What is the safest distance from your 5G cell System?
If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
how to reduce emf exposure are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, Proteckd is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.