After Submission

After Submission

Breadcrumb

Home

Editing Services

Manuscript Tips

After Submission

Writing a Manuscript: After Submission

© 2022 The University of Iowa

Privacy Notice

Nondiscrimination Statement

Accessibility

UI Indigenous Land Acknowledgement

You have submitted your manuscript. Congratulations! Now what?
Dr. John Smith, Editor in Chief Medical Journal
Re: Manuscript ID #MJ2020-01-114, Revision
On behalf of my coauthors, we appreciate the opportunity to revise and strengthen our paper. We have added new data and further discussed the implications of our findings. Specific revisions are outlined below.
Reviewer 1, Comment 1: The authors should include a discussion about their work differs from the report by Allgood et al (2018).
Response: We considered the work by Allgood and determined that our methods differed too greatly for proper comparison; thus we did not mention the Allgood work previously. However, we agree that discussing the discrepancy may provide some clarity, and have added several sentences addressing this in the Discussion section.
Reviewer 1, Comment 2: I suggest the authors rerun the data provided in the chart in Figure 2 using a different method.
Response: We thank the reviewer for this comment. We consulted with a biostatistician and have reworked Figure 2, which now demonstrates our results more clearly.
Comment 1: References are not in compliance with journal format.
Response: We have carefully reviewed each reference and reformatted as needed.
Again, we wish to thank the editors for the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We hope it now meets journal standards.
E328-1 GH
200 Hawkins Drive
Iowa City, IA 52241

Web technology reference for developers
Code used to describe document style
Protocol for transmitting web resources
Interfaces for building web applications
Developing extensions for web browsers
Web technology reference for developers
Learn to structure web content with HTML
Learn to run scripts in the browser
Learn to make the web accessible to all
Frequently asked questions about MDN Plus
Your blueprint for a better internet.
Visit Mozilla Corporation’s not-for-profit parent, the Mozilla Foundation . Portions of this content are ©1998– 2022 by individual mozilla.org contributors. Content available under a Creative Commons license .

Our Stats

1000K+ Monthly Readers
350K+ Subscribers
200K+ Followers

Articles

Podcasts

Webinars

EBooks

Checklists

Infographics

Q&A

Research Guide

Researcher Hub

Your manuscript has been accepted, so what happens next? Generally, this is a three-step process: manuscript submission , peer review, and post-acceptance preparation. After a manuscript is submitted to a target journal, it undergoes peer review. However, several steps occur that often only the corresponding author is aware of. Once submitted to a journal, the manuscript travels around quite a bit and the manuscript status is followed using the manuscript number. The manuscript is either accepted or rejected . Following peer review, if a manuscript is accepted, it then undergoes proof development and a review process prior to publication. This process is often tedious as it requires careful review of the publication-ready version of your manuscript. If you miss anything here, it may be difficult to correct!
Once the manuscript has been received by the journal, it is assigned a manuscript number. The staff at the journal will check for compliance with formatting and style requirements. Meanwhile, a managing editor in the appropriate subject area performs an initial screening to decide if it is worth sending the manuscript for peer-review . During this “triage” stage, the editor may issue what is sometimes called a “desk rejection.” In brief, these rejections are due to the manuscript either being insufficiently novel, containing obvious problems with methodology or simply being off-topic for the journal.
Any required additional missing information will be solicited from the corresponding author prior to peer review. Anyone involved in peer reviewer must first accept the invitation to review your manuscript. Then, once all reviewers are in place, the manuscript is peer reviewed, which results in peer review reports that are returned to the editorial office for consideration by the Editor-in-Chief. In the end, the manuscript is accepted, rejected, or indicated to require revisions for the second round of peer-review.
After the manuscript has been accepted, several logistical steps are taken to prepare it for publication. First, in some instances, the English language in the manuscript must be improved. This may be performed using an editing service . Whether this step is completed before or after acceptance is at the discretion of reviewers and editors. Indeed, some journals will accept the manuscript and perform subsequent editing or instead require the author to complete the editing process . Then, an invoice for the publishing fees is submitted to the corresponding author, which is subsequently paid prior to journal formatting. Once paid, the journal performs typesetting and manuscript proof development, which are approved by the editorial staff and proof management staff prior to being returned to the authors for review.
Finally, the proofs are reviewed by the authors involved in the study. Any requested corrections are returned to the journal until proof approval is granted. At this stage, the manuscript will often be published online in advance and, in some cases, in print. Weeks or months later, the manuscript information is transferred to PubMed or other central repositories for indexing.
This general timeline varies by journal, the length of the peer review process, and uniqueness of each manuscript. Furthermore, various journals often have status descriptions that indicate the step that the manuscript is at during the review and publication process. Once your manuscript is submitted to a journal, it is important to keep the manuscript number handy! It will be used to track your manuscript through the peer review process and provide any other updates regarding your manuscript status.
Awesome article. Well explained. Easy to read
Your email address will not be published.
Organizing the structure of a manuscript Adding relevant references and citations Effective presentation of data…
出版までの段階と論文の下書き倫理ガイドラインと著作権侵害の回避投稿方法と要件再投稿と査読者への回答
Journal rejection is something that every researcher faces at some point in their research career.…
Publishing your manuscript in a good and impactful journal is something that every researcher aspires…
Publication Stages Manuscript Preparation Avoiding Predatory Journals Ethical Guidelines
President of the EASE, Development Editor of Reproductive BioMedicine Online Journal
Editor and Researcher at the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Chair & Professor, Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Peking University Health Science Center
September 15, 2022 · 11:30 – 12:30 UTC
Subscribe to our newsletter for regular insights from the research and publishing industry.
Copyright © 2022 – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
Enago Academy, the knowledge arm of Enago, offers comprehensive and up-to-date scholarly resources for researchers, publishers, editors, and students to learn and share their experiences about research and publishing with the academic community. Our author-focused webinars and workshops primarily cater to the needs of ESL authors, early-stage researchers, and graduate students who want to know more about the issues pertinent to successful publication. About Enago Academy
Enago Global Reach: English Editing - Enago.com | 英文校正 – Enago.jp | 论文修改 - Enago.cn | 영어논문교정 - Enago.co.kr | 英文編修 - Enago.tw | Revisão de Texto - Enago.com.br | Ingilizce Düzenleme - Enago.com.tr
Copyright © 2022 - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us
Which is the best strategy to support research integrity according to you?

Everywhere
Threads
This forum
This thread

[Grammar] After submitting the request vs After submitted the request

Thread starter
firewallengineer

Start date
Apr 2, 2012

Status

Not open for further replies.

Joined
Mar 22, 2012

Member Type

Student or Learner

Native Language

Indonesian

Home Country

Indonesia

Current Location

Indonesia

I’ve read a document and found the following sentences; “After submitting the request”.
My question is what is the difference between these two sentences? Can I use the second one?

1. After submitting the request;
2. After submitted the request;

Thanks

Joined
Mar 26, 2012

Member Type

English Teacher

Native Language

Persian

Home Country

Iran

Current Location

Iran

I've seen these structures after "after":
1. After submitting the request.
2. After the request is/was submitted.
3. After you submit/submitted the request.

Joined
Oct 14, 2010

Member Type

Native Language

British English

Home Country

Czech Republic

Current Location

Czech Republic

Can I use the second one?

1. After submitting the request;
2. After submitted the request;

Joined
Nov 13, 2002

Member Type

Native Language

British English

Home Country

UK

Current Location

Japan

You could use After having submitted the request , but the first sounds more natural to me.

Joined
Mar 22, 2012

Member Type

Student or Learner

Native Language

Indonesian

Home Country

Indonesia

Current Location

Indonesia

I've seen these structures after "after":
1. After submitting the request.
2. After the request is/was submitted.
3. After you submit/submitted the request.

Joined
Mar 26, 2012

Member Type

English Teacher

Native Language

Persian

Home Country

Iran

Current Location

Iran

Thanks moonlike, 5jj, & Tdol for your input. All these sentences are correct right?

Based on my limited knowledge in grammar, word “submitting” in the first sentence is a gerund.
For no 2, “is submitted” is a passive form of simple present.

“was submitted” is a passive form of simple past.
In the last sentences, “you submit” is simple present while “you submitted” is simple past tense.

Please let me know if my analysis is correct or not.

Reference:
ego4u.com/en/cram-up/grammar/passive
jcckc.net/english/grammar/tensetable.htm

Status

Not open for further replies.

Younger First Time Sex
Puffy Nipples Kids
Mom And Not Son Sex Wf

After Submission

Report Page