What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although what is a safe distance from a cell tower 're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
However, what is a safe distance from a cell tower found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower , psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.