Buying coke Lech

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Buying coke Lech

Timely and urgent, but not in the daily papers, Blow It to Bits is the story of workers who threaten to blow up a factory. A dense, entertaining, informative, and thought-provoking documentary, which clearly exposes the enemy within. The director is Lech Kowalski. Born in London to Polish refugees who survived Stalin's gulags, he now lives in France, making underground films that are a map of his personal journey. Meeting him at the Filmmaker Film Festival, in Milan, he told me about his movie:. Initially a booming business, the factory whittled down over the years as production shifted overseas, as most French cars are now composed of parts produced abroad and then only assembled in France. Kowalski heard that the workers had taken over the factory and to defend their jobs were threatening to blow it up if their demand to continue production was not met. It was very depressing because there were suicides, it was just terrible, a lot of them moved away. But what was interesting is some of them were still in court, fighting to get some money for eight years. The story I wanted to tell was about workers that live away from the big cities. I decided I'm going to stay here, because these people are innocent. They had a place in society, they used to live lives in a way they wanted. They had their fishing or hunting passion. They're very intelligent people and they were fighting for something. They were fighting also for their lifestyle. How did you develop your story? I liked how they stand up to power with an unusual confidence in confronting the new order. I wanted to make a film about the people. I didn't tell them that I was making a film right away. They thought I was a journalist, filming and filming. I didn't really want to get too close to them, because I wanted to observe them from the point of view of how the society sees them. The idea was to make it a collective film, not a film about the leader. Because the collective action was what gave them the strength. It was not really a fight against Renault and Peugeot so much. It was a fight against the government. Because the government was not supporting them. It's very hard to fight Renault and Peugeot, they have a lot of power. You can do a few things; you can have a blockade and this kind of thing. But what they were angry about was that there was no one to turn to for help, from across the political spectrum. Politicians were antagonistic towards them. For me this fight was a search for a new kind of democracy. I really wanted to make a film that the workers would enjoy, from an aesthetic point of view. It's not an action film, like a Hollywood film. It's a film made for the class that I am part of. And the class that the film is about. My father and my mother both were workers. I wanted to make a film that's for the average person who normally would not go to see this kind of film. It started out as a toy factory and it got bigger, bigger and bigger. And at that point, there was a threat to close the factory down completely. The factory used to have workers a long time ago. Over the years with different owners, it became smaller and smaller and smaller. Most of the workers were in their 40s, 50s and even 60s. For them there was no future. How can you get a new job at that age? In some respects, they have won. Because the new owner bought the factory and although he fired half the people, he kept This whole problem with the factories, and this whole problem with the changing of our society, it's happening because multinational corporations are trying to find ways to make as much profit as possible. Not necessarily even for themselves, but for the stockholders. Because at the end of the day, the stockholders are the ones that empower. These companies relocate to places where the employment laws are less strong, but also where other laws are different. Because for instance, there are fewer laws for preserving the environment in these new places where these factories are being built, like Romania, Morocco, South America, Mexico, China, and Vietnam. The laws are very loose and people who work in these factories are very close to slaves. At the same time, these companies are making more profit and squeezing more money out of every aspect of the manufacturing process. I was very impressed about their mood. When they block the high speed lane on the motorway, they are not aggressive or violent. Is it solidarity that makes them so optimistic and strong? This is an interesting question for me. It's kind of a mystery why they had this kind of optimism and this kind of deep commitment, emotional commitment, to keep going. I think when you are fighting for something, you transfer your emotions into a kind of anger and frustration with the system. Then you want to be together to fight and get as much as you can. Because there is this desire to fight for a moral kind of victory. The fight becomes more important than winning or losing. These are like partisans. At one point you know that maybe you'll get killed, but you go out there because you believe in what you're doing. And that's why this film is important for me. The story is hopeful because we knew as we were filming, the workers, and myself, and Odil his partner and producer , we knew what this was not going to end well. Because it never does. Because the corporate system and the government is just too against these people to make it work. But they did get workers to keep their jobs, which is a victory. The glass is half full or half empty, I would like to say that the glass is very full — of hope. Rita di Santo interviews the British director Lech Kowalski, director of of Blow It to Bits Timely and urgent, but not in the daily papers, Blow It to Bits is the story of workers who threaten to blow up a factory. What was your main aim? Read more Subscribe to this RSS feed.

Blow It to Bits

Buying coke Lech

A long-term study of the lives of Harvard graduates, published in , found that those who had had a close relationship with siblings at college age were the ones most likely to be happy at age 65 1. The finding surprised scientists and lay readers alike. They were too busy trying to keep the boys in one piece so that they could reach college age. The boys were young enough to be distracted. They interpreted her desperation as enthusiasm, so they entered into the game. The truce lasted ten minutes. Cain kills Abel. His brothers Shem and Japheth defend Noah. Is not the entire land before you? Separate from me, please, if you go to the left then I will go right, and if you go right, then I will go left. He acknowledges that a quarrel could develop, rather than ignoring the tension or plunging headlong into a fight. Rather than casting blame, Abraham concentrates on how a quarrel can be avoided. He realizes that he and Lot must put some distance between each other, and lets Lot choose which land he will take. It is tempting to speculate that he weathered a crisis with Lot based on watching his own parents. If they fight, it is only over which explanation of the Gemara is correct. Their parents, who have had their disagreements, but who consistently help and comfort each other and many others as well, have led them on the path from sibling rivalry to sibling chivalry. Amid the frequent sibling rivalry in Genesis, the seeds of reconciliation that Abraham plants will bear wondrous fruit. The marriage of Boaz and Ruth, two descendants of Abraham and Lot, brings the birth of King David many generations later. From King David will come the Messiah.

Buying coke Lech