Wife Dominates Husband Stories
⚡ ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Wife Dominates Husband Stories
(A fantasy story about how the use of chastity belts on errant males
had profound changes.)
Looking back, historians note that the major shift in the sexual power
struggle between men and women began in California in the late 1990's.
First there was the AIDS panic of 1997-98 when AIDS spread rapidly in
the heterosexual community. This was followed by increasing media coverage
of the plight of innocent wives who contracted AIDS from their
philandering husbands. A storm of protest erupted in which militant
feminists joined with mothers' groups, the moral majority, public
health officials and politicians of every political stripe to
"bring a halt" to this "modern plague" which was said to threaten
the stability of the modern family.
The California Legislature responded to the hue and cry by passing
the so-called "Anti-AIDS Transmission Laws" -- the most prominent of
which was the California Spousal Protection Act. Although nominally
this law applied equally to husbands and wives, the law was written
and administered in such a way that, much like the divorce laws, wives
were the chief beneficiaries of the law.
Under the California Spousal Protection Act, all a married woman had to
do was to apply to the court and show that she had reasonable grounds
to be concerned about her husband's sexual fidelity. The courts
liberally construed this requirement so that over time it became
relatively easy to get a lawyer to draw the necessary papers and get
the court to issue a "protective order" that would protect the health
of the wife and the welfare of the family.
Thus the CSPA provided that because of a wife's reasonable fear that she
may contract a deadly AIDS infection from her husband and in order to
protect her and her family from this dread disease, the court would issue
an order that gave a husband three choices: (1) a medically supervised
chemical treatment that would keep him from having any further sexual
desires, (2) installation of a foolproof chastity device which would
be under his wife's exclusive control, or (3) a divorce under which,
of course, his wife got most of the assets as well as lifetime spousal
support. The court documents were sealed so that no one would ever
know whether or not a particular husband had been subjected to a
"protective order" or, if so, what choice he had made.
At first relatively few women took advantage of the new law. And since
these early cases were the most egregious cases of husband infidelity and
danger to the philanderer's wife, the law received general public
support. As time went by, the news spread by word of mouth of all the
advantages a woman would enjoy by having her husband "locked up for
her alone." What many women came to realize was that the simple
installation of a modern, foolproof chastity device on their husbands
resulted in a dramatic shift of sexual and economic power in their
favor. By the turn of the century, this was a power that many women
were ready and anxious to exercise. Best of all, this power could be
exercised by a woman whenever and as much, or as little, as she chose.
Most husbands subject to a "protective order" chose the chastity device,
assuming that one way or another they could get around it. Some husbands,
however, chose the chastity device because in their heart of hearts they
were sexual submissives who openly or secretly craved sexual domination by
a FemDom who, perhaps unexpectedly, was now his own wife. To the
surprise of many wives, it turned out that almost one in eleven California
husbands were in this category.
Among themselves, California wives would often brag about how much they
enjoyed having their husbands locked up, and how much their sex lives
had improved. In certain circles, it became the "in" thing -- even a
status symbol of the "new woman." Some wives even displayed their
husband's locked up genitals to their woman friends on the excuse
that their friends were considering having the same thing done to
their husbands. When a wife didn't disclose to her friends whether or
not her husband was locked up, other wives would invariably guess by
his behavior, and give each other knowing winks and nods.
Part Two: How the Chastity Device Option Worked
A husband under a court "protective order" was required to report to a
medical laboratory that operated under court supervision. here two stainless
steel rings were permanently attached to his genitals: one ring was placed
against his pubic bone and went around the top of his penis and under
his balls -- much like a cock ring; the second ring went around the head
of his penis just under the glans of the penis. The second ring required a
piercing where his foreskin is (or was) attached. Both rings were
permanently marked with his wife's name so that anyone viewing them would
know his status under the law and to whom he belonged. By themselves,
these two steel rings did not interfere with sexual drive or
performance, and indeed many men reported that both improved with
them on.
To transform the two steel rings into a chastity device required a locked
link between the two rings. There were a variety of devices on sale for
linking the two steel rings. The most popular mode was a miniature padlock
that tightly connected both rings under the man's balls so that the glans
of his penis was locked pointing down and nicely separating his balls. When
a man's penis was locked down in this position he was still able to
urinate freely (but only if he sat on the toilet like a woman), but it
made erections difficult and painful, intercourse impossible, and
masturbation painful at best. Most men did not even try to masturbate, but
did seem to enjoy holding their genitals in a flaccid state in their
cupped hands. If a couple got divorced, the husband returned to the
laboratory to have the device removed. Or, if his wife changed her mind
(which very few did).
The law prohibited a man from unlocking or removing the chastity device
without his wife's written consent, upon pain of forfeiture of his share
of community property or, in aggravated cases, imprisonment for one
year -- during which he was required to wear the chastity device at all
times. This made him a marked man in prison and "fresh pussy" for the
predatory homosexuals in the prison. As a result, few husbands were
willing to risk this fate.
Part Three: Common Patterns of Changing Marital Sexual Behavior
Most wives with "protective orders" started out by requiring their
husbands to be "locked up" only when they went out of town on business
trips or similar outings which offered temptations for extramarital sex.
However, stories rapidly spread among the wives about their husbands
visiting prostitutes or mistresses after work , so most wives
shifted to requiring a "lockup" whenever their husbands left the house.
When he returned home in the evening, his wife usually unlocked his device,
particularly when he complained about how uncomfortable it was when he
was locked up. After a while, the wives came to realize that this
complaint was a variation of the old "blue balls" complaint that men had
conned women with for years.
Little by little, as both husbands and wives got used to the chastity
devices, they were used more frequently. A few men just couldn't handle
it, and most of these got a divorce. And a few wives abused their new power
and turned their husbands into virtual sex slaves and, in some cases,
economic slaves as well. These, however, were the exceptions.
After a few years under the new law, most married couples living under a
"protective order" which required the husband to wear a chastity device
under the control of his wife fell into one of two common patterns:
1. The first, or "traditional," group continued their sex life much as
before, with the man initiating sex whenever he wanted it, and his wife
accommodating his desires as best she could. These wives were happy because
they knew their husbands were no longer fooling around with other women,
and their husbands were willing to accommodate to the chastity device
when they were away from their wives.
2. The second, or "modern," group consisted of wives who used the chastity
device to control their husband's sexual behavior to improve their own
sexual pleasure. This was the group that steadily grew larger. Typically,
these wives kept their husbands locked up until she desired sexual
activity with her husband, and would unlock him only for the duration
of the sex act (and periodically for sanitary purposes.)
The horny husbands of these wives quickly learned that it was in their
own self-interest to get their wives in a romantic, sexual mood as often
as possible, and "courting" behavior rapidly reappeared among these
husbands -- much to the delight of their wives.
Many of these wives learned the pleasures that flowed from denying their
husbands an orgasm by keeping him locked up during their sex play or
forbidding him to cum. Many husbands who previously had been only
half-hearted about giving their wife oral sex became ardent cunnilinguists,
and many became sexually addicted to it. Other husbands were taught how
a dildo could be used, especially when combined with oral sex, to
satisfy a woman. (If nothing else, this teaches a husband that he is
not indispensable to his wife's sexual pleasure, and it often resulted
in a reappraisal of his sexual role.)
Many wives reported that the husbands who were denied their regular sexual
orgasms, although sexually frustrated, were more sexually ardent than ever.
And those husbands who were naturally sexually submissive reveled in being
used to give sexual orgasms to their wives while being denied their own
orgasms.
A small minority of these liberated women totally denied their husbands
normal intercourse and orgasms. The great majority, however, reserved such
"treats" for special occasions, and only when their husbands had been
"nice" to them by being courteous and respectful and indulging their
various wishes. Their husbands always looked forward to being "rewarded" with
such "treats" and would do almost anything to "deserve" it.
Many, if not most, of these wives came to realize that their husbands,
although previously resistant, were now willing to share household chores
with their wives. As a result, most of the locked husbands took on new
duties as grocery shopper, cook, dishwasher, etc. This had some interesting
results:
Many wives reported that from time to time they experienced a delicious
twinge in their pussy when they watched their husband performing these
household chores for them, when they both knew that it was because of
her new-found sexual power.
Some wives resented it when their husband's performance of his household
chores was inept or careless. Instead of letting it slide, these wives
insisted on proper performance of these tasks and took active steps
to correct the situation, e.g., scolding, ridicule, making him re-do
the chores, and threatening him with unpleasant consequences. Uniformly,
these wives reported that they enjoyed the feeling of power this gave
them, and the fact that their husbands now took them more seriously.
A survey of the "modern" wives of locked husbands reported that the
great majority felt no loss of femininity, but rather felt more like
they believed a woman with power should feel, i.e., more self-assured,
confident and sexy. They also reported that they now shared an intimacy
with their husbands which previously had been lacking, and liked their
husbands much better.
Part Four: The Shift in the Male/Female Power Relationship
Largely unanticipated, the principal change that resulted from the
California Spousal Protection Act was the shift in power from the
husband to the wife in marriages in which the wife had obtained a
"protective order." Essentially what happened was that as both parties
got used to the wife being "in charge" of their sex life, it was only
natural that, over time, this would carry over to the rest of their
relationship. This was particularly true where the wife, currently or
in recent past, held a responsible position in the business or professional
world. She knew how to exert leadership and control, where necessary, and
was increasingly willing to do so in her marriage.
Similarly, the locked-up husbands were willing to accept leadership and
decision-making from their wives -- or at least were reluctant to risk
their wive's disfavor for fear of its consequences in the bedroom. Some
said that these men were "pussy whipped," and to a certain extent this
was true. But many wives pointed out that this term, intended to be
pejorative, was just a carryover from the macho, male-dominated period
which no longer existed, and besides many wives now considered the term
a kind of compliment. Fortunately, most wives in this situation knew how
to work collaboratively with their husbands, and how to make him feel
like he was a valued part of the marriage partnership.
The biggest change came when many of the wives of the locked-up husbands
came to assert themselves more forcefully in the economic decisions of the
marriage. Some of this followed naturally from the fact that the husband
was being "rationed" sexually by his wife. It didn't seem like too much of
a stretch when she decided to take charge of their checkbook and finances, or
when she put him on a monetary "allowance," which determined how much he
could spend without her express permission. This meant that when he wanted
to spend money on an "indulgence" he had to come to her to seek her
permission. Some men liked this arrangement; the others got used to it.
Overall, while there were some excesses and abuses, the married couples with
locked-up husbands gradually settled into their new relationship amicably,
and now the wife could wear either the "skirt" or the "pants" in the family
when and how she chose. After a while, this seemed like the only natural
way for a California married couple to live.
Page last updated 97-Feb-12 by:
Altairboy@aol.com
0 Flares
Twitter
0
Tweet
Facebook
0
Google+
0
Pin It Share
0
Email
--
Email to a friend
0 Flares
×
If you appreciate this article please offer a donation to show your support.
0 Flares
Twitter
0
Tweet
Facebook
0
Google+
0
Pin It Share
0
Email
--
Email to a friend
0 Flares
×
Ariel Detergent Asks Dads to #ShareTheLoad
I Want to Accept A Woman's Superiority
© 2016 ConquerHim All Rights Reserved
My wife Jane and I dated in college, broke up, and got back together nearly 20 years later. She was rather shy, though sexually adventurous, and was intrigued by my desire to be submissive to women. By the time we met up again, she had become a very successful executive.
Nearly a decade into our marriage, we hadn’t explored the concept of a female led relationship, though I did share my submissive fantasies with Jane. About five years ago, my brother Jerry married a beautiful younger woman, Nina, who brought FLR into our lives. We soon noticed that Jerry and Nina never fought and he immediately did anything Nina asked him to.
Jane and Nina soon became friends. They discussed FLR over wine at girls’ night out. Nina was raised in the precursor to a modern FLR home. Her father was obedient to her mother. He was even deferential to Nina and her two sisters, generally following their instructions cheerfully. Nina absorbed the idea that men were to be respected, but women were to be obeyed.
Nina’s father worked long hours as a doctor, but his office, at his wife’s insistence, was only a few blocks from home. He was always available to take care of any task Nina’s mother assigned him, or to take the girls shopping or to the movies. He was also responsible for all housework, including traditional cleaning, laundry, cooking, and grocery shopping.
Nina had grown up a bit spoiled but very independent and confident. Though nearly 20 years younger than Jerry, both knew from their first date that Nina would be the commander of their marital ship. Jerry delighted in giving Nina everything she wanted. He also took over many household duties to free his beautiful bride from boredom or drudgery.
Jerry works 60 hours a week, and makes a very good living. Nina doesn’t work and spends her days working out, shopping, and having lunch with friends. She has expensive tastes, but always looks spectacular. Jerry is aware of the attention she gets from other men and isn’t jealous. Indeed he considers the flirtation between Nina and her admirers a compliment to her beauty.
Jerry’s world revolves around serving her. Many times he’s gotten home late from a business trip and stayed up well past midnight grocery shopping, doing laundry or cleaning the house. Jerry also arranges several vacation and shopping trips each year for Nina.
Traveling to locations such as New York and London, Nina sometimes invites him along, and sometimes chooses to travel with girlfriends. So far, Nina has never invited a guy to travel with her, but it seems Jerry wouldn’t mind at all. I think that, like me, he finds cuckoldry very exciting.
My wife came away from these discussions quite impressed. She isn’t intrinsically “bossy” o
Trueinceststories
Mario Salieri
Amteur