the Neo Atheists

'The four horsemen of the Apocalypse' are the atheists version of the gospel. These are the people who deny the existence of God and the afterlife. They are Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens. These four men are some of the most vocal and visible atheists in the world.

The arguments against the New Atheists are many. First, they tend to be very reductionist in their thinking. They try to explain away everything in terms of natural causes, without any room for the supernatural. This is a major problem, since it means that they can never really be sure about anything.

Second, they are often very dogmatic in their views. They tend to think that they are right and everyone else is wrong. This is a dangerous attitude, because it can lead to intolerance and bigotry.

Third, the New Atheists often rely on false information and strawman arguments. For example, they often claim that all religions are violent, when in reality, only a small minority of religious people are violent. This is a serious problem, because it means that they are not really engage in honest debate.

Fourth, the New Atheists tend to be very dismissive of religion. They often act like religion is something that is silly and superstitious. This is not only arrogant, but it is also very offensive to religious people.

Overall, the arguments against the New Atheists are quite strong. They are often reductionist, dogmatic, and relying on false information. Additionally, they are often quite dismissive of religion. These are all serious problems that should be considered when evaluating their claims.

The New Atheists (often referred to as the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse”) are a group of atheists who aggressively promote their views and attack religious beliefs. The members of this group are Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens.

The New Atheists have been criticized for their aggressive and sometimes intolerant attitude towards religion. They have been accused of being closed-minded and of only considering arguments that support their own views. Additionally, some of their claims have been criticized as being based on misinformation or misunderstanding of religious beliefs.

Critics also argue that the New Atheists are not really interested in an honest debate about religion; instead, they are trying to force their own views on others. This is seen as a form of “intellectual bullying” and is counterproductive to real dialogue and understanding.

Sources:

1. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/01/06/new-atheists-dont-represent-all-of-us-heres-why/

2. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-light/atheism-and-intolerance_b_787550.html

3. http://www.reasons.org/articles/the-four-horsemen-of-the-new-atheism