Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.