What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. http://editortext35.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33973767-how-long-can-you-go-coming-from-a-5g-portable-tower-without-becoming-unsafe?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.