Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
safe distance from cell tower is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
safe distance from cell tower does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore safe distance from cell tower shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.