Karbala buy blow

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Karbala buy blow

The Israeli army has slaughtered more than 37, Palestinians, most of them women and children. However, the Netanyahu regime has not only failed to eliminate Hamas but it has recently been dealt crushing blows at the hands of resistance fighters. Speaking during a panel discussion on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference in Germany in February, EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said Israel cannot defeat Hamas through military means. According to a report published late on Monday by the Wall Street Journal, Yahya Sinwar, the military leader of Hamas, has said resistance fighters have the upper hand over Israel in the war in Gaza. He has drawn a comparison between the Israeli carnage in Gaza with the Battle of Karbala. Imam Hossein, the third Shia Imam, and his 72 companions were martyred in the Battle of Karbala in southern Iraq in AD after fighting courageously for justice against the much larger army of the then tyrant and illegitimate ruler Yazid. Muslims in certain countries hold huge mourning ceremonies every year to mark the occasion. The WSJ report comes days after Israel massacred more than Palestinians in central Gaza as it tried to release four captives from the Nuseirat refugee camp which sparked huge global outrage. Sinwar: 'There may be a new Karbala' International. Power of Palestinian resistance According to a report published late on Monday by the Wall Street Journal, Yahya Sinwar, the military leader of Hamas, has said resistance fighters have the upper hand over Israel in the war in Gaza. Israel's nightmare. Yahya Sinwar Israel Gaza. Your Message.

Two bomb blasts strike pilgrims in Iraq city of Karbala

Karbala buy blow

What happened on the plains of Karbala continues to have an effect even today across the Muslim Ummah. It is thus very important to know the unadulterated truth from authentic sources and sift the muddled fiction that is spread by the Shia. One of the leading sources of the battle of Karbala is the historian Abu Mikhnaf, Lut ibn Yahya who was declared to be a major liar by the scholars of hadith. His narrations are severely exaggerated and filled with many fabrications. Despite coming a hundred years after Karbala, Abu Mikhnaf claimed to have many secret letters that were sent by Hussain, Muslim, Yazid, Ibn Ziyad and others. Any mention of him as a reference needs to raise an immediate red flag for the reader. Around years later, another work under the same title and name of Abu Mikhnaf surfaces and the content is now even more exaggerated and fabricated. This is then relied upon by Shia and also some Sunni sources. This point is highlighted to show us the importance of checking our sources and making sure we take knowledge from authentic sources. Another important point to be mentioned is that Karbala has a very important historical significance no doubt, but holds no weight from the perspective of the Shariah. The land of Karbala holds no virtue but the ones who got betrayed and martyred at Karbala hold the highest virtue and honour. It is upon us to learn the lives of those martyred at Karbala and follow the path of tawheed just as they did. There are two prophecies that we should take note of here. Seeing the treacherous past of the Kufans, how they had troubled his father, and who were now supposedly supporting him, Hasan went ahead and concluded a peace treaty between himself and Mu'awiyah in 41 AH. When Umar was dying, he made it a consultation between six and he Ali was one of them and he was sure that it would not miss him this time! Then, he struck with his hand and came up with red clay. In reality, Yazid has gone down as one of the most evil and unjust rulers in our history. To say that Yazid was an open drunkard and fornicator is a fabrication that has been inauthentically attributed to him. If that was the case, the bulk of the sahaba would not have silently pledged allegiance to him. Ibn al-Hanafiyyah blatantly refused. Instead I stayed by him and found him punctual on prayers, pursuing good, asking matters of din and steadfast on the Sunnah. In the meantime, Abdur Rahman and Mu'awiyah had both passed away. After assuming authority, Yazid asked everyone via his governors to pledge allegiance to him. Marwan pushed Waleed to get them to pledge allegiance there and if not, then kill them for dissent. Eventually, both Hussain and Ibn Zubair got away and found their way to Makkah. It is reported that Ibn Zubair told him that if he had enjoyed the support as Hussain did in Kufa, he would have gone out to be with them. It was during this period that groups in Kufa in present-day Iraq sent over letters to Hussain, inviting him to come to Kufa such that people could pledge allegiance to him instead. They warned him that the situation in Kufa was not as supportive as it seemed and that the people who had sent invitations might not remain loyal to their cause when faced with the might of the Umayyad forces and also how they had deceived his father and brother. He was also cautioned by many in Makkah not to proceed. Ibn Abbas on seeing Hussain's resolve to leave, suggested him to go to Yemen instead where there were many supporters of Ali and if not, then at least proceed without the women and children to Kufa. Before departing for Kufa in 61 AH, he sent Muslim ibn Aqeel ibn Abi Talib, his cousin, and a trusted companion, ahead to gather information about the situation and the sincerity of the people's support. Muslim ibn Aqeel arrived in Kufa and was initially welcomed by a significant number of people who pledged their allegiance to Hussain. He met many of the Kufans here who came and promised their support for Hussain. The situation quickly changed, and the supporters of Hussain became hesitant due to the threats from Ibn Ziyad and they flipped. Muslim had written and dispatched a second letter to Hussain updating and warning him of the turn of events. Via a network of treachery and spies, Ibn Ziyad was able to find out that Muslim was hiding at the house of Hani. On hearing of the capture of Hani, Muslim went out with the supporters to the house of Ibn Ziyad. These so-called supporters numbered over 40, Ibn Ziyad threatened the people of a severe retaliation if they proceeded in their support and within a little time, only five thousand or so were left. With these drastically shrinking numbers, Muslim continued to proceed towards the house of Ibn Ziyad. Ibn Ziyad to gibe them a taste of his cruelty, took the captured Hani to the top of his house and threw him down to his death. Seeing this, many of the Kufans abandoned Muslim till he was left with less than people around him. Ibn Ziyad again threatened the supporters and told them that they were so few in number now that he could easily count them. Not just that, but that he would wipe them as well as their families and houses out completely. Hearing this, more people abandoned Muslim till he was left with less than 50 supporters. They took refuge in Masjid al-Ansar. Ibn Ziyad had the roof of the masjid ripped open and the people were attacked. Muslim was injured as he fled from the masjid. He sought refuge in the house of a lady from the Kinda tribe. He was eventually betrayed and handed over to the authorities by the same Kufan people. Muslim ibn Aqeel was brutally executed publically in Kufa and his body thrown off the top of the building just like Hani ibn Urwah at the command of Ibn Ziyad. This marked the beginning of a series of betrayals and tragic events leading to the Battle of Karbala. He had decided to proceed only because of the invitation of the Kufans and also because he did not want to cause any strife and bloodshed in Madinah. If he was indeed going for war to Kufa, he wouldn't have travelled with the women and children of his family. It was only when he reached close to Kufah that he was informed of the murder of his cousin. He wanted to return but the sons of Muslim ibn Aqeel wanted to proceed and take the rights of their father. It is also interesting to note that Karbala lies on the way to al-Shaam which is where Yazid was based and not Kufa where Hussain was initially heading towards. This change in direction shows us that he wanted to speak to Yazid and settle the matter directly. He continued the journey until reached a place called Qatfiyyah, where there was an army of 1, men of Ibn Ziyad present whose commander was Hurr ibn Yazid al-Tamimi. It is interesting to note that Ibn Ziyad had come from Syria with less than 20 men. Where did so many other men come from? Historians on both sides are unanimously agreed that these were the Kufans who had initially claimed to be the Shia of Ali. As words were exchanged, a 4,strong army of Umar ibn Sa'ad joined them, confronted Hussain, and conveyed Yazid's demand for allegiance. On seeing the negative response and understanding the gravity of the situation, he offered the army that came to fight him for one of three things:. Ibn Ziyad ordered Shimar to take over the leading, be a commander, remove Umar if he caused any issues, and take care of Hussain. He did not cry and beg for his life as many of the Shia sources portray him to have done. The opposing forces of Ibn Ziyad surrounded Hussain's camp, insisted that Hussain surrender and pledge allegiance right then and there instead of proceeding in any direction, and also cut off their access to the Euphrates River. The Shia exaggerate and make it look as though this lasted for many days. The tragedy at Karbala began and the initial signs of victory were in the camp of Hussain even though many of his family members were martyred. Abbas was the standard-bearer of Hussain's army and played a crucial role in providing water for the thirsty children and companions. He was martyred while trying to fetch water from the river. Despite their small numbers, not more than people, the group of Hussain fought bravely against nearly men. It was a family and not an army that was fighting an army. The Kufan army had to bring in archers to break the resistance. In the final moments of the battle on Friday, the 10th of Muharram in 61 AH, Hussain was severely wounded and fell to the ground at 58 years of age. A man named Sinan ibn Abi Amr then advanced and attacked Hussain with a spear and put him to the ground. Upon the order of Shimar, Sinan then dismounted from his horse and killed him. Hands tremble and pens break as we write this. This was the most despicable crime and heinous murder someone could commit. Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad and his group that went ahead to kill the Ahl al-Bayt on their own accord without any orders from al-Shaam. Years later, Sinan met Hajjaj ibn Yusuf. A meeting of tyrants and killers. He was an elderly dark man, with henna, a long nose, and discolouration on his face. He stood towards al-Hajjaj and al-Hajjaj looked at him. This is one of the most authentic narrations we have on this matter. After the battle, Yazid's forces plundered their camps. Do you wish to kill a child? Seeing the situation, he immediately ordered that none should enter the tent in which the women were present and that the ill youngster be left alone. He also ordered that all the looted possessions be returned, but nothing was brought back. Before that, he was making a mockery of the head of Hussain. In al-Shaam, Yazid expressed regret and washed his hands off from the actions of his envoys in Kufa. Even though Yazid did not explicitly order the killing of Hussain, he did issue orders that Hussain be resisted and his efforts to become a leader were to be hindered, even if that meant fighting him. Despite speaking words of regret to the family of Hussain, he did not take any action against the killers to show his disapproval of the murder or to avenge him, when he should have done that. A man to take note of in all this is Mukhtar ibn Abu Ubayd al-Thaqafi who is one of the biggest liars and dajjals in this Ummah. It was he who pushed the Kufans to call Hussain to Kufa, hosted Muslim ibn Aqeel and then abandoned him to be killed. He would then go on to say that it was him who was actually the Mahdi, and then lay claim of being a Prophet himself, and finally to take the step of declaring himself as the Almighty incarnated. His satanic movement was finally brought to an end after years of harming the Muslims when Abdullah ibn Zubair ordered his brother, Mus'ab ibn Zubair to stop him in his tracks and execute him. I reached them as they were saying: 'It comes! It comes! They then said: 'It comes! The closest people to Allah are those that are tested the most. A man is put to trial according to his religion. If he is firm in his religion, his trials will be more severe. If he is weak in his religion, he is put to trial according to his strength in religion. The servant will continue to be put to trial until he is left walking upon the earth without any sin. So many people take it to be a month where marriages etc are impermissible as it is a month of mourning. This is completely baseless and an innovation. A principle needs to be understood here. If the Shariah has not singled out a day to be a day of religious mourning or evil , no incident in the world can make it into a day of mourning. There is no day of mourning or evil in the Shariah of Muhammad. If the Shariah has not singled out a day to be a day or religious celebration Eid , no incident in the world can make it into a day of Eid. No death or birth is to bring something new into the religion. The pages of Islamic History are filled with the blood of the martyrs. Should we begin to mourn the martyrdom of the sahabah alone, every other day would be a day of mourning. In fact, it was a blessing of Allah upon him that he was granted martyrdom in this blessed month. Therefore, the host of baseless customs with regard to his martyrdom must be discarded. There are two extremes and both are to be rejected. One side makes it a month of mourning Shia and those make it a month of widespread celebration Nasibi and Khawarij. The Ummah stays in the middle and does not exaggerate in either. Look at the inconsistency of the Shia themselves. The Shia themselves have never done for Ali like what they do for al-Hussain even though Ali is better than his son. Therefore Allah bestowed favours upon Hasan and Hussain as He willed and wished, through trials so that the ranks of both of them may be elevated. And that was out of their honour and respect and not out of their disgrace, just as Allah honoured Hamza, Ali, Jafar, Umar and Uthman and others through martyrdom. Our mothers' stature is cemented in the Quran and will be recited till the Day of Judgement. And the first to embrace Islam of the Muhajirun and the Ansar, and also those who followed them exactly in Faith. Allah is well-pleased with them as they are well-pleased with Him. He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow Paradise , to dwell therein forever. That is the supreme success. This shows how mighty the station and status of all companions are! Whoever loves them, Allah will love him, and whoever hates them, Allah will hate him. Do you want to know the status of these 2 men? See where they are buried today and who is their neighbour. Because anyone who curses Abu Bakr has rejected the Quran and gone against it. He is cut off from the group of Muslims due to this action. He was considered the most knowledgeable on the Quran after the Sahabah. Suddenly I felt somebody taking hold of my shoulder and found out that he was Ali bin Abi Talib. You have not left behind you a person whose deeds I like to imitate and meet Allah with more than I like your deeds. By Allah! Our Sheikh, Dr. Their religion is based on a very shaky foundation. Try and detach them from their deviated sources. Many a time, when we tell them what their own books teach, they will be shocked. For such people, don't mention any other names. The sahaba are one entity. You cannot separate them where you love a group from them and hate another. Show such people the love and respect that the sahaba had among themselves. Umar married into the house of Ali. Ali named his children after Abu Bakr and Umar. If they were against each other then would they act like this? Even culturally, we know that if you want to know about a person, you look at his friends. In reality, this is a way such evil people are trying to attack the Sunnah. If the sahaba fall, the Sunnah falls, as the Sunnah has reached us only through the service of the sahaba. It is enough for anyone and everyone to know that Allah, the All-Knowing has mentioned in the Quran that He is Pleased with the sahaba. Verily, I am only a servant, so refer to me as the servant of Allah and His Messenger. How can we call upon Hussain when we cannot even call upon his blessed grandfather. Hussain is free from all this. Shia basically refers to - a group. When he left Madinah, he had tawakkul on Allah alone. When he was in Makkah, he had tawakkul on Allah alone. When he arrived at Kufa, he invoked Allah to help him against the tyrants. When he was in Karbala, standing against the enemies, he was supplicating to Allah alone to grant him power and patience. When his children were martyred, he praised Allah for their sacrifices. When he entered the battlefield, he asked Allah to help him with his blessed sword. He set an example for this Ummah that a Monotheist will prostrate only to Allah whatever the situation is. He didn't invoke anyone other than Allah to help him in his fight against falsehood. Love us Ahl al-Bayt with the love of Islam, and do not love us with the love of idols, for the way that you love us has become so bad that it is something which we are ashamed of. There is no deity except You, O Helper Giyath of the seekers of help. I have no Rabb besides You, nor there is any other Lord except You. Judge between me and them, and You are the best of judges. Aid Me! Let that marinate for a minute. If he had no power to help himself and his family when alive, how can he help you when he has passed away? Taziya originally means condolence or expression of grief. In Persia, it used to depict and reenact the martyrdom of Hussain and in India it used to refer to mourning processions that carried miniature mausoleums intended to depict Karbala across the streets and buried on the 10th. This practice was a gift from India to the Shia. Another origin story that seems to be more established is that this practice was established by the evil Mongol King Taimur, also called Timur the Lame or Tamerlane as he was paralysed from the right side of the body. In A. He ordered to make a replica of the shrine so that he could perform the rituals. To appease him some mud from Karbala was brought and due to the shortage of time, the replica was made by bamboo and papers in AH. Looking at this, Sultans in the Awadh region and those around Delhi also started imitating this practice. Likewise to appease these rulers, their followers and subjects Muslims and non-Muslims also started making a fanfare out of it till this practice spread across the lands. Since then this practice called 'taziadari' came into existence. This practice was continued in the time of the Mughal rulers as well. He became a Shia as he sought help from the Persian Empire to regain his kingdom. In Persia or Iran, on the 10th of Ashura, people used to come to mourn at the grave of Hussain. Coming to Iran on a yearly basis was not feasible so they started making taziya and replica graves or domes and mourning similar to the way in Iran to commemorate the Day of Karbala. As the years went by, many things kept getting added into it. The people were influenced heavily by Hindu ceremonies and aped them. The Hindu festival of Dusshera a holiday marking the triumph of Rama, an avatar of Vishnu, over the headed demon king Ravana, was celebrated for 10 days, and so these Muslims also started celebrating and carrying out processions for 10 days in Ashura. Just like there is a fight depicted in Hindu beliefs and stories of Ramlila, they depicted the fight of Karbala here. Even the Shia in the Arab lands wrote that such was unheard of for them and it originated in India. Seeing the success and the crowds that such things pulled, it was adopted by Shias around the globe as well. Participating in such processions is completely impermissible and a grave sin as these taziya are venerated, worshipped, and called upon. Other than the grave sin of shirk, it is the epitome of imitating and propagating the practices of the disbelievers. Self-flagellation is another very infamous practice associated with Muharram. Sheikh Ebn Hussein writes in detail on this practice, a few points from which to shed light on this are - It is a form of devotional practice of flogging oneself with whips or other instruments that inflict pain as a sign of remorse or repentance. This is completely impermissible in Islam. Self-flagellation rituals are said to be first found practiced among the members of several Greco- Roman and Egyptian cults and the Sparta Arthemis Orthia. The cult of Isis in Egypt and the Dionysian cult of Greece practiced flagellation. Women were flogged during the Roman Lupercalia to ensure fertility. Self-punishment in the form of self-flagellation known as the mortification of the flesh in Christianity has its origins in fourth-century Europe and was a common practice until the medieval era. Hindus have a number of self-punishment rituals and festivals such as Garudan Thookkam and Thaipusam. And whether it includes bloodletting or not, whipping oneself with chains as done in many regions of Iran is a pagan heresy unknown to Islam, brought to Iran by the Safavids who copied it from the Christians and spread it to the rest of the Shia communities from Iraq to the Indian Subcontinent. I swear upon you that in case I die you shall not tear your clothes, nor scratch your face, nor curse anyone for me or pray for your death. May Allah guide to the truth those who claim to love and stand by the family of His Messenger. Hold firmly to it as if biting with your molar teeth. Beware of newly invented matters in religion, for every new matter is an innovation and every innovation is misguidance. Published in. It is thus very important to know the unadulterated truth from authentic sources and sift the muddled fiction that is spread by the shia. Mohammad Zahid. On seeing the negative response and understanding the gravity of the situation, he offered the army that came to fight him for one of three things: To let him return to Makkah. To let him go to Yazid in al-Shaam, meet him, and give the pledge hand upon hand personally. To let him go to the frontier to fight in jihad for the sake of Allah. More Articles. Our Latest. Be the first to know. Thank you! Your submission has been received! Matters of the Heart. All rights reserved. Powered by. Style guide.

Karbala buy blow