Very best safest distance from your 5G cell System?

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell System?


If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users.

The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.

The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such safe distance to live from cell phone tower shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In https://anotepad.com/notes/a6p23x3f , the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. safe distance to live from cell phone tower could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Report Page