What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?


If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.

The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.

The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.

While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In safe distance to live from cell phone tower , psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. safe distance to live from cell phone tower would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Report Page