What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In safe distance to live from cell phone tower to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.