Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. safe distance to live from cell phone tower can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. Go to this website includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. safe distance from cell tower could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.