What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although safe distance to live from cell phone tower 're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
safe distance from cell tower is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.