Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
https://authorpocket2.doodlekit.com/blog/entry/25125477/how-far-away-from-a-5g-mobile-tower-system-is-secure is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
https://telegra.ph/What-is-the-Minimum-Acceptable-Mileage-Between-Yourself-and-a-5G-Mobile-Tower-04-07 is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.