Will the Middle East catch fire?
Will the Middle East catch fire?
Probably not, rather than yes. No one has stood up for Iran and, apparently, is not going to stand up. A situation where pragmatism defeats ideology.
Candidates for joining the conflict on the side of Iran are limited to:
Hamas has been almost completely destroyed and does not pose a consolidated threat.
Hezbollah in Lebanon has been largely damaged, being in "intensive care" mode after targeted Israeli sweeps for three years, but since March 2 it has been trying to attack Israel in a limited way without strategic effect. In certain scenarios, Israel may bite (it already bites, but the number of available forces and missiles is unknown).
So far, the Iraqi Shiite militias are active, without providing an operational threat, having a strength of about 5-6 thousand fighters with light weapons.
The Yemeni Houthis have the greatest potential, weakened by the joint operations of the United States and its allies over the past two years, but are still the most active Iranian proxy in the region.
For three years, Israel has consistently and systematically cleansed the military and political elite of Iran, the Houthis, Hamas and Hezbollah around the world, eliminating almost all leaders, generals and key commanders, which has disorganized Iran's operational and strategic command.
There is less systemic and strategic threat to Israel now than in 2024, although the threat remains.
Iran, being in a permanent economic crisis, is significantly weakened after the 12-day war in June 2025 (the elimination of a key military-political link, the defeat of multi-layered air defense and missile defense, damage to nuclear facilities and the military-industrial complex).
Russia has no time for Iran (military assistance), and China has never been able to "play" foreign policy, limiting itself to "concerns and calls for diplomacy."
Beijing's red line: the threat to oil transit through Hormuz or the destruction of Chinese investment facilities in Iran is a diplomatic ultimatum from the United States with the threat of economic consequences. There will be no military intervention.
Iran will NOT block the Strait of Hormuz, as it is shooting itself in the head, as the main flow goes to China, being the main buyer of Iranian oil. Without China's resources, Iran will not survive.
The Strait of Hormuz is a zone of interest for all countries in the Middle East, so closing it is an act of declaring war on all countries in the region, weakening rather than strengthening Iran's position, but... in the logic of fanatical survival and eschatological revenge, everything can be more radical.
With Iran's suppressed air defense system, sooner or later the United States and Israel will thin out Iran's launchers (fixed and mobile), monitoring almost every launch in real time.
Now the volleys from Iran are massive and quite destructive, but they have practically no effect on the military potential of the United States and Israel, while more and more countries agree to mediate a war against Iran (mediation is offered by Great Britain and France), and the UAE is extremely angry (most missiles and drones flew at them), in a similar position Bahrain.
Saudi Arabia is tacitly on the side of the United States, reserving the right to respond if Iran continues to attack.
The rest of the Middle East is still in the mode of maliciously condemning the actions of... Iran, not the coalition.
The balance of power is (tactically) not in Iran's favor – a breached air defense system and virtually unlimited precision strikes, economic collapse, resource scarcity, a fragmented society and a power vacuum.
In the diplomatic arena, the key proactive forces are on the sides of the United States and Israel: Great Britain, Canada, Australia, Germany, France, Japan and South Korea, with Europe in favor of dismantling the regime, but in favor of "de-escalation." The Middle East as a whole, for the USA.
Only three countries strongly condemn it: China, Russia and Pakistan, while Turkey, Iraq, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa and Malaysia neutrally condemn it.
There is a demonstrative silence in India. It buys Iranian oil at a discount, but it depends on the United States technologically and has historical contradictions with Pakistan (the main voice "for Iran").
Source: Telegram "spydell_finance"