What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. safe distance from cell tower look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
safe distance from cell tower determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. safe distance from cell tower is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.