Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
safe distance from cell tower does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.