Why Verification Matters in ASIC Design: Securing Functional Integrity

Electronics seems to change overnight—an increasingly complex world in which systems energize everything from smartphones and smart houses to the latest medical devices or automotive systems. At the very heart of it all are the application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs: a custom chip designed to do one thing or accomplish one specific task or function.

ASICs have been designed for maximum performance, power efficiency, and size advantages based on most electronic systems. However, designing an ASIC is a very complex and demanding task. A single error in a single place might make the whole chip unusable and can also be totally catastrophic, resulting in spectacular financial losses and delays in the projects of critical safety applications. That's where verification comes into the application.

Verification in ASIC design ensures the chip works exactly under all conditions, hence securing its functional integrity. Even though they may look like the best-looking designs, they may fail to meet today's demanding applications unless verification processes are guaranteed. This blog attempts to narrate why verification in ASIC design is so important, types of methodologies used for verification, and long-term implications on product success and safety.

The Complexity of ASIC Design

ASIC design is a specific type of chip designed for the sole purpose of only one particular type of function and not on a general-purpose chip, which may take on many other jobs like CPUs. The design must meet precise requirements related to performance, power consumption, area (PPA), and functionality. Modern-age ASICs carry increased complexity, and problems include billions of transistors, more than one clock domain, mixed signal environments, and complex power management schemes.

This complexity brings the risk of design faults. If they are left undetected, such faults might lead sometimes to tiny inefficiencies and other times to full-blown failures. For safety-critical applications, like autonomous driving, medical devices, or aerospace systems, undetected faults can prove fatal.

Verification guards against these risks. It will ensure that the design behaves as one expects, thus ensuring that all functional, performance, and power requirements are indeed met before manufacturing gets underway. Because the cost to fabricate an ASIC is very high, verification is critical in preventing costly rework or shredding of bad chips.

Click here to learn more about ASIC Design 

What is Verification?

Verification is actually all about verification that the design indeed meets all its intended specifications, and it behaves as it was expected for any eventuality. In the context of ASIC design, it involves ensuring that the chip's architecture, logic, and functionality are implemented correctly and are free of defects.

ASIC verification can be divided into the following logical stages:

• Functional Verification: It does this so that the silicon behaves as it is supposed to and exactly as designed.
• Formal Verification: it mathematically proves that the design meets certain properties or requirements.
• Power Verification: It therefore proves that the design does satisfy the power consumption requirements.
• Timing Verification: It will check whether it can meet the performance, concerning aspects of timing. 

Unless validated at every step, it might fail to function properly and even sometimes delay projects, cause cost overrun, and occasionally, even recall and safety issues.

The Role of Functional Verification

Hence, verification for functionality becomes the most important and time-consuming activity of all the exercises followed by the ASIC verification process—it verifies whether an ASIC design correctly implements intended functionality and accurately represents project specifications. In today's world, with the magnitude of sophistication of ASIC designs, the scope of functional verification is very broad, ranging from normal operation up to edge or corner cases under which a design might be tested to its limits.

The functional verification normally involves the following steps:

• Test Planning: It is a detailed verification plan that describes all tests needed for testing the design itself. Such a plan would cover all features and functions even corner cases.
• Testbench At this stage, a simulation environment or testbench that closely simulates the real-world operation of ASIC is developed. Input stimuli, expected output, and checkers are used to assure correctness in the design.
• Simulation: In this simulation, a design is exercised on numerous cycles of simulation to verify responses at different inputs and conditions. Simulations may include errors, for example, wrong logic, timing violations, or handling of inputs.
• Coverage Analysis: It determines if coverage has been made of the design and what remains untested. It checks if coverage metrics have been applied successfully to everything within the design.
• Identification of bugs and fixing: In most cases, while debugging, design errors or bugs are identified. After being identified, their fixes have to be done and the design checked again for proper working of such fixes. 

Functional verification is iterative. Fixes of bugs mean that new tests must then be designed in order to capture what effect has been made by not introducing new bugs into the system. In this iterative process, the design continues until verified against all functional requirements.

Formal Verification: A Complementary Approach

While simulation-based functional verification is undoubtedly needed—simulating all possible mistakes, for example—is impossible for billion-transistor designs and billions of possible states—fundamental verifications fill the gap by proving that a design obeys certain properties or constraints using mathematical techniques.

In formal verification, the designer first sets up formal properties that describe how the design should behave. Then a formal verification tool mathematically shows that those properties are bound to hold for all possible inputs and states. And probably simulation cannot cover all possible behaviour, so formal verification may ensure that there are certain types of errors that cannot be contained by the design.

Formal verification is extremely useful for checking all of the high-level matters of design, such as proving that some of the desired safety conditions never occur or that some of the control signals will never happen to be asserted together. Formal verification cannot replace functional verification, however; instead, it is a strong complementary technique that may help verify hard parts of the design that are difficult to exhaustively simulate.

Timing Verification: Meeting Performance Requirements

The most important sector in ASIC verification is known as timing verification—the design satisfies its desired performance specifications in terms of timing. Checks whether the signals inside the design travel fast enough to be able to supply required clock frequencies and whether all the setup and hold times for sequential elements, such as flip-flops, are met.

If timing verification is not performed correctly, the design may not function reliably at the desired clock frequency, leading to performance degradation or even complete failure. Metastability, race conditions, or clock skew from metastability ruin the efficiency of a chip due to these timing violations.

In general, STA is used in timing verification. It might check statically about the timing of a design, but it need not simulate every single possible input combination. STA identifies timing-critical paths and verifies them against the constraint.

Power Verification: Ensuring Efficiency

Power efficiency could not be an afterthought in new ASIC designs, primarily because of their applications: battery-powered devices, in particular, for smartphones, wearables, and IoT devices. Power verification ensures that the design actually meets its power consumption targets and works efficiently across all conditions.

Thus, it tests the chip for dynamic as well as static power, both switching and leakage in idle status. Such techniques—low power—are achieved through the use of power gating, clock gating, or even dynamic voltage scaling. It also ensures proper implementation of techniques such as these and ensures it doesn't cause a functional error.

The Cost of Inadequate Verification

Lack of proper verification can be disastrous; it may lead to financial and reputational damage. Among the most serious risks arising from inadequate verification include:

Product Delays: If verification is incomplete, design faults may only be known at the end of development. These might delay projects, cause market opportunities to be missed, and raise the actual costs.

Higher Development Costs: Re-spinning of an ASIC due to verification failures can be very expensive because fabrication per se is expensive. Several iterations of the designs may cause development costs to soar considerably.

Field failures and recalls. DNV becomes overdue at chip verification, and the device fails in the field, products are recalled, warranty claims mount, and damage is done to the company's reputation. For industries in autos and aerospace, for example, field failures at the same time represent safety risks and legal liabilities. 

Delayed Performance Requirements: It means the ASIC may not achieve its performance and power consumption goals if confirmation of adequate timing or power is not received from it. It simply would translate to an underperforming or power-consumption-heavy product and thus less competitive in the marketplace.

Verification in Safety-Critical Applications

Much higher stakes are associated with applications in safety-critical products such as automotive, medical, or aerospace. For example, a single fault might cause a catastrophic failure and endanger human life. Verification in safety-critical ASICs is thus bounded by very strict standards-definition ones like those defined by ISO 26262 for automotive systems or DO-254 for airborne systems.

Such industries put functional safety verification on the top seat. Functional safety verification allows the ASIC to be fault-tolerant, meaning that it could safely work in the presence of faults or errors. Here, fault-tolerant mechanisms, redundancy, and fail-safe modes are verified such that in the occurrence of a fault, the system would be safe to operate.

Conclusion

In the world of ASIC design, verification is not just a step in the process—it is the backbone of the entire development cycle. Complete verification provides correctness of chip functioning, achievement of performance power requirements, and avoidance of expensive failures in the field.

It will be that rather unattended area and only begin to assume importance with the increasingly complex ASIC designs. Whether it is simulation-based functional verification, formal verification, timing verification, or power verification, the necessity to ensure that the design is actually working successfully is paramount for the final product to become successful.

Verification can mean the difference between costly re-spins and even product delays, disastrous field failures not only in terms of their financial cost but also reputation. For safety-critical applications, verification is therefore a matter of life and death.

Thus, combining investment in design and 'comprehensive verification processes', makes it possible for an ASIC designer to have designs of the highest quality, reliability, and safety to ensure functional integrity and deliver successful products to the market.

Vendors, for more blogs and case studies, visit us at Nanogenius Technologies.