file down site
what's webhard?
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.
You need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you have to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.
Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)
p2p 순위 Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself can't be documented.
There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.