Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. https://schaefer-vinson.mdwrite.net/proteckd-apparel-is-the-best-emf-protector-on-the-market-1679740209 include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, best emf cell phone protection and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.