All the plenary and parallel sessions from the Oslo Redd Exchange will be presented below. Their are placed in the sameIf casual dining is your style, our kitchen tables and chairs are just the ticket. Our breakfast chairs are compact and unfussy, just what the morning rush requires! Our breakfast tables provide a handy space to grab a quick bite without dominating your kitchen. Our broad selection of traditional and contemporary kitchen tables and chairs can match quaint country kitchens or fast-dash modern lifestyles. If you like to entertain, then why not make your kitchen more sociable with our range of bar stools and bar tables. Ideal for parties or a cuppa and a catch-up, these kitchen tables and chairs are also great for snacks and breakfasts. Price (Low to High) Price (High to Low) Saving (High to Low) New Haven Pair of Rollback Chairs in Grey Fabric Find Out More » New Haven Pair of Roll Back Chairs in Oatmeal Fabric New Haven Pair of Dining Chairs in Black Faux Leather
New Haven Pair of Chairs in Grey Fabric New Haven Pair of Slatted Chairs in Brown Fabric New Haven Pair of Dining Chairs in Brown Faux Leather New Haven Pair of Slatted Chairs in Black Fabric New Haven Pair of Dining Chairs in White Faux Leather Wilkinson Furniture Pair of Louis Silver Dining Chairs Bentley Designs Montreux Soft Grey Upholstered Bonded Leather Chair Pair Wilkinson Furniture Pair of Louis Black Dining Chairs New Haven Pair of Slatted Chairs in Grey Fabric New Haven Pair of Roll Back Chairs in Slate Fabric White Flat Wishbone Chair With Wooden Legs in Beech New Haven Pair of Chairs in Slate Fabric with Black Legs New Haven Pair of Chairs in Black Faux Leather with Black Legs Rhode Island Pair of Windsor Chairs in Soft White Bentley Designs Montreux Antique White Upholstered Fabric Chair Pair New Haven Pair of Chairs in Oatmeal Fabric New Haven Pair of Chairs in Slate Fabric Seconique Julian Stacking Pair of Chairs in White and Natural
Bentley Designs Pair of Ella Oak Scoop Back Chairs in Steel LPD Monroe Pair of Diamante Dining Chairs in White New Haven Pair of Slatted Chairs in Cream Fabric Signature North Industrial Chair in Chippy White Cosmo Industrial Metal Pair of Chairs in Grey Bailey Oak Effect Dining Bench Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Plum and Walnut Bentley Designs Pair of Parker Dining Chairs in Stone and Oak Julian Bowen Astoria Dining Chair in Waxed Oak Bentley Designs Pair of Parker Dining Chairs in Charcoal and Walnut Bentley Designs Pair of Ella Oak Scoop Back Chairs in Plum Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Teal and Oak Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Red and Walnut Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Teal and Walnut Julian Bowen Coxmoor Solid Oak Dining Bench LPD Monroe Black Chairs - Set of 2 Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Plum and Oak
Bentley Designs Pair of Ella Walnut Scoop Back Chairs in Plum Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Stone and Oak Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Walnut Dining Chairs Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Linen and Walnut Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Charcoal and Walnut Bentley Designs Pair of Oslo Upholstered Dining Chairs in Red and Oak Bentley Designs Pair of Ella Walnut Scoop Back Chairs in Charcoal Bentley Designs Pair of Ella Oak Scoop Back Chairs in Teal Bentley Designs Pair of Ella Walnut Scoop Back Chairs in Red Bentley Designs Pair of Ella Walnut Scoop Back Chairs in Linen The IPCC’s priorities for the next six years: 1.5C, oceans, cities and food security The United Nations body tasked with assessing the state of the climate has been giving some serious thought to where most of its efforts should be focused in the next few years. At a in Nairobi this week, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) made a few important decisions, including what the topics for its next “special reports” should be.
Climate impacts at 1.5C, the oceans and cryosphere, and food security will all be getting special treatment in the next few years. The IPCC also confirmed today that it will be “updating” its strategy for talking to policymakers, public and the media, a recognition that it needs to be better at communicating its findings to the outside world. As in previous years, the next big IPCC report – the sixth assessment report (AR6) – will be released in three stages, the IPCC chair, , confirmed today. The three working groups – broadly covering the physical science, adaptation, and mitigation – will be published between 2020 and 2021. The synthesis report, which is meant to link all three working groups into one concise storyline, will be published in 2022. Lee told a press conference in Nairobi this morning (see video below) the timing of the synthesis report is deliberate, so that it would be “in good time” for the that nations will be undertaking in 2023, as agreed at COP21 in December.
The IPCC will also consider publishing its big reports every five years, rather than every six or seven. Youba Sokona, the IPCC vice-chair, said the panel was “very much in recognition” of the benefits of better aligning with the UNFCCC’s timeline for global stocktaking. Out of a of nearly 30 suggestions, the IPCC chose to do three special reports. The first will be on the impacts of 1.5C warming – a late addition to the list and a specific “invitation” by the UNFCCC, after language about efforts “to pursue 1.5C” made it into the final text of the . Lee told the press conference today: The question of how to limit warming to 1.5C has been gaining a lot of media attention, especially its almost guaranteed reliance on technologies. Nevertheless, the IPCC seemed reluctant this morning to speculate on what a special report on 1.5C might entail, what its main purpose will be, or how much new research will be required. All Lee would give away was that the report would be produced “as early as possible” (aiming for 2018) and that a detailed outline will be fleshed out “in the coming months”.
But scientists have certainly been spurred into action, said , co-chair of Working Group Two, telling journalists the scientific community was “already mobilising”. Indeed, an international conference at Oxford University in September will see scientists, policymakers, businesses and civil society gather to discuss the challenge of meeting the 1.5C goal, a level of ambition which the organisers say “has caught the world by surprise”. It’s worth noting, however, that by the time AR6 is published, the current pace of emissions will mean the IPCC’s carbon budget to stay below 1.5C will essentially have been exhausted, as the graphic below shows (Note: figures based on 2014 emissions). Monaco put it one of the for a special report on oceans, to “gather in a sole document all the scientific knowledge related to the role of the ocean in the climate system and climate change impacts”. Before the meeting in Nairobi, the co-chairs of each working group on each of the proposed topics for special reports, to help the panel decide which was most urgently needed.
They acknowledged that while , the and were covered in detail as separate issues in AR5, linking them more explicitly would help policymakers better understand extreme events and consequences of climate change for ecosystems. The contributions of the oceans to mitigation were also “poorly addressed” in AR5, noted the co-chairs of working group two, adding that the “magnitude of the issue and overarching implications” should make the topic a priority for a special report. There are critical thresholds in the cryosphere that could well be passed at 1.5C, says from the University of Bristol. He tells Carbon Brief: The third topic chosen for a special report combines what the co-chair of working group one, , describes as “several land surface issues”. IPCC decides to prepare 3 special reports for AR6 : 1.5°C (Paris agreement), oceans and cryosphere, and several land surface issues — Val. Masson-Delmotte (@valmasdel) April 14, 2016 In the IPCC’s words, the special report will cover “desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.”
While the five topics are interrelated, it may be a challenge to address all of them adequately in one report, says , professor of climate impacts and lead author on the food security chapter in AR5. Here, greenhouse gas “fluxes” refers to the cycling of carbon between land, plants and the atmosphere. If an element takes up more carbon than it emits, it is known as a “carbon sink” and it acts to slow the pace of warming. The reverse is called a “carbon source”. It’s likely that food security will play a key part in the special report on 1.5C, Challinor adds: The IPCC highlighted cities as another priority topic. But rather than being the focus of a whole special report, climate impacts on cities and their “unique adaptation and mitigation challenges and opportunities” looks set to be a throughout AR6. Highlighting cities in this way is “hugely important”, says , senior researcher at the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and co-ordinating lead author of the urban adaptation chapter in AR5.
The IPCC will hold a special conference on cities to better get to grips with the issue, Lee told today’s press conference. He also indicated that cities will be a special report for the AR7 cycle and that the IPCC will be updating the methodology for how countries report their greenhouse gas inventories, to be published in 2019. How to better communicate its findings to the outside world is a “very important” element of the IPCC’s work, Lee told the press conference this morning. From now on, the IPCC will involve communications specialists from the start in a bid to improve the readability of the reports, especially the “summary for policymakers”, he said. This resolution stems from a in Oslo in February on how the IPCC could make its findings clearer and more engaging for policymakers, the public and the media. Other interesting outcomes from the meeting included the to publish the early drafts of the assessment reports when they are in review. (Previously, they have been available only to “expert reviewers” but tend to have to the press anyway.)
There was also the suggestion for a page limit on the Summary for Policymaker’s and a gentle reminder that they need only focus on policy-relevant bits, not be a comprehensive summary of each chapter. The from the meeting also recognised that “the media landscape is changing rapidly” and contained the intriguing recommendation that the IPCC should “be nimble and responsive so that it uses the best technology when future reports appear”. Plans to hold a on the “science of science communication” is an opportunity for the IPCC to see how lessons from the psychology and social science literature can help with the challenges it faces, says , research director at . More details on how the IPCC intends to approach communications in the future will come when it submits its “updated” communications strategy at the next big meeting in December. In the meantime, it does at least look hopeful that the IPCC will have the cash for some such activities. The IPCC’s for 2016 allocates just under £200,000 in 2016 for the continued communication of AR5, and a proposal for the same amount in 2017, 2018 and 2019.