What is the safest distance from the 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. safe distance to live from cell phone tower appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. safe distance from cell tower of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.