What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
faraday cage hats define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. faraday hats has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly faraday hats is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.