Alt Sex Stories Newsgroups

Alt Sex Stories Newsgroups




πŸ‘‰πŸ»πŸ‘‰πŸ»πŸ‘‰πŸ» ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE πŸ‘ˆπŸ»πŸ‘ˆπŸ»πŸ‘ˆπŸ»




















































This is a partial list of newsgroups that are significant for their popularity or their position in Usenet history.
These are the most widely distributed and carefully controlled newsgroup hierarchies. See Big 8 (Usenet) and the Great Renaming for more information.
Topics related to the humanities (fine arts, literature, philosophy, Classical Latin, etc.).
Miscellaneous topics. Examples include:
Matters related to the functioning of Usenet itself. Examples include:
Recreation and entertainment topics. Examples include these:
Discussion related to society and social subcultures. Examples include:
Discussion of various topics, especially controversial ones. Includes political topics as well. Examples include:
This is the most extensive newsgroup hierarchy outside of the Big 8. Examples include:
These newsgroups fall outside of the official Big 8 hierarchies, as well as the less formal alt hierarchy. Other newsgroups can consist of geographic regions (official or unofficial), corporations, and other institutions or groups.
^ Sack, Victor (20 October 2016), rec.food.cooking FAQ and conversion file, sec. 9.1
^ "Brad Templeton's Rec.Humor.Funny". Retrieved August 8, 2019.
^ Auerbach, David (August 20, 2014). "The First Gay Space on the Internet". Retrieved 8 May 2018.
^ Mutz, John (2010). Fundraising For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. ISBNΒ 978-0-7645-9847-0.
^ Cravens, Jayne. "A Brief Review of the Early History of Nonprofits and the Internet (before 1996)". Retrieved 8 May 2018.
^ Bickerton, Pauline (2007). Cybermarketing. Taylor & Francis. ISBNΒ 0 7506 4704 3.
^ "The Usenet Warez FAQ". November 22, 1997. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
^ Roberts, E. (January 1999). "Internet Piracy". Retrieved January 29, 2021.
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.

This is precisely the basis for claiming that there is no legal status
for declaring a newsgroup obscene. I suggest to you that the
appropriate level of separation is at the article, not the news group
level. The authors of the articles in a news group are discrete, and
unless it is a moderated group, there is no one central point that can
be regarded as controlling the content of the group.
"newsgroups" don't really exist in any meaningful way. Because any
user anywhere can put anything in any news group, there is no actual
correspondence between the newsgroup and it's contents. Thus the
groups don't really exist as a container for "tainted" material, they
are only convenient labels for users to hang on the front of their
articles. This is in fact the way they are transmitted: an article
arrives, and the news server reads the "newsgroups" line to decide
where to put it in the news spool. But it was the author of the
article that decided what to put in the "newsgroups" line. Check out
the "newsgroups" line at the top of this article for an example.
Crispin
-----
Crispin Cowan, CS PhD student, University of Western Ontario
Phyz-mail: Middlesex College, MC28-C, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7
E-mail: cri...@csd.uwo.ca Voice: 519-661-3342
"If you see a skier, turn. Trees too." Burton rendition of the
Skier's^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Snowboarder's Responsibility Code


>(a more interesting question might be how much material is tainted by
>inclusion with obscene material -- that is, what parallel to the
>separation of one magazine being separate from another exists within
>Usenet?).

I don't know the law in Canada, but in the U.S., obscene material does
not "taint" nonobscene material. Instead, nonobscene material
"purifies" obscene material.
In other words, (in the U.S.) a work must be considered as a whole.
If the whole has "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific
value", then it is not obscene even if a part,considered in isolation,
would be considered obscene.
(All these documents are available on-line. Access information follows.)
=================
law/miller
=================
* Expression -- Obscenity -- Law -- Miller
The Supreme Court's definition of obscenity (the so-called _Miller_
test)
=================
law/r-v-butler.ms
=================
* Expression -- Obscenity -- Canada -- Ms. -- R. v. Butler
Information on the Canadian definition of obscenity from _Ms._
magazine.
=================
law/r-v-butler
=================
* Expression -- Obscenity -- Canada -- R. v. Butler
The official summary and excerpts from the full decision in the case
of _R. v. Butler_. This Canadian Supreme Court case, decided in
February 1992, redefined "obscenity" in Canada.
If you have gopher, you can browse the CAF archive with the command
gopher gopher.eff.org
These document(s) are also available by anonymous ftp (the preferred
method) and by email. To get the file(s) via ftp, do an anonymous ftp
to ftp.eff.org (192.77.172.4), and get file(s):
pub/CAF/law/miller
pub/CAF/law/r-v-butler.ms
pub/CAF/law/r-v-butler
To get the file(s) by email, send email to archive...@eff.org.
Include the line(s) (be sure to include the space before the file
name):
send acad-freedom/law miller
send acad-freedom/law r-v-butler.ms
send acad-freedom/law r-v-butler
--
Carl Kadie -- I do not represent any organization; this is just me.
= ka...@cs.uiuc.edu =

In article ka...@cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M Kadie) writes:
|Brad `Squid' Shapcott wrote:
|
|[...]
|>(a more interesting question might be how much material is tainted by
|>inclusion with obscene material -- that is, what parallel to the
|>separation of one magazine being separate from another exists within
|>Usenet?).
|[...]
|
|I don't know the law in Canada, but in the U.S., obscene material does
|not "taint" nonobscene material. Instead, nonobscene material
|"purifies" obscene material.
|
|In other words, (in the U.S.) a work must be considered as a whole.
|If the whole has "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific
|value", then it is not obscene even if a part,considered in isolation,
|would be considered obscene.


A test of this would be to see if the "uw"
namespace would be tainted by creation of
"uw.sex.stories", "uw.tasteless", etc.

I am teetering on the verge of auto-reposting
the corresponding banned "alt." newsgroups
into their "uw." equivalents...

--
,u, Bruce Becker Toronto, Ontario
a /i/ b...@gwendolyn.gts.org ...!gts!gwendolyn!bdb
`\o\-e ./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\./\.
_< /_ "Dogs, bite your masters" - Porfirio Graffitti


Sex V Basseyne
Https Sex Tv
Sex Incest Manga
Sex Roliki Incest
Best Sex In Paris
alt newsgroups - W3
List of newsgroups - Wikipedia
Today in alt.sex.stories - Google Groups
Uncensored List of Usenet Newsgroups
CNN - Banned Newsgroups - Dec. 29, 1995
Technofetishism and the Uncanny Desires of A.S.F.R. (alt ...
Snuff Stories from East Quad - Ann Arbor Observer
Stories of child sex abuse in South Africa | Child Rights ...
At 8 Years Old, My Mother's Boyfriend Made Me His Sex ...
Six Of The Most Shocking Real Life Incest Stories ...
Alt Sex Stories Newsgroups


Report Page