Our LeadFreeNYC: Drinking Fountains - NYC Parks Ideas

"We must not pull back from this nationwide leadership when attending to other PFAS."< Legislating vs. managing The expense passed in June does not regulate the 23 emerging impurities as strictly as the state currently regulates PFOA and PFOS. For those 2, water providers that go beyond the 10 ppt maximum contamination limit must formally notify their customers and remediate the issue.

Skoufis said he would have chosen to require the health department to set levels of contamination for the 23 contaminants at which it would need remediation. But he feared that would have jeopardized the expense's chances of winning assistance. Instead, he hopes notice will push the public to demand remediation from regional authorities.

Peggy Kurtz, of the Rockland Water Coalition, stated her group was "baffled" by the notice Suez Water New York sent out to Rockland water consumers in November 2020, after tests showed PFOA concentrations of 19 ppt, almost double the 10 ppt threshold needing removal. "Consuming drinking water with PFOA at or rather above the maximum contamination limit does not posture a considerable health threat," the business's needed notification informed consumers.

The notification didn't discuss that seven other PFAS chemicals were likewise found in Rockland's water. In a statement reacting to questions for this article, the department validated that the language in Suez's reaction "follows our templates." The statement discussed that it thought about water at the levels detected in Rockland County, despite the fact that it needed remediation, safe to consume: "Maximum pollutant levels or drinking water requirements are set far below levels that trigger health results.

This is why with the exception of pollutants like germs, the water might be appropriate to utilize while actions are being taken by the water provider to decrease levels." In Manhattan drinking water testing , the EPA set nonenforceable drinking water advisories of 70 ppt for PFOA and PFOS combined, limits well over the levels discovered in Rockland.

In November, the EPA acknowledged that its existing limits might be expensive, noting "current scientific data and brand-new analyses that show that negative health results might happen at much lower levels of exposure to PFOA and PFOS than formerly understood and that PFOA is a likely carcinogen." The company guaranteed to update its health advisories and enforceable guidelines for PFAS later on this year.