ! • Materialstärke – 0,4 mm • Materialstärke Bund – 0,4 …
https://www.latexkleding.org/index.php/latex-heren/latex-slip
Перевести · Bestel nu snel en discreet je latex heren string, shorts en slip op latexkleding. Een ruime collectie ondergoed in vele kleuren en maten online te kopen bij latexkleding
https://allegro.pl/listing?string=stringi latex
Перевести · Stringi latex na Allegro.pl - Zróżnicowany zbiór ofert, najlepsze ceny i promocje. Wejdź i znajdź to, czego szukasz!
Не удается получить доступ к вашему текущему расположению. Для получения лучших результатов предоставьте Bing доступ к данным о расположении или введите расположение.
Не удается получить доступ к расположению вашего устройства. Для получения лучших результатов введите расположение.

Sign up or log in to view your list.
I would like to learn Plain TeX and I'm reading Knuth's "The TeXBook". At Chapter 7, Knuth talks about the \string command and how it converts control sequences into lists of characters tokens.
Why when I typed \string\TeX, I got "TeX, but when I wrote {\tt \string\TeX} I got \TeX ?
I guess it's something related to \escapechar, because when I changed that control sequence the output changed too:
renyalvarado
renyalvarado 425●11 gold badge●44 silver badges●66 bronze badges
Martin Schröder
14.5k●88 gold badges●4646 silver badges●138138 bronze badges
The ASCII code of \ is 92, and this is also TeX's internal code for the backslash. Now have a look at Appendix F of the TeXbook (F like Font Tables). There you see that the typewriter font cmtt10 indeed has a \ sitting in position 92 (which is ´134 in octal notation), whereas the standard text font cmr10 has a quotation mark “ in that position. The reason for the latter is that in a standard text you'll need quotation marks quite often, but hardly ever a backslash.
If you want to procude the font tables yourself, use the following code (thanks to Stefan Kottwitz for the suggestion!):
Hendrik Vogt
Hendrik Vogt 35.1k●66 gold badges●121121 silver badges●204204 bronze badges
Hendrik's answer is great. Nevertheless, please allow me to elaborate on \string and \escapechar a little more:
Like you said the \string primitive converts a control sequence into a list of character tokens1. It also works on other tokens and turns them into their string representation. Two things are notable here: All characters with the exception of spaces are returned as category code (catcode) 12 "other", even if their where from catcode 11 "letter" beforehand. If the control sequence contained spaces (possible with \csname .. \endcsname) then they have still catcode 10 "space". This catcode change has no influence on typesetting or \writeing these characters.
Secondly, the backslash in the control sequence is not stored by TeX with every control sequence name. The backslash is only required to mark a control sequence as one and once that got tokenized it is no longer required. Also the backslash is not hard wired into TeX. Every character with the catcode 0 "escape character" will work. However by default the backslash is the only one character with this catcode. Because TeX doesn't store the escape character used for every particular control sequence it needs to get told how to represent it when it has to turn the control sequence back into a string. This is done using the \escapechar register2 which holds the ASCII number of the used character. By default it is that to 92 which is the number for the backslash. This register can be changed at will. If it contains a negative number, no escape character will be produced by \string at all. This fact is often used by (La)TeX code which like to get the macro name only. Has Hendrik already wrote in his great answer, you need to make sure that the escape character is available in the currently used font. Usually you are right when using a tt font.
So, for example \escapechar=`\A\catcode`\|=0 |string|foo will output Afoo, not \foo or |foo. After the catcode change TeX doesn't care here if you use | or \ and you can mix them as you want (Note that \\ can be written as |\ now but not as || because the second backslash is not an escape character). You are also not forced to keep \escapechar to a character of catcode 0.
1) Knuth, The TeXBook, page 40, paragraph 1, Chapter 7: How TEX Reads What You Type.
2) Knuth, The TeXBook, page 40, paragraph 6, Chapter 7: How TEX Reads What You Type.
Martin Scharrer♦
Martin Scharrer 238k●5454 gold badges●721721 silver badges●897897 bronze badges
How does \string work? There are various cases, but first of all one must be aware that it's a primitive command of TeX which just looks at the next token without expanding it. This lookup happens after the tokenization process, which can transform the input in various ways.
So we are interested in the expansion of \string
If is a character of any category code except 10 (including active characters) , the expansion is the same character with category code 12. Note, however, that can't have category 0, 9, 14 or 15, because such characters never reach the "mouth" where expansion takes place.
If is a character of category code 10, the expansion is the pair (32,10), that is, a normal space token of category code 10.
If is a character with code 32 and any category code, the expansion is the pair (32,10), as in the preceding case.
If is a control sequence, then the expansion of \string is the control sequence's name preceded by the character having character code equal to the current value of \escapechar. All characters in this expansion will have category code 12, except spaces that are normalized to normal space tokens with character code 32 and category code 10. The control sequence needn't be defined and it won't be stored in the hash table.
However, if the value of \escapechar is less than 0 or greater than 255, no character will be added at the start of the returned string. The upper limit is 2097151, that is 0x1FFFFF, for XeTeX and LuaTeX.
(the missing space between o and . shows that \foo isn't a control sequence). Instead \escapechar=`A \edef\x{\string\foo}\show\x will return
The question about the printed output of \string\foo is a different story; if one says \char`\\, TeX will print whatever character is in slot 92 of the current font, which might be a backslash or not. It isn't in the standard Plain TeX font \tenrm, that is cmr10, but it is in cmtt10. The same will happen when printing the string resulting from \string\foo.
egreg
egreg 905k●116116 gold badges●23102310 silver badges●37723772 bronze badges
Click here to upload your image (max 2 MiB)
You can also provide a link from the web.
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy
2021 Stack Exchange, Inc. user contributions under cc by-sa
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Accept all cookies Customize settings

Matplotlib Latex
Royal Latex
Latex Uniform
Vim Latex
Marie Latex
LaTeXStrings · Julia Packages
GitHub - stevengj/LaTeXStrings.jl: convenient input and ...
\\string command behavior - Plain TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange
Best value Latex Strings – Great deals on Latex Strings ...
Latex Slip - Latex String - Latex Höschen Slip - Latex ...
Latex String Classic Herren • restless rubber Latex Design
Latex slip | latex heren slips en strings bestellen ...
Stringi latex - Niska cena na Allegro.pl
Latex Strings


Report Page