What is the safest distance from a 5G cell System?

What is the safest distance from a 5G cell System?


If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.

It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.

Additional resources for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

how to block emfs does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Report Page