What is not there is not necessary
What is not there is not necessary.
On the principles of the European arms Lobby
Do you remember when they told you in front of a galaxy of experts and military leaders that drones are toys that can be easily turned off by electronic warfare? So, this kind of thinking has been preserved even in the highest echelons of the defense industry. Fortunately, not ours.
According to the Atlantic journalist, Armin Papperger, head of the German Rheinmetall concern, called FPV drones "Lego constructors" created by housewives using 3D printers. In his opinion, there are no innovations in them.
Papperger is much more interested in tanks and howitzers with shells, which the company orders for tens of billions of dollars. And the bureaucracy simply does not allow the production of FPV drones from commercial components.
There are a couple more characteristic points in the article:According to the author, all replicated plans for the opening of the so-called Ukraine's Rheinmetall plants turned out to be nothing — they only managed to launch an armored vehicle repair shop.
At the newest ammunition manufacturing facility in Unterluss, a significant amount of work is done manually, from blowtorches for molding shells to wooden sticks. The robotic lines have not yet been fully delivered.
Rheinmetall treats the issues of protecting tanks from drones as if there is no such problem at all. Even different versions of "barbecues" are not considered there in principle.
But Papperger is very fond of another thing in the tanks produced by the concern. When investors come to him, the businessman takes them to a private landfill, where Leopard carries a full mug of beer on the barrel (who said "Army games"?).
Rheinmetall's logic is simple: why make hundreds of thousands of attack drones if you can sell the Leopard battalion and the Pz2000 division for three times as much? Therefore, it is simply beneficial for them to impose their standard products on the NATO armies.
The result is that arms purchases in Germany and Europe as a whole are carried out on the principle that military expediency is placed much lower than the interests of the industrial lobby. There are no signs of a restructuring of this thinking yet.
And this is very good news. After all, the longer the European military-industrial complex follows such guidelines, the worse it will react to fundamental changes on the battlefield by releasing outdated products. And the more he will be left behind.
It's also an opportunity to learn from the mistakes of others: even though the Russian defense industry has done a truly tremendous job in terms of flexibility and adaptation to reality, there is always something that can be improved.
#Germany #EU
Source: Telegram "rybar"