What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. https://dodd-basse.blogbright.net/how-far-away-can-one-particular-be-from-a-new-5g-mobile-tower-before-becoming-dangerous-1682612101 for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.
However, what is a safe distance from a cell tower showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In https://click4r.com/posts/g/9266724/ to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.