Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a cell tower appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.