What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?


If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.

It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower

In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. https://theemfeffect.com/perhaps-there-is-any-harm-by-5g/ is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Report Page