Youre A Fucking White Male

Youre A Fucking White Male
What's up with YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE?
A subreddit to help you keep up to date with what's going on with reddit and other stuff.
I've been seeing it pop up in threads all over Reddit and I know it's got something to do with SJWs, but where did it start?
It's actually "YOU'RE FUCKING A WHITE MALE!". It happens around 11:12.
Well that was all pretty cancerous, but are we really standing up for Trump? I mean, really? It was funny at first, Trump runs for POTUS! Nobody but simple, short-sighted extreme right-wingers actually think that cartoon character should be President, right? I roll my eyes at the unreasonably offended as much as the next guy, but this anti-SJW pushback is getting scarily overzealous.
Search "Aids Skrillex" and look at the Know Your Meme page. It's essentially a guy at a Trump rally, who looks as if Skrillex had aids, gets upset and starts screaming "YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE!" at people
To which I respond "Yeah, and?" Seriously, why do these people think facts can be used as insults?

White SJW hag: “You’re a fucking White man. Your privilege is not welcome here!”
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HK1hFUD_d4

The level of racial self-hatred by this White woman is typical of the SJW
(Social-Justice-Warrior) types who imagine it’s virtuous to call for the
genocide of one’s own race. The Mexican gal interviewed at the start of the
video is proud of her Hispanic identity and of the Mexican flag which is the
complete opposite of the hideous-looking White woman.

Aside from her self-destructive Libtard views, it’s apparent that this gal
has just given up on her looks. She no longer cares. I doubt she’s
encountered a brush or a toothbrush in the past 10 years and, let’s be
honest here, what man in his right man would want her?

I can almost guarantee she doesn’t have a man in her life, but I bet she has
lots of cats.

You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message

--------------
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2016/0322/Tapping-into-anxieties-of-white-America-Donald-Trump-isn-t-the-first

*Tapping into Anxieties of White America? Donald Trump Isn't the First.*

Violent altercations at political rallies have emerged at various times in US history - sometimes in stronger form than in 2016.
by Peter Grier, ataff writer
March 22, 2016

Washington -- The presidential hopeful knew many American voters were angry. Some of his rivals preached calm. He didn't.

"We need some meanness," he said at one point on the campaign trail.

Confrontation at his rallies became a ritual. He spoke, the hecklers started, and he shouted back. Fistfights broke out in the aisles. Scores of police were necessary to restore order.

One Midwestern rally decayed into a chair-swinging melee. Bodyguards hustled the candidate off stage. As handcuffed protesters shuffled towards the exits, supporters sucker-punched them. Law enforcement did not intervene.

Donald Trump, 2016? Nope. George Wallace, 1968.

"One plainclothes policeman, using a pair of handcuffs as brass knuckles, cut the face of a heckler who shoved him," said the Chicago Tribune in its account of the wild Wallace rally in Detroit on Oct. 29 of that year.

Rabble-rousing has a long and complex history in United States politics. From the Know Nothing Party of the 1840s, through Ku Klux Klan violence in Reconstruction and into the tense era of Vietnam, ambitious politicians have at times directly appealed to the anxieties of a mainly white working class that the world they know is threatened, and is slipping from their grasp.

These appeals take many forms. Sometimes they're about economic populism. Sometimes they're about the perceived depredations of immigrants. Sometimes they're racist. Always there's a whiff - and sometimes more than that - of violent resistance.

What's Trump's place in this continuum? That's hard to say just yet. To this point he's no George Wallace. This year isn't anything like the late 1960s, when US politics and society itself seemed at the point of becoming unhinged.

But like Wallace, Trump blames his supporters' outbursts on the other side. It's not our fault, it's them. You know, the others. The ones not like us.

"I get these massive crowds of people, and we'll get protesters. And these protesters are honestly, they're very bad people. In many cases, they're professionals. Highly trained professionals," Trump told the Washington Post editorial board during a meeting on March 21.

Trump tells supporters that their jobs have been stolen by illegal immigrants and stupid trade deals, and he'll get them back. Under President Trump, we'll wall ourselves off from the immigrants, beat China on trade, take the oil from Iraq we deserve, and force freeloading allies to pay for our protection.

If this is populism, it's an aggressive strain. Left-leaning historian Rick Perlstein calls Trump's general appeal "herrenvolk democracy." It's not conservatism at all. It's big government, and big government programs, but only for the deserving.

"'Herrenvolk' was a word coined by a sociologist in 1967 that basically means social democracy for the favored race as a way not of expanding liberty to the entire citizenry but drawing a line between the accepted in-group and the hated out-group," Perlstein told an interviewer for Slate earlier this year.

"Herrenvolk democracy"? The name may be new, but the ideas it expresses are not. In the pre-Civil War era, the Know Nothings were all that, and more. Much more.

They arose in reaction to immigration. The immigrants were Irish and German Catholics, though, not Hispanics from across the southern border.

Protestant Americans were worried this new class of workers would take their jobs. They organized politically under the banner of the American Republican Party, and various other names. "Know Nothing" was a nickname for these organizations, and it stuck.

As Catholics poured into the country into the 1850s, crime and welfare costs soared, particularly in the northeast. Know Nothing candidates swept elections in Massachusetts and made inroads in some other nearby states. They pushed populist economic policies, such as railroad regulations and expanded access to public education. They also rallied to restrict Catholic rights, though they failed in an attempt to get Congress to lengthen the period for naturalization from five to 21 years.

Voting was a particular flash point. On Election Day in 1855 riots broke out between Know Nothing mobs and Catholic groups in Louisville, Kentucky. At least 22 people died.

"Violence became so great that many writers, both then and now, have designated this day 'Bloody Monday'," wrote Charles Deusner in an account of the incident in a Kentucky Historical Society journal in 1963.

Like US society of the time, the Know Nothings were split by the slavery question. They rapidly declined in influence in the late 1850s, and were spent as a US political force by the 1860 election.

Emancipation produced the next upsurge of US political violence. And make no mistake: the Reconstruction era, in the South, was violent in the extreme. Following the Civil War, the rise of state governments controlled by newly freed African-Americans and Unionist Republicans was an affront the old planter aristocracy could little abide. So they didn't.

Starting in about 1868 a wave of counterrevolutionary terror swept the region, led by the Ku Klux Klan. The Klan was in essence the military force of the planters, the Democratic party, and all others who wanted white supremacy restored, writes Columbia historian Eric Foner in his classic "Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution". It burned and murdered with impunity, making it virtually impossible for Republicans, the party of Lincoln, to campaign or vote in many parts of the Deep South.

"The Klan devastated the Republican organization in many local communities," Foner writes.

State by state, Democrats and the old regimes returned to power. They put in place segregated public facilities and barriers to African-American voting, laying the foundation for Jim Crow laws and decades of oppression. They bottled up the aspirations of a race - leading, in turn, to the explosion of the civil rights movement of the late 20th century, as that race, down so long, sought its freedoms denied.

And that brings us to 1968. Today's US politics may seem dark, threatening, and polarized. But it was worse then, in the late '60s. Casualties mounted in Vietnam as protests against the war split the country. Race riots erupted from Watts to Detroit. To the voters of what Richard Nixon labeled the "silent majority", the nation seemed to be coming apart. By year's end, Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert Kennedy would be gone, felled by assassins.

Alabama Gov. George Wallace, avowed segregationist, colorful populist, and presidential aspirant, appealed to those workers' fears. He threatened to shoot rioters and run his limousine over anti-war protestors. He opined that the racial unrest ripping around the US was "planned in Havana".

In one 1967 speech Wallace said that the working people of America were fed up with Washington bureaucrats, pointy-headed professors, and "swaydo" (his pronunciation of "pseudo") intellectual morons telling them how to live their lives.

"Then he left under armed guard, a sweaty savor of imminent violence hanging in the air," wrote Rick Perlstein in "Nixonland", his history of the era.

And his supporters were violent. The Oct. 29 riot at his Detroit rally at Cobo Hall was but the culmination. An earlier rally at Madison Square Garden in New York was kept under control only by the presence of 1,000 policemen.

Today's Trump rallies are only a pale echo of that, at least so far. But the real estate magnate has also expressed some nostalgia for the "old days".

"We're not allowed to punch back anymore. I love the old days. You know what they used to do to [protesters] in a place like this? They would be carried out in a stretcher, folks. True," Trump said at a Las Vegas rally in February.
--------------

1968: George Wallace and his supporters.

2016: Donald Trump and his supporters.

48 years apart, yet both waving the same banner of BIGOTRY & HATRED.

In the very end, they *always* loose.

. . .

Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
On 3/24/2016 10:37 AM, Ted&Alice wrote:
> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 8:06:35 AM UTC, None of the Above wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:02:17 -0500, "Byker" wrote:
>>>
>>> Aside from her self-destructive Libtard views, it's apparent that this gal
>>> has just given up on her looks. She no longer cares. I doubt she's
>>> encountered a brush or a toothbrush in the past 10 years and, let's be
>>> honest here, what man in his right man would want her?
>>>
>>> I can almost guarantee she doesn't have a man in her life, but I bet she has
>>> lots of cats.
>>
>> Thanks for the link; I saw this on the tube the other day and wanted a
>> copy for my "Lucking Fiberals" archive.
>>
>> "Douchebag" doesn't even begin to describe this Social Justice
>> Whorrior...
>>
>> ...and quit picking on cats!
>
> It's obvious where she's coming from. She's had such bad luck with guys,
> that she's come to despise them. Possibly she was even able to find a
> black guy who would accept her repulsive looks and demeanor

Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
>
> Possibly she was even able to find a black guy who would accept her
> repulsive looks and demeanor.

You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 3:39:59 PM UTC, someone else wrote:
> On 3/24/2016 10:37 AM, Ted&Alice wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 8:06:35 AM UTC, None of the Above wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:02:17 -0500, "Byker" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Aside from her self-destructive Libtard views, it's apparent that this gal
> >>> has just given up on her looks. She no longer cares. I doubt she's
> >>> encountered a brush or a toothbrush in the past 10 years and, let's be
> >>> honest here, what man in his right man would want her?
> >>>
> >>> I can almost guarantee she doesn't have a man in her life, but I bet she has
> >>> lots of cats.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the link; I saw this on the tube the other day and wanted a
> >> copy for my "Lucking Fiberals" archive.
> >>
> >> "Douchebag" doesn't even begin to describe this Social Justice
> >> Whorrior...
> >>
> >> ...and quit picking on cats!
> >
> > It's obvious where she's coming from. She's had such bad luck with guys,
> > that she's come to despise them. Possibly she was even able to find a
> > black guy who would accept her repulsive looks and demeanor
>
>
> Someone else might get the impression that you are a racist right winger
>
>

You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message

On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:02:17 -0500, "Byker" wrote:

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HK1hFUD_d4
>
>The level of racial self-hatred by this White woman is typical of the SJW
>(Social-Justice-Warrior) types who imagine it’s virtuous to call for the
>genocide of one’s own race. The Mexican gal interviewed at the start of the
>video is proud of her Hispanic identity and of the Mexican flag which is
>the
>complete opposite of the hideous-looking White woman.
>
>Aside from her self-destructive Libtard views, it’s apparent that this gal
>has just given up on her looks. She no longer cares. I doubt she’s
>encountered a brush or a toothbrush in the past 10 years and, let’s be
>honest here, what man in his right man would want her?
>
>I can almost guarantee she doesn’t have a man in her life, but I bet she
>has
>lots of cats.

Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
>
> "Diversity" is one of the worst things that could happen to the US. 'In
> the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in
> good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be
> treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to
> discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or
> origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet
> an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided
> allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else
> also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the
> American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the
> English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a
> loyalty to the American people.'

You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message

"Wayne" wrote in message news:nd15c1$gep$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> "Diversity" is one of the worst things that could happen to the US. 'In
> the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in
> good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be
> treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to
> discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or
> origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet
> an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided
> allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else
> also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the
> American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the
> English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a
> loyalty to the American people.'

Moslems. Germans and Moslems. Fill in the blank and Moslems.

Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message

"Youre a fucking white male!" guy now host of Infowars broadcast
Heather Hayer = fat ugly childless cunt
Where Democracy fails, helicopters shall succeed.
Welcome to /r/Anarcho_Capitalism, a place to discuss free market capitalist anarchism and related topics, and share things that would be of interest to Anarcho-Capitalists.
He's moving up in the world! Good for him.
Who cares? It's Info Wars... It's to be expected.
No, AIDS Skrillex was the guy yelling at the guy in OPs video, along with Carl the Cuck.

Was this page helpful?

Jillian Janson Pics
Hot Pictures, Xxx Images
Grinding Gif

Youre A Fucking White Male

Report Page