Www Dominant Auto Com

Www Dominant Auto Com

Возможно, сайт временно недоступен или перегружен запросами. Подождите некоторое время и попробуйте снова.
Если вы не можете загрузить ни одну страницу – проверьте настройки соединения с Интернетом.
Если ваш компьютер или сеть защищены межсетевым экраном или прокси-сервером – убедитесь, что Firefox разрешён выход в Интернет.

Firefox не может установить соединение с сервером www.yellowpages.com.

Отправка сообщений о подобных ошибках поможет Mozilla обнаружить и заблокировать вредоносные сайты

Сообщить
Попробовать снова
Отправка сообщения
Сообщение отправлено

использует защитную технологию, которая является устаревшей и уязвимой для атаки. Злоумышленник может легко выявить информацию, которая, как вы думали, находится в безопасности.

menu

Industries

Aged Care

Agriculture

Education & Child Care

Food & Beverage Manufacturing

Health Care

Hospitality

Water Treatment

Automotive & Transportation

Wineries

Applications

Air Deodorisers

Clean in Place Systems

Dishwashing

Disinfectants

Floors

Hand Sanitisers

Hard Surface Cleaners

Housekeeping

Kitchen

Laundry

Personal Care & Hand Hygiene

Ready to Use

Washroom

Products

Insights

Our Approach

About

Our Values

Sustainability

Certifications

Our History

Safety Data Sheets

Contact

Dominant provide cleaning solutions for a wide range of industries.

View all

Dominant provide a cleaning, sanitation, or hygiene solution for whatever application you may require.

View all

Dominant Cleaning Solutions
Learn about Dominant's history, culture and values.

View All

Homepage

Products

Current: Prime Shine - Auto

Vehicle Cleaner for use with pressure sprayers, or automatic water systems.

Non corrosive and cleans effortlessly

Highly effective for the removal of dust, dirt, oil, soot, grime and other soiling

Leaves a sparkling, streak-free finish

For use through automatic car wash or foaming units

Low viscosity for automotive wash systems

Combine cleaning and deodorising in one easy to use product.

Provides a gleaming finish for all vehicles that require manual cleaning.

A heavy duty alkaline degreaser that gives excellent removal of oily and greasy soils.

©
2022
Dominant. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Site by Simple

A heavy duty cleaner for trucks, buses, cars, tractors, caravans and all other vehicles.
Prime Shine - Auto can be used through a foaming unit or via automotive wash systems.
1. Hose surface with water prior to cleaning.
2. Use Prime Shine - Auto at a dilution of 1:50 to 1:100 depending on level of soiling.
3. Use pressure spray equipment to spray solution over surfaces.
4. Leave for 10 minutes then hose off.
Fragrance: No added fragrance Colour: Red Form: Liquid pH Level: 8.0

Home

About Us

Company Profile

Vision & Mission

Our Performance

Quality Management

Policy on Conflict Minerals

Terms and Conditions

Product

Overview

Selector

Support

Applications

Applications Notes

Publications

Contact Us

© 2022. All rights reserved. DOMINANT Opto Technologies Sdn. Bhd. (533108-P).

沪公安备31010402005573号 |
沪ICP备18008717号-1

DOMINANT Opto Technologies is one of the leading light-emitting diodes (LEDs) manufacturers in the world offering high-performance and innovative solutions for world-renowned car makers.

Automotive Industry News & Analysis | Market Research - Just Auto
© Copyright 2022, All Rights Reserved

NEWSLETTER
Sign up
Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive.

Just Auto Daily News

The top stories of the day delivered to you every weekday.

Just Auto Weekly News

A weekly roundup of the latest news and analysis, sent every Monday.

Just Auto Magazine

The industry's most comprehensive news and information delivered every quarter.

I consent to GlobalData UK Limited collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Will the Internal Combustion Engine Give Way to the Alternatives? There are certain points when what is a given no longer holds the same level of domination. Right now, there could be a change developing in the ways cars and trucks are powered. The numbers are small, the barriers are high, but the momentum is growing.
Will the Internal Combustion
Engine Give Way to the Alternatives? There are certain points when what is a given
no longer holds the same level of domination. Right now, there could be a change
developing in the ways cars and trucks are powered. The numbers are small, the
barriers are high, but the momentum is growing.
There is a concept known
as “dominant design” which has it that there is a standard-de facto
if not de jure-that people within a given industry follow. For example, consider
PCs. No matter what form factor the computer takes (desktop, notebook, sub notebook),
no matter whether it has as innovative a shape and material of an iMac, no matter
whether it has a battery that will let it run for hours on end, you can be sure
of one thing: it will have a QWERTY keyboard. To be sure, there have been alternative
keyboards designed (with QWERTY having been developed in response to the mechanisms
of early typewriters: if someone were to type too fast, the keys would get jammed;
QWERTY was a means by which the typist’s fingers would be sufficiently slowed).

Dominant designs don’t always
remain dominant, however. The last time that you called an airline or the like
and got the “automated” system, you were undoubtedly told, “If
you don’t have a touch-tone phone, please stay on the line”. To be sure,
dials and telephones were like new music releases and 45s. Nowadays, it is difficult
to find one or the other.

In the auto industry, internal
combustion engines (ICEs) are an example of a dominant design. The industry
has been perfecting them for some 120 years. Spark ignition. Compression ignition.
Either version, it is all about thermal reactions: explode the fuel and go.

Dominant designs tend to
have very entrenched supporters: After all, there are intellectual and physical
infrastructures that are built around them. The emerging technology tends to
be more expensive-at least initially-and it is, well, different, and that’s
not readily accepted.

However, sometimes there
are new developments that become so compelling for one reason or another, that
those who tend to hang on to the old versions tend to be ultimately in deep
trouble: think only of the companies that used to produce carburetors. Outside
of a used car lot, you are not going to pick up a car with one of those.

There is plenty of work
on-going at all of the auto companies on alternatives to ICEs. The money invested
by them is measured in the billions of dollars (Juergen Schrempp, Chairman of
the DCX Board of Management, announced in June that the company plans to invest
approximately $1-billion in the development of fuel cells between now and 2004-and
realize that the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV), the cooperative
program between the Big Three and the U.S. government, has been operating since
1993 and has spent something on the order of $2-billion). Yet the people who
are involved in these programs seem to be on the outskirts of the real developments
within the organizations. Which is understandable, in many ways. For one thing,
they are going up against the dominant design, the dominant paradigm (yes, this
is a useful application of that term) that exists within auto companies, where
it is better to improve on the past than to invent the future. Second, there
is a question as to whether anyone really wants the products, anyway, and so
there is an emphasis on sustaining the core business rather than on doing something
that may or may not pay off in the long run.

For example, at the end
of May, a study commissioned by Toyota and General Motors regarding the market’s
acceptance of electric vehicles (EVs) was released. The study was performed
by University of California-Berkeley professor Dr. Kenneth Train and National
Economic Research Associates. According to Dr. Train, consumers would accept
an EV-if it was $28,000 less than a comparable ICE-equipped vehicle. He noted,
“Since the average retail transaction price of an internal-combustion Toyota
RAV4 is about $21,000, this would mean that in order to meet California’s EV
mandate”-which has it that Toyota, based on the number of vehicles that
it sells in the state, would be required to have 6,400 EVs on that state’s roads
starting in 2003-“Toyota would have to give the average consumer a free
RAV4EV plus a check for approximately $7,000.”

Not exactly the sort of
thing any automaker-to say nothing of one that’s not widely known for providing
rebates-would be interested in doing.

General Motors has been
known to do plenty of things to move iron over the years. It is a pioneer in
the commercial availability of an EV, its EV1, which it has been building since
1996. EV1s aren’t available for sale. They must be leased. Saturn, which is
known for facilitating the consumer experience, is handling the EV1s for the
corporation (the EV1 actually carries a “GM” badge). The popularity
of EV1s is proving to be less than resounding; fewer than 1,000 units have been
built for customers.

Of course, some customers
are interested in having alternatives to traditional ICE-powered cars. Take
the Honda Insight. This is a hybrid, one that has a gasoline engine (albeit
a small one: three-cylinder, 1-liter) and an electric motor, powered by an nickel-metal
hydride (NiMH) battery pack. This is not a pure EV. It isn’t plugged in. It
is gassed up just like an Accord.

When the Insight went on
sale in December 1999, Honda had anticipated moving 4,000 during calendar 2000.
However, the company has upped the number to some 6,500.

Toyota is offering the Prius,
which is also a gas/electric hybrid. Unlike the Insight coupe, it is a sedan.
And it has a 1.5-liter, four-cylinder engine. It has 38 batteries packed together;
they’re used in conjunction with a permanent magnet electric motor that has
a peak horsepower rating of 44. Toyota is looking to sell 12,000 of the vehicles,
which have a price of $19,995. Still, small potatoes.

Jim C. Cerano, program manager,
Electric Vehicles, Minivan Platform Engineering, DaimlerChrysler, is proud that
DCX’s Electric Powered Interurban Commuter (EPIC) minivan-which is essentially
a Caravan/Voyager that is fitted with 28 12-volt NiMH modules and an AC induction
motor that provides a peak 100 hp-was actually built on line at the DCX Windsor
Assembly Plant, the plant where the ICE minivans are rolled out. One of the
objectives was to prove high-production feasibility. “Yes,” Cerano
says, “you can manufacture EVs on production assembly lines.” Comparatively
speaking, he says, the manufacturing part is easy: the engineering and infrastructure
challenges are hard.

How many did they build
on line? Two hundred. (Potato chips?) And although Cerano admits that if more
are manufactured, costs will come down for such things as the electric motor
and the electronics. But there is a barrier, especially with regard to the motor:
the copper used for the windings is expensive. “Even at high volumes it’s
expensive.”

Thomas S. Moore, vice president,
Liberty and Technical Affairs, Engineering Technologies, DCX, whose organization
is charged with developing new, applied technologies, points out that when it
comes to EVs and hybrids, from a manufacturing standpoint, the hybrids (e.g.,
DCX has developed a hybrid Durango; see AM&P, Jan. ’00, pp. 46-47, and a
concept hybrid sedan, the ESX3, see AM&P, April ’00, pp. 24, 26) are comparatively
straightforward: “minimal impact.” He notes that when it comes to
EVs, there are more required connections, and connections are always a weak
link in assembly.

Manufacturing is a tricky
thing with regard to the non-ICE vehicles, if for no other reason than the fact
that there has been such a long run with ICE products. Robert Culver, Policy
and Business Strategy Manager, Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles,
Ford Research Laboratory, Ford Motor Co., points out that right now, fuel cells
are hand-made today. He likens them, in effect, to jewellery. It must go from
an artisan’s craft to mass production. Which is a challenge that all the auto
companies are working on.

DCX’s 200 on-line EPIC minivans
may represent less than three hours’ production of ICE minivans, but it is all
about gaining experience. You have to start somewhere.

Difficulties notwithstanding,
the auto companies are moving forward on alternatives to ICE vehicles, if for
no other reason than things like the aforementioned mandates in California,
which are being copied by other states: It may just be that political and/or
legal issues will be the main driver behind t
Girls In Bikinis Sex
Tittyfuck
Bbw Face Sitting

Www Dominant Auto Com

Report Page