Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. safe distance from cell tower is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.