What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In safe distance from cell tower , psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.