What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
Proteck'd Apparel determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For Proteck'd Apparel , a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.