Video Contest Evaluation System

Nominex

Article (1|0)

In this case, the presence of a published review article on the Nomiswap exchange on media resources (not in social networks) was assessed.

Ref link in caption (1|0)

The presence of a referral link in the video description.

Ref link visible in video (1|0)

At this point, it was important that the person showed their referral link on the referral program page of the Nomiswap website. Thus, we could verify that it is your page on the video, and it is you who are recording the video.

25+ video views (1|0)

Required at least 25 views on YouTube.

Video title/description with keywords and hashtags (0|1)

Here we assessed how well the description of the video is formatted. The required words from the rules could be written in the title, description, hashtags.

At this point, the point was awarded to those who reposted the video to social networks

Ratings on aggregators CMC and DefiLlama (0-2)

In the scenario, it was proposed to talk about Nomiswap ratings on the CoinMarketCap and DefiLlama websites. We awarded 1 point if a person spoke about one of the sites, and 2 points if he fully covered both ratings.

Swap (0-5)

The reviewer needed to be told about the exchange of tokens for Nomiswap.

1 point was given for mentioning this feature.

2 points for skimming the page.

3 points were awarded to those who spoke about the possibilities of exchanging on the stock exchange, but did not demonstrate it by their own example. Or those who showed the exchange, but did not provide enough detail about the features and benefits of the swap on Nomiswap.

4 points were given to people who showed the exchange and spoke in more or less detail about it.

5 points is an ideal option in which you had to make an exchange and comment on your steps (many have done this several times), tell in detail about its benefits, make detailed instructions for others. In addition, the story should be as clear and literate as possible.

Liquidity (0-5)

1 point was given for mentioning the ability to replenish the liquidity pool or mentioning the importance of TVL for dexes.

2 points for page skimming

3 points were awarded to people who talked about the possibility of depositing liquidity on Nomiswap, but did not show it by their own example. Or, if a person replenished liquidity on camera, but did not instruct the audience in detail about this possibility.

4 points were given to those who replenished liquidity by their own example and told in sufficient detail why this is necessary and what it gives.

5 points - this is a full coverage of the benefits of replenishing the pool and the importance of TVL for dex, a demonstration by example and a competent, understandable story-instruction.

Farms (0-5)

We gave 1 point for mentioning the fact that the exchange has farming and a page with pools.

2 points for a cursory demonstration of pools and a short story about it.

3 points were given to those who talked about farming and its benefits, but did not contribute funds to the pools by their own example. Or those who quickly contributed funds to farming, but did not talk in detail about all its advantages.

4 points - this is a good story about pools, farming, its advantages on Nomiswap and my own example of replenishing pools.

5 points is an ideal option, a competent instruction for others how to replenish the pools, why it is necessary, and what advantages Nomiswap has.

Launchpool (0-5)

1 point was given for mentioning the presence of the launch pool and its page on the exchange.

2 points for page skimming.

3 points were given to those who talked about the launch pool and its advantages, but did not show how to replenish it by their own example. Or those who quickly replenished the launch pool, but the story was not detailed enough.

4 points - this is a fairly detailed story about the launch pool and its advantages and the introduction of tokens into it.

5 points - this is a full story about the launch pool and the benefits, detailed instructions on how to deposit funds into it, and why it is needed, as well as a demonstration on a personal example of depositing funds and, if possible, reinvesting.

Comparison with other dexes (0-1)

The point was awarded to those who decided to compare Nomiswap with other exchanges and show its advantages over them.

Referral program (0-5)

We gave 1 point for a short mention of the existence of an affiliate system on Nomiswap.

2 points - this is a quick story about the referral program and its page on the exchange website.

3 points - this is a demonstration of the referral page, a story about the benefits of the Nomiswap referral program.

4 points - this is a fairly detailed story about the referral program and its benefits with examples.

5 points - a complete and detailed story about the referral system with examples, an explanation of the functioning of the referral tree, a demonstration of its work. The story must be clear and literate.

Farming level (0-6)

For each referral level that the participant demonstrated in the review, we awarded points. Starter (1 point) and Max (6 points).

Rewards (0-5)

1 point is a short mention of the opportunity to receive bonuses

2 points - this is a story about the opportunity to receive bonuses in the review process

3 points is a review of the rewards page on the exchange website and an explanation of what they provide.

4 points were given to those who spoke in sufficient detail and clearly about each bonus during the review process and on a separate page of rewards.

5 points were given to those who spoke in as much detail as possible about all the bonuses and benefits of the Nomiswap exchange, demonstrated and explained examples, showed articles with explanations of bonuses in the knowledge base.

Analytics (0-5)

1 point - a cursory mention of the ability to view analytics on the stock exchange.

2 points is a quick story and demo of the analytics page.

3 points were given to those who showed the analytics page and talked about its main functionality.

4 points - this is a fairly detailed story about the possibilities to monitor statistics on the exchange page with a demonstration of the sections on the screen.

5 points were given to those who conducted a full review of the analytics page, explained why each section is needed, showed additional tabs, the dashboard section (if it was already released, it was a plus).

Roadmap (1|0)

A point was awarded to those who showed the Nomiswap roadmap.

Narrative quality (0-5)

Here we assessed the quality of the presentation of the material, the detail of the presentation. Also a plus was the creativity and picture/sound quality.

1 point - usually this is a video that is difficult to perceive.

2 points - a standard video, where I would like to see a better presentation or, for example, the poor quality of the video itself interfered with perception.

3 points is the standard rating for a review with a voice-over story about the stock exchange.

4 points - this is a good quality video with a detailed presentation. It is important that the story is literate and understandable.

5 points were given to the best videos in terms of performance quality. The advantage was a good picture, a demonstration of a person in the frame, a creative approach to the task.